COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING (CONTINUED
<br />BILL NO. 195 -78 A BILL ESTABLISHING A USER FEE FOR THE USE OF AMBULANCE /MEDICAL
<br />SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE QTY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA, THROUGH
<br />ITS PARAMEDIC BRANCH OF THE FIRE DEPARTMENT.
<br />This being the time heretofore set for public hearing on the above bill, proponents and opponent
<br />were given an opportunity to be heard. Mr. Peter Mullen, City Controller, made the presentation
<br />for the bill. He indicated this bill would set a fee of $35 for all ambulance runs, and there
<br />would be no additional charges for mileage, treatment or drugs. He said that this bill would
<br />provide a fee of $20 for senior citizens. He indicated that these established rates could
<br />bring an income to the City of over $100,000. Council Member Adams, Chairman of the Personnel
<br />and Finance Committee, indicated her committee had met, and Mr. Lou McGann and Lester Fox,
<br />had attended the meeting. She indicated that it was necessary that an established fee be set
<br />for everyone, as this was in accordance with Medicare and Medicade. She made a motion to
<br />amend Section I, by adding, "When a person is actually transported," after the word Department;
<br />and Section 2 be deleted, making Section3, Section 2 and Section 4, Section 3, seconded by
<br />Council Member Kopczynski. The motion carried. Mr. Mullen asked if the ambulance goes to
<br />a home and does not ransport, if there would be a charge. Council Member Adams indicated there
<br />would not be a charge. Mr. Mullen indicated he felt that non - transported patients should be
<br />charged if it was a frivolous run. Council Member Miller indicated he agreed with the amend-
<br />ment. Mr. Mullen asked Chief Van Wiele how many calls were made where they do not transport.
<br />Chief Van Wiele indicated that at least a quarter of the runs made are not transported. Council
<br />Member Kopczynski made a motion to recommend this bill to the Council favorable, as amended,
<br />seconded by Council Member Serge. The motion carried.
<br />BILL NO. 181 -78 A BILL TO AMEND SECTION 15 -16 AND TO REPEAL SECTION 15 -29 OF
<br />THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA, AS
<br />AMENDED.
<br />This being the time heretofore set for public hearing on the above bill, proponents and opponent
<br />were given an opportunity to be heard. Mr. Kevin Butler, attorney for the Courtest Cab Associa-
<br />tion and Indiana Yellow Cab Co., made the presentation for the bill. He indiated that the
<br />rates would be increased to ten cents for each one - seventh of a mile over the first one -fifth
<br />of a mile, as well as the limitation against additional passengers would be eliminated. He
<br />indicated that the continued rise in the cost of living necessitates this request. He said
<br />this will be the first rate increase since January of 1977. Council Member Horvath asked if
<br />the first person in the cab would have the right to refuse to share the cab. Mr. Butler in-
<br />dicated that is what they were seeking to change. Mr. Sharp of the Yellow Cab Company, indicate
<br />that this was something that would not be abused, and the company only wanted to perform a
<br />better service. He said that most people would be willing to share the cab. Council President
<br />Parent made a motion to recommend this bill to the Council favorable, seconded by Council Member
<br />Serge. The motion carried.
<br />BILL NO. 186 -78 A BILL APPROVING MONEYS FOR THE PURPOSE OF DEFRAYING THE
<br />CETA TITLE I EXPENSES OF THE BUREAU OF EMPLOYMENT AND
<br />TRAINING FOR THE FISCAL PERIOD BEGINNING OCTOBER 1, 1977,
<br />AND ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 1978, INCLUDING ALL OUTSTANDING
<br />CLAIMS AND,OBLI GAT IONS, AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME
<br />SHALL TAKE EFFECT.
<br />BILL NO. 187 -78
<br />BILL NO. 188 -78
<br />BILL NO. 189 -78
<br />A BILL APPROVING MONEYS
<br />CETA TITLE II EXPENSES
<br />TRAINING FOR THE FISCAL
<br />AND ENDING DECEMBER 31,
<br />CLAIMS AND OBLIGATIONS,
<br />SHALL TAKE EFFECT.
<br />FOR THE PURPOSE OF DEFRAYING THE
<br />DF THE BUREAU OF EMPLOYMENT AND
<br />PERIOD BEGINNING OCTOBER 1, 1978,
<br />1978, INCLUDING ALL OUTSTANDING
<br />AND FIXING A TIME WHEN THE SAME
<br />A BILL APPROVING MONEYS FOR THE PURPOSE OF DEFRAYING
<br />THE CETA TITLE III EXPENSES OF THE BUREAU OF EMPLOYMENT
<br />AND TRAINING FOR THE FISCAL PERIOD BEGINNING OCTOBER 1,
<br />1978, AND ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 1979, INCLUDING ALL
<br />OUTSTANDING CLAIMS ANDOBLIGATIONS, AND FIXING A TIME
<br />WHEN THE SAME SHALL TAKE EFFECT.
<br />A BILL APPROVING MONEYS FOR THE PURPOSE OF DEFRAYING
<br />THE CETA TITLE VI EXPENSES OF THE BUREAU OF EMPLOYMENT
<br />AND TRAINING FOR THE FISCAL PERIOD BEGINNING OCTOBER 1,
<br />1978, AND ENDING DECEMBER 31, 1978, INCLUDING ALL
<br />OUTSTANDING CLAIMS AND OBLIGATIONS, AND FIXING A TIME
<br />WHEN.THE SAME SHALL TAKE EFFECT.
<br />This being the time heretofore set for public hearing on the above bills, proponents and opponents
<br />were given an opportunity to be heard. Mr. Elroy Kelzenberg, Director of the Bureau of Employ-
<br />ment and Training, made the presentation for the bills. He indicated these bills represented
<br />almost all of the CETA funding that comes into the City. He said that Congress has recently
<br />passed a four year extension for CETA. He indicated that the estimates from the Department of
<br />Labor: Title II, one fiscal quarter at the same level; Title III, 93% of previous year's alloca-
<br />tion; and Title VI, one fiscal quarter at the same level; do not contribute to accurate budget
<br />figures. He indicated that the figures presented on each of these bills are the ones submitted
<br />to the Department of Labor, in that they represent a reasonable figure, but they do not neces-
<br />sarily represent a final allocation. Council Member Adams indicated that the allotment was down
<br />from 1.7 million to 1.2 million and yet there were four more employees to administered the funds.
<br />She indicated this should be sent to committee for two weeks, in order to look at the differences
<br />in the budget. She made a motion to recommend these bills to the Personnel and Finance Committee,
<br />and continue them until the next scheduled Council meeting, seconced by Council Member Kopczynski.
<br />Mr. Kelzenberg indicated they were handling new title programs and they had to meet mandates set
<br />for the Department of Labor. Council Member Miller indicated that eight percent administrative
<br />costs were not excessive. The motion failed.
<br />
|