Laserfiche WebLink
SPECIAL MEETING JULY 31, 1972 <br />Council President said that the first item of business on the agenda was the Second Reading on <br />an ORDINANCE amending the Refuse Ordinance of the City of South Bend, Indiana. Councilman Parent <br />said that he would object to the second reading of the ordinance because of lack of time. He <br />said that, since the ordinance is already set for public hearing on August 14th, he would like <br />to move to set the second reading of the ordinance for August 14th the same time as the public <br />hearing. The motion was seconded by Councilman Kopczynski and carried. <br />ORDINANCES, FIRST AND SECOND READING <br />ORDINANCE 5415 -72 AN ORDINANCE FIXING THE ANNUAL PAY OF POLICEMEN <br />FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 1973 <br />This ordinance had first reading by title and second reading in full. Councilman Newburn moved <br />to amend the Ordinance as follows: In Section II: Education Incentive to be paid must be for <br />courses related to police work. Credit hours used toward incentive pay must be completed with a <br />passing grade. Councilman Parent seconded the motion and it carried. Councilman Parent moved to <br />amend the ordinance as follows: In Section II: For time spent in court appearances and overtime <br />work - $5.00 per hour as determined by the Chief of Police. Councilman Kopczynski seconded the <br />motion. Councilman Nemeth asked if this means the Chief would also determine the pay per hour. <br />Councilman Newburn said that would remain at $5.00 per hour. Councilman Nemeth said that adding <br />the clause to the end of the sentence might make the meaning unclear. Councilman Parent then <br />said he would withdraw his original motion and propose another amendment as follows: For time <br />spent in court appearances and overtime work, as determined by the Chief of Police, $5.00 per <br />hour. Councilman Kopczynski seconded the motion to amend and it carried. Councilman Nemeth said <br />the chair would entertain a motion to delay action on this ordinance until completion of the first <br />and second reading on the Firemen's Pay Ordinance, so moved by Councilman Parent, seconded by <br />Councilman Kopczynski. Motion carried. <br />ORDINANCE 5416 -72 <br />AN ORDINANCE FIXING THE ANNUAL PAY OF FIREMEN <br />FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 1973. <br />This Ordinance was given first reading by title and second reading in full. Councilman Parent <br />made a motion that the amount in Section II, Line Six, for regularly assigned scuba divers be <br />changed to $225 per year. Councilman Taylor seconded the motion and it carried. Councilman <br />Taylor made a motion that the Council suspend the rules and hold public hearings on both these <br />ordinances and third reading at this time. Councilman Horvath seconded the motion and it was <br />carried unanimously. <br />A public hearing was held on these ordinances at this time. Council President Nemeth asked Vice <br />President-Szymkowiak to assume the chair. Mr. Nemeth then made a presentation for the two <br />ordinances. The ordinances propose a 5.5% across the board pay increase for police and firemen. <br />There have been amendments made tonight in regard to pay for scuba divers and restrictions on <br />educational incentive pay. Also, the Chief of Police is to determine what constitutes court <br />appearance and overtime work on the part of a police officer at the rate of pay of $5.00 per hour. <br />The police pay ordinance does include a clause providing a $100 per month bonus for service after <br />20 years on the department, subject to the recommendation of the Board of Public Safety. Mr. <br />Nemeth said that the Chiefs of both Departments were present to answer questions and that he <br />would also be glad to try to answer any questions. Miss Virginia Guthrie, Executive Secretary of <br />the Civic Planning Association, said that her organization had recommended that all pay increases <br />be held to 3 %. She said it is their opinion that the 5.5% guidelines must include all fringe <br />benefits and asked if these had been included in the computation. Private John Nelson, Chairman <br />of the Fire Department Wage Committee, said that they had applied to the pay board for a waiver <br />and perhaps the city had received an answer to that request. Deputy City Controller Charles <br />Watkins said that, to his knowledge, they had not received any information on this matter. <br />Councilman Nemeth said that the changes recommended as far as the bonus is concerned would cost <br />the city less money, because a retired policeman would receive $4000 plus dollars per year. <br />Councilman Parent said that the 5.5% increase was based on last year's salary which included the <br />fringe benefits, so they were not exceeding the guidelines. Mr. Carl Zwierzynski, President of <br />the South Bend Firefighter's Association, Local 362, AFL -CIO, spoke representing members of his <br />organization. He said that the 5.5% increase is not equal to a cost of living increase because <br />the men won't get the increase until January, 1973. He asked why the clothing allowance for the <br />Police Department is $300 and for the Fire Department only $250. He asked why the $100 monthly <br />bonus was offered only to policemen who stay on the job after 20 years service. He said that a <br />firefighter with 20 years experience, who has done his job well, has earned this also. He said <br />that this only widens the disparity that exists between the departments now. He said you are <br />dealing with a problem of morale when you continue with a greater disparity. He said that they <br />had invited a Councilman to bring his colleagues to one of the fire stations to gain some infor- <br />mation about the department but no one showed up. <br />Fire Chief Jack R. Bland spoke to the Council on the subject of disparity. He said that in the <br />mid- 1960's, as Chairman of the Fire Department Wage Committee, he fought the first fight against <br />disparity between the two departments. At that time, it was non - existent but not it is broaden- <br />ing every year. He said he fails to see the reasoning that a firefighter doing his work well is, <br />for some reason or other, of less value than a man who carries a gun and enforces the law. The <br />South Bend community is affected by both police work and fire work. It is difficult to under- <br />stand why one is of greater value than the other. The men are concerned with the reason for the <br />existence and elongation of any disparity between the two departments. Mrs. Janet Allen, 125 W. <br />Marion Street, said that she is disturbed by this disparity between the departments, also. She <br />said that it started out in one classification and now exists in four classifications. A fire- <br />fighter first class is paid less than a policeman first class. She also asked whether the <br />increase for scuba divers also included the drivers. She said that if you elect to pay a <br />policeman a $100 bonus for staying on after 20 years of service, he might be earning mare than a <br />Division Chief. Mr. Nelson questioned the rate of overtime pay for holidays and said that for a <br />policeman working eight hours it amounts to $4.00 per hour and for a fire fighter, working <br />twenty -four hours, it amounts to $1.21 per hour. <br />Council President Nemeth resumed the chair and thanked Vice President Szymkowiak for conducting <br />that portion of the meeting. The Council then proceeded with their portion of the public hearing. <br />Councilman Serge asked Chief Bland how long a firefighter remains on duty when he is recalled. <br />Chief Bland said that the recall lasts as long as the fire exists or until the Chief releases the <br />men. Councilman Serge asked the Chief why there are more firemen than policemen in,.-South Bend. <br />Chief Bland said that the methodology of fire fighting has changed considerably. We now have a <br />26 -story building in South Bend. The new high rise buildings are out of range of the tallest <br />aerials, requiring a great deal of manpower to haul hose and equipment to extinguish fires. <br />Chief Bland said that twelve men were dropped from the 1970 budget. He said the city is having <br />more fires with more severe destruction and the need is for personnel. Councilman Serge asked <br />