Laserfiche WebLink
3, <br />REGULAR MEETING MARCH 13, 1978 <br />REGULAR MEETING RECONVENED (CONTINUED <br />BILL NO. 23 -78 A BILL AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 4990 -68, AS AMENDED, COMMONLY <br />KNOWN AS THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND, <br />INDIANA (CHAPTER 21, MUNICIPAL CODE) (SOUTHWEST CORNER OF <br />PORTAGE .AVENUE AND THE INDIANA TOLL ROAD RIGHT -OF -WAY, CITY <br />OF SOUTH BEND, ST. JOSEPH COUNTY, INDIANA.) <br />This bill had first reading. Council Member Adams made a motion to refer this bill and petition <br />to Area Plan, seconded by Council Member Taylor. The motion carried. <br />BILL NO. 24 -78 <br />A BILL APPROPRIATING FROM THE FEDERAL ASSISTANCE <br />GRANT FUND, COMMONLY REFERRED TO AS THE GENERAL REVENUE <br />SHARING GRANT FOR VARIOUS PROGRAMS TO BE ADMINISTERED BY <br />THE-CITY OF SOUTH BEND THROUGH THE DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRA- <br />TION AND FINANCE. <br />This bill had first reading. Council Member Taylor made a motion to set this bill for public <br />hearing and second reading April 10, 1978, seconded by Council Member Dombrowski. The motion <br />carried. <br />BILL NO. 25 -78 A BILL APPROPRIATING $62,554.00 FROM THE FEDERAL ASSISTANCE <br />GRANT, COMMONLY REFERRED TO AS GENERAL REVENUE SHARING, FOR <br />THE POLICE RECRUIT PROGRAM, TO BE ADMINISTERED BY THE CITY <br />OF SOUTH BEND THROUGH THE POLICE DEPARTMENT. <br />This bill had first reading. Council Member Adams made a motion to set this bill for public <br />hearing and second reading April 10, 1978, seconded by Council Member Taylor. The motion carri <br />BILL NO. 26 -78 A BILL APPROVING A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE BUREAU OF WATER OF <br />THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA, AND A. H. CHOITZ, INC., <br />SOUTH BEND, INDIANA, FOR THE PURCHASE OF A MODEL P175 -WW <br />INGERSOLL RAND AIR COMPRESSOR IN THE AMOUNT OF $4,509.00. <br />This bill had first reading. Council Member Adams made a motion to set this bill for public <br />hearing and second reading April 10, 1978, seconded by .Council Member Taylor. The motioncarried <br />BILL NO. 27 -78 <br />A BILL APPROVING CONTRACT BETWEEN THE BUREAU OF WATER <br />OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA, AND (1) GATES <br />CHEVROLET CORP., SOUTH BEND, INDIANA, AND (2) SHAMROCK <br />FORD TRUCK SALES, INC., SOUTH BEND, INDIANA, FOR THE <br />PURCHASE OF CERTAIN MOTOR VEHICLES IN THE TOTAL AMOUNT <br />OF $47,945.30. <br />This .bill had first reading. Council Member Adams made a motion to refer this bill to the <br />Personnel and Finance Committee, and set it for public hearing and second reading April 10, 1978 <br />seconded by Council Member Taylor. The motion carried. <br />PRIVILEGE OF THE FLOOR <br />Herbert Pletcher, Chairman of the FOP Wage Neotiation Committee, read the following statement: <br />"Each year, Fraternal Order of Police Lodge #36, the designated bargaining agent for the South <br />Bend Bureau of Police, selects a wage committee by means of an 'election. The committee is com- <br />posed of five (5) members representing the three (3) Uniform Details, Detective and Services <br />Divisions. We the members of the 1978 Wage Committee, have requested this first meeting with <br />you, the Common Council of the CIty of South Bend, so that we might introduce ourselves to you. <br />We would like.to also lay some ground rules and make some preliminary requests of you at this <br />time. First of all the introductions. The committee members are as follows: Sergeant Floyd <br />Szuba- Dectective Bureau, Sergeant Tom Balogh- Services, Corporal Herb Pletcher -1st Detail (Unifori <br />Corporal Ken Milliken -2nd Detail (Uniform), Corporal Paul Hammons -3rd Detail (Uniform). We woulc <br />like to make it clear that the members of this committee were elected by the police officers <br />employed by the South Bend Bureau of Police and directed to act on their behalf in good faith <br />bargaining with the Council for wages and benefits to be realized in 1979. We further wish to <br />make it clear that no other persons or organizations has any power to negotiate for these wages <br />or benefits. All negotiations will be conducted between you, the Common Council, and the five <br />(5) committee members here in attendance representing the Bureau and its membership. Prior to <br />any agreement on any given point, in regard to wages or benefits, the membership of this com- <br />mittee will have the opportunity to discuss all aspects, in private, and then cast a vote on <br />the issue. A majority, three (3) or more, must concur or the point in issue will be rejected. <br />If the wage committee feels that an issue requires the attention of the entire membership, then <br />the committee will leave the issue open until such time as a special meeting of the F.O.P. #36 <br />can be called. In this manner the committee will be able to hear from the parties that we are <br />representing and we will then abide by their wishes. These, then, are the basic rules that this <br />committee will following during negotiations. For several years in the past it has been the <br />habit of wage committees to set down a proposal for the Council to look at in regard to wage <br />increases and benefits requested by the members of the Police Department. It has been a known <br />fact that the effort and time that was put into the drawing up of these proposals has been waste( <br />They are presented, read by the Council and from that point on they are considered to be nothing <br />more than so much scrap paper. The members of the 1978 Wage Committee feel that it is time that <br />we broke with tradition. We are therefore asking that the Council sit down and draw up a list <br />of benefits and a monetary increase that they wish to offer the membership of the South Bend <br />Bureau of Police. In doing so.there are a few things that we would like to bring to your atten- <br />tion. First of all, there are three (3) members of this Committee that were on the 1977 Committ( <br />and it is still vivid in our minds that the Council made several remarks that 1978 would be a <br />better year to talk pay riase due to the return of Police Pension Fund moneys to the City by the <br />State. This return is now a reality. <br />