Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR MEETING APRIL 9, 1979 <br />COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING (CONTINUED <br />BILL NO. 38 -79 <br />A BILL AMENDING CHAPTER 7, ARTICLE 5, SECTION 7 -76, OF THE <br />MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA, COMMONLY <br />KNOWN AS THE SCRAP AND JUNK DEALERS ORDINANCE, BY REQUIRING <br />THAT THE FENCING OF SCRAP AND JUNK YARDS BE CONSTRUCED OF <br />SOLID OR OPAQUE MATERIAL, BY PROHIBITING THE PILING OF SCRAP <br />OR JUNK ABOVE THE HEIGHT OF THE FENCING, AND BY AUTHORIZING <br />THE BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS TO ADOPT RULES AND REGULATIONS. <br />This being the time heretofore set for public hearing on the above bill, proponents and opponents <br />were given an opportunity to be heard. Mr. James Masters, Assistant City Attorney, made the <br />presentation for the bill. He indicated that this proposed bill would amend the present City <br />ordinance regulating scrap and junk yards by requiring such yards to be fully enclosed by solid <br />or opaque fencing and to prohibit the piling of scrap or junk above the height of the fence. <br />He said the present ordinance required only that there be a six foot solid fence, hwoever, there <br />was a major exception in that no fencing is required along a railroad siding. He said the pre- <br />sent ordinance allows the piling of scrap above the fence. He said this amendment to the present <br />ordinance would serve as an effective means to safeguard the integrity of residential neighbor- <br />hoods by requiring that scrap or junk sotred in such yards be screended from public view. He <br />indicated that the proposed bill had an error in Section I and Section II in that it refers to <br />Article 7, and it should be Article 5. Mr. Andrew Rupchock, 606 Indiana, asked the meaning of <br />opaque. It was explained that.opaque means not transparent. Mr. James McMahon, attorney re- <br />presenting Breman Iron and Metal, indicated that his client was willing to meet any reasonable <br />requirement imposed by the Council. He said that the requirement that scrap could only be piled <br />six foot high on a railroad siding would impose an economical hardship on the company. Mr. <br />Harold Brueseke, attorney representing several scrap dealers in the area, showed a film depicting <br />the operation of a scrap yard. He said the concern of his clients as far as the fencing <br />requirement is concerned, is that if they are required to have a fence equal or as high as the <br />piling of scrap it could be fifteen to twenty feet high. He indicated if they have to have a <br />maximum of six feet they would have to acquire more land. He indicated there should be more <br />consideration and study given to this proposed bill. Council Member Horvath indicated this bill <br />would cause many problems for the scrap dealers, and more thought should be given to this bill. <br />He indicated that the Council, neighborhood groups and the junk dealers should work together to <br />obtain a workable bill. Mrs. Jane Swan, 2022 Swaygart, indicated more work should be done on <br />this bill, but a least this was a start, and something has to be done. Ms. Holly.Brown, 215 E. <br />Bronson, indicated that if the yards were fenced it would discourage dumping outside of the fence <br />Council Member Adams made a motion to amend the bill, as reflected in the proposed amendment, <br />by striking Sections I, II, and III, and substituting Section IV, except in (c) remove the date <br />of January 1, 1980. There was a discussion regarding the Council rule of not stripping a bill. <br />Council Member Adams withdrew her motion. Council Member Parent made a motion to refer this <br />bill to the Public Works Committee, seconded by Council Member Serge. The motion carried. <br />There being no further business to come before the Committee of the Whole, Council Member <br />Kopczynski made a motion to rise and report to the Council, seconded by Council Member Adams. <br />The motion carried. <br />ATTEST: <br />_P" <br />City Clerk <br />ATTEST: <br />airman <br />REGULAR MEETING RECONVENED <br />Be it remembered that the regular meeting of the Common Council of the City of South Bend recon- <br />vened in the Council Chambers on the fourth floor of the County -City Building at 8:02 p.m., <br />Council President Parent presiding and eight members present. <br />Council Member Serge asked Mr. Mullen to send him a list of the licensed junk yards. Council <br />Member Dombrowski indicated that a letter should be sent to neighborhood groups advising them <br />of the Public Works Committee meeting. <br />BILLS, SECOND READING <br />ORDINANCE NO. 6574 -79 <br />AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 4990 -68, AS AMENDED, <br />COMMONLY KNOWN AS THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF <br />SOUTH BEND, INDIANA (CHAPTER 21, MUNICIPAL CODE) <br />(2610 PRAIRIE.) <br />This bill had second reading. Council Member Adams made a motion to pass this bill, seconded <br />by Council Member Serge. The bill passed by a roll call vote of eight ayes. <br />ORDINANCE NO. 6575 -79 <br />AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 21, ARTICLE 7, SECTION 21 -120 <br />OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA, <br />BY REQUIRING THAT PROPOSED REZONINGS BE ADVERTISED BY <br />COMMON ADDRESS AND THAT THE PROPERTY HAVE A PUBLIC NOTICE <br />POSTED THEREON. <br />This bill had second reading. Council Member Serge made a motion to pass this bill, seconded <br />by Council Member Adams. The bill passed by a roll call vote of eight ayes. <br />BILL NO. 38 -79 <br />A BILL AMENDING CHAPTER 7, ARTICLE 5, SECTION 7 -76, OF THE <br />MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA COMMONLY <br />KNOWN AS THE SCRAP AND JUNK DEALERS ORDINANCE, BY REQUIRING <br />THAT THE FENCING OF SCRAP AND JUNK YARDS BE CONSTRUCTED OF <br />SOLID OR OPAQUE MATERIAL, BY PROHIBITING THE PILING OF <br />SCRAP OR JUNK ABOVE THE HEIGHT OF THE FENCING, AND BY <br />AUTHORIZING THE BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS TO ADOPT RULES AND <br />REGULATIONS. <br />Council Member Dombrowski made a motion to refer this bill to the Public Works Committee and <br />bring it back to the Council in six weeks, seconded by Council Member Adams. The motion carried. <br />