Laserfiche WebLink
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING (CONTINUED <br />BILL NO. 195 -78 A BILL ESTABLISHING A USER FEE FOR THE USE OF AMBULANCE /MEDICAL <br />SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE QTY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA, THROUGH <br />ITS PARAMEDIC BRANCH OF THE FIRE DEPARTMENT. <br />This being the time heretofore set for public hearing on the above bill, proponents and opponent <br />were given an opportunity to be heard. Mr. Peter Mullen, City Controller, made the presentation <br />for the bill. He indicated this bill would set a fee of $35 for all ambulance runs, and there <br />would be no additional charges for mileage, treatment or drugs. He said that this bill would <br />provide a fee of $20 for senior citizens. He indicated that these established rates could <br />bring an income to the City of over $100,000. Council Member Adams, Chairman of the Personnel <br />and Finance Committee, indicated her committee had met, and Mr. Lou McGann and Lester Fox, <br />had attended the meeting. She indicated that it was necessary that an established fee be set <br />for everyone, as this was in accordance with Medicare and Medicade. She made a motion to <br />amend Section I, by adding, "When a person is actually transported," after the word Department; <br />and Section 2 be deleted, making Section3, Section 2 and Section 4, Section 3, seconded by <br />Council Member Kopczynski. The motion carried. Mr. Mullen asked if the ambulance goes to <br />a home and does not ransport, if there would be a charge. Council Member Adams indicated there <br />would not be a charge. Mr. Mullen indicated he felt that non - transported patients should be <br />charged if it was a frivolous run. Council Member Miller indicated he agreed with the amend- <br />ment. Mr. Mullen asked Chief Van Wiele how many calls were made where they do not transport. <br />Chief Van Wiele indicated that at least a quarter of the runs made are not transported. Council <br />Member Kopczynski made a motion to recommend this bill to the Council favorable, as amended, <br />seconded by Council Member Serge. The motion carried. <br />BILL NO. 181 -78 A BILL TO AMEND SECTION 15 -16 AND TO REPEAL SECTION 15 -29 OF <br />THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA, AS <br />AMENDED. <br />This being the time heretofore set for public hearing on the above bill, proponents and opponent <br />were given an opportunity to be heard. Mr. Kevin Butler, attorney for the Courtest Cab Associa- <br />tion and Indiana Yellow Cab Co., made the presentation for the bill. He indiated that the <br />rates would be increased to ten cents for each one - seventh of a mile over the first one -fifth <br />of a mile, as well as the limitation against additional passengers would be eliminated. He <br />indicated that the continued rise in the cost of living necessitates this request. He said <br />this will be the first rate increase since January of 1977. Council Member Horvath asked if <br />the first person in the cab would have the right to refuse to share the cab. Mr. Butler in- <br />dicated that is what they were seeking to change. Mr. Sharp of the Yellow Cab Company, indicate <br />that this was something that would not be abused, and the company only wanted to perform a <br />better service. He said that most people would be willing to share the cab. Council President <br />Parent made a motion to recommend this bill to the Council favorable, seconded by Council Member <br />Serge. The motion carried. <br />BILL NO. 186 -78 A BILL APPROVING MONEYS FOR THE PURPOSE OF DEFRAYING THE <br />CETA TITLE I EXPENSES OF THE BUREAU OF EMPLOYMENT AND <br />TRAINING FOR THE FISCAL PERIOD BEGINNING OCTOBER 1, 1977, <br />AND ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 1978, INCLUDING ALL OUTSTANDING <br />CLAIMS AND,OBLI GAT IONS, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME <br />SHALL TAKE EFFECT. <br />BILL NO. 187 -78 <br />BILL NO. 188 -78 <br />BILL NO. 189 -78 <br />A BILL APPROVING MONEYS <br />CETA TITLE II EXPENSES <br />TRAINING FOR THE FISCAL <br />AND ENDING DECEMBER 31, <br />CLAIMS AND OBLIGATIONS, <br />SHALL TAKE EFFECT. <br />FOR THE PURPOSE OF DEFRAYING THE <br />DF THE BUREAU OF EMPLOYMENT AND <br />PERIOD BEGINNING OCTOBER 1, 1978, <br />1978, INCLUDING ALL OUTSTANDING <br />AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME <br />A BILL APPROVING MONEYS FOR THE PURPOSE OF DEFRAYING <br />THE CETA TITLE III EXPENSES OF THE BUREAU OF EMPLOYMENT <br />AND TRAINING FOR THE FISCAL PERIOD BEGINNING OCTOBER 1, <br />1978, AND ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 1979, INCLUDING ALL <br />OUTSTANDING CLAIMS ANDOBLIGATIONS, AND FIXING A TIME <br />WHEN THE SAME SHALL TAKE EFFECT. <br />A BILL APPROVING MONEYS FOR THE PURPOSE OF DEFRAYING <br />THE CETA TITLE VI EXPENSES OF THE BUREAU OF EMPLOYMENT <br />AND TRAINING FOR THE FISCAL PERIOD BEGINNING OCTOBER 1, <br />1978, AND ENDING DECEMBER 31, 1978, INCLUDING ALL <br />OUTSTANDING CLAIMS AND OBLIGATIONS, AND FIXING A TIME <br />WHEN.THE SAME SHALL TAKE EFFECT. <br />This being the time heretofore set for public hearing on the above bills, proponents and opponents <br />were given an opportunity to be heard. Mr. Elroy Kelzenberg, Director of the Bureau of Employ- <br />ment and Training, made the presentation for the bills. He indicated these bills represented <br />almost all of the CETA funding that comes into the City. He said that Congress has recently <br />passed a four year extension for CETA. He indicated that the estimates from the Department of <br />Labor: Title II, one fiscal quarter at the same level; Title III, 93% of previous year's alloca- <br />tion; and Title VI, one fiscal quarter at the same level; do not contribute to accurate budget <br />figures. He indicated that the figures presented on each of these bills are the ones submitted <br />to the Department of Labor, in that they represent a reasonable figure, but they do not neces- <br />sarily represent a final allocation. Council Member Adams indicated that the allotment was down <br />from 1.7 million to 1.2 million and yet there were four more employees to administered the funds. <br />She indicated this should be sent to committee for two weeks, in order to look at the differences <br />in the budget. She made a motion to recommend these bills to the Personnel and Finance Committee, <br />and continue them until the next scheduled Council meeting, seconced by Council Member Kopczynski. <br />Mr. Kelzenberg indicated they were handling new title programs and they had to meet mandates set <br />for the Department of Labor. Council Member Miller indicated that eight percent administrative <br />costs were not excessive. The motion failed. <br />