REGULAR MEETING SEPTEMBER 11, 1972
<br />RESOLUTION NO. 326 -72 (CONTINUED)
<br />overall credit. Councilman Kopczynski asked what the project life was. Mr. Richardson said it
<br />was about five years. Mr Glenn Barbe of the Department of Redevelopment said that this is the
<br />second action year of a three year program. Councilman Kopczynski asked how much more the pro-
<br />ject would cost the city. Mr. Richardson said our total cost is 25% of the total amount to be
<br />spent in the area and that it would involve a total project cost of between $600,000 and $650,000.
<br />Councilman Taylor moved that the resolution be adopted, seconded by Councilman Szymkowiak. The
<br />resolution was adopted by a roll call vote of nine ayes (Councilmen Serge, Szymkowiak, Miller,
<br />Parent, Taylor, Kopczynski, Horvath Newburn andNemeth).
<br />RESOLUTION NO. 327 -72 A RESOLUTION APPROVING APPLICATION FOR
<br />"RECERTIFICATION OF WORKABLE PROGRAM FOR
<br />COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT.
<br />WHEREAS, an application for Recertification of the Workable Program for Community Improvement has
<br />been filed with the Common Council of the City of South Bend, which report is now before the
<br />Common Council of the City of South Bend, which report is now before the Common Council; and
<br />WHEREAS, the approval of the Common Council to said application is required by the Department of
<br />Housing and Urban Development of the United States of America as a continuing requisite for the
<br />City of South Bend's eligibility to receive federal funds; and
<br />WHEREAS, the Common Council has examined said report and finds it satisfactory;
<br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Common Council of the City of South Bend, that the report
<br />captioned "Applocation for Recertification of the Workable Program for Community Improvement" be
<br />submitted for recertification.
<br />Adopted this 11 day of September 1972.
<br />/s/ Odell Newburn
<br />Member of the Common Council of the City of
<br />South Bend.
<br />A public hearing was held on the resolution at this time. Dr. John Kromkowski, Director of Human
<br />Resources, said that the Workable Program document covers four general areas: housing, code
<br />enforcement, planning and citizen involvement. Recertification is required every two years as
<br />a prerequisite for federal funding. The program includes systematic code enforcement of housing,
<br />but not house to house inspection, in areas which have blatant code violations. citizen involve-
<br />ment would be expanded with the Director of Human Resources pulling together planning functions
<br />of federal activities and city activities. HUD has insisted that citizens be part of the planning
<br />and consulation for activities that affect the physical and human aspects of their lives. The
<br />program will undergo intensive review within the next six months. Dr. Kromkowski said that the
<br />document grows out of long consultation and planning and the Council has had the document for 21
<br />days for study and review. Funding will be sought for 1000 public housing units, 200 of which
<br />are to be completed within the next two years. Councilman Nemeth questioned Dr. Kromkowski about
<br />changes to be made in the document and Dr. Kromkowski said that changes were being made on page 4,
<br />6, 7, 8, and 9 and that a citizen participation appendix was being added to the document. Mrs.
<br />Lee Swan, 2022 Swygart Street, asked Dr. Kromkowski about the house to house inspection which has
<br />caused a great deal of concern among the citizens. Dr. Kromkowski said this was changed on the
<br />insistence of citizen groups with which they have met. Instead, a visual survey of homes will be
<br />made in areas where there are many violations. Councilman Nemeth said that some of the citizens
<br />who changed the Workable Program in regard to house to house inspection were members of the
<br />Common Council. Councilman Taylor said that he would like to.point something out regarding
<br />citizen participation because it might eventually lead to war against HUD. When the Council first
<br />received copies of the Workable Program, it gave the power to neighborhood groups to veto deci-
<br />sions made-by the Mayor and the Common Council. During the discussions conducted over the past
<br />several days, this section has been stricken. Councilman Taylor said that when HUD says to the
<br />City and to the Council that a neighborhood group is going to have veto power over the elected
<br />officials of the City and the elected Council of the City, then city government is no more.
<br />Councilman Newburn said that he thought there was a misinterpretation on the part of some indivi-
<br />duals as to the veto power and that it was really calling for a joint agreement between the
<br />people and public officials. Councilman Miller said that the Director of Human Resources will
<br />have an officer for Community Development and asked how it would be funded. Dr. Kromkowski said
<br />that the federal government will fund this position. Councilman Miller then asked, if the city
<br />is going to ask for funding for 1000 housing units, is 200 enough to ask for the next two years
<br />or should it be more? Mr. O'Brien of the Housing Autbority said that at the present time there
<br />is a waiting list of 375 for housing units, for the elderly and moderate income families as well
<br />as low income familites. The problem with requesting more units at the present time is that it
<br />is difficult to get adequate housing sites in the City of South Bend. The Housing Authority is
<br />moving as rapidly as it can. Councilman Miller asked about the reference in the document on
<br />Page 14 to Kelly Park and the old County Court House. Dr. Kromkowski said that the Kelly Park
<br />applicationwas put in but that the Council did not fund it. A program is always dependent on
<br />local funding. Councilman Miller asked the meaning of the term "legacy of parks ". Dr. Kromkowski
<br />said that that is the federal code name for parks being funded through HUD. Councilman Parent
<br />said that he felt the reference to Kelly Park should be left in the document. He said he feels the
<br />plan is a good beginning. Some areas have obviously been neglected and some areas will have to
<br />be improved. He said that he would vote for the plan because it is a good beginning and because
<br />it will be reviewed every six months. Councilman Newburn asked for some information as to why
<br />the restoration of the old County Court House is included in the program. Mayor Miller said that
<br />an application was made to HUD 18 months ago by the County Commissioners for money for this
<br />program. The first phase of the project was in the neighborhood of $40,000 to $50,000 to be re-
<br />imbursed by HUD. It is a county project but is in the Workable Program because it is in the City
<br />of South Bend. Councilman Miller made a motion to amend Page 14, Section E by deleting "and the
<br />development of the Kelly Playground located in the Northeast Neighborhood. Applications for both
<br />projects have been submitted to HUD under the Legacy of Parks concept ", and by changing the last
<br />sentence to read "Cost for this project will be in the vicinity of $250,000 ". The motion was
<br />seconded by Councilman Kopczynski and was carried. Councilman Nemeth said "In regard to citizen
<br />participation, I feel that I am a citizen participating in government. This is the traditional
<br />concept of citizens' involvement in government. The ultimate responsibility should be on the
<br />Council and on the Mayor as elected representatives of their constituents. No non - elected group
<br />should have veto power over elected officials ". Councilman Taylor moved for adoption of the
<br />resolution, seconded by Councilman Kopczynski. The resolution was adopted by a roll call vote of
<br />nine ayes (Councilmen Serge, Szymkowiak, Miller, Parent, Taylor, Kopczynski, Horvath, Newburn
<br />and Nemeth).
<br />
|