REGULAR MEETING OCTOBER 10, 1977
<br />COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING
<br />Council Member Horvath asked if funds from the City Waterworks could be used to extend services.
<br />The Mayor indicated that they could be used. Mr. Phillip Barkley, 50690 Portage Road, said the
<br />last time he spoke on this purchase he posed a lot of questions and they have not been answered.
<br />He spoke against this purchase. He said changing the status as far as the City's ability to pro -
<br />vide services,.has no bearing whatsoever on th e pending annexation. He said that City taxpayers
<br />would help pay for this utility. He said there should be a fiscal plan developed before this
<br />utility is purchased. Mr. Frank Mulligan, 17250 McErlain, president of Clay Concerned Citizens,
<br />asked about the water rates. Mr. Robert Parker, Deputy City Attorney, indicated that water rates
<br />are established by the Public Service Commission. He said the present rate would pay the lease
<br />payments and generate a slight surplus. Mr. Mulligan asked how the acquisition of Clay Utilities
<br />enhances the City's propects of annexation. Mr. Parker indicated this was not a matter of annexa•
<br />tion. He said the question of annexation is not involved in this matter, just the purchase of
<br />Clay Utilities. Council Member Adams asked .why the Council was not told that this lease is not
<br />the same as the previous one. She questioned the fact that the City would be taking over the operi
<br />tion of the utility in approximately fifteen days after passage of the bill, even though all of
<br />the approvals have not been received for the purchase of the utility. She asked that paragraph
<br />thirteen be stricken from the lease, in order that the City will not be in the water business out•
<br />side of the City. Mr. Dan Manion, a local attorney, indicated he felt that it was an important
<br />factor that this was not the same lease ad the original one presented. He questioned the fact
<br />that one of the conditions for passage for this lease is that the sewer lease must also be passed
<br />Mr. Hank Waldron, 52610 Kenilworth Road, asked if the City couldforce a resident to use this
<br />utility. Mr. Parker indicated there was no way residents could be forced to hook on to the syste7
<br />Mrs. Helen Pedtke, 19367 Glendale, questioned the rush to purchase the utility. Mr. Sam Kovacevi(
<br />16607 Yorktown Road, asked if the City had the funds to purchase Clay Utilities. Mr. John
<br />Stancati, Director of Utilities, indicated that the City did not have the funds. He asked if they(
<br />would be a rate increase. Mr. Robert Parker, Deputy City Attorney, indicated there could possib.
<br />be a rate increase in the future. Mr. Kovacevich indicated there were too many unanswered questic
<br />Council Member Adams made a motion to delay this until October 24, so the Council could look
<br />at all the ramifications as to the City's responsibilities, seconded by Council Member Kopczynski
<br />Council Member Parent made a motion to restrict the discussion to the motion, seconded by Council
<br />Member Kopczynski. The motion carried. A roll call vote was taken on the motion to delay. It
<br />passed by a vote of five ayes (Council Members Serge., Kopczynski, Adams, Horvath and Parent) and
<br />four nays (Council Members Szymkowiak, Miller, Taylor and Dombrowski.) Council President Parent
<br />made a motion to recess, seconded by Council Member Kopczynski. No vote was taken on this motion
<br />BILL NO. 141 -77
<br />A BILL OF THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA,
<br />APPROVING THE LEASE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL FACILITIES OF CLAY
<br />UTILITIES, INC.
<br />This being the time heretofore set for public hearing on the above bill, proponents and opponents
<br />were given an opportunity to be heard. Mayor Peter J. Nemeth, made the presentation for the bill
<br />He said he would request that the same motion regarding the approval and ordering the filing
<br />with the Clerk's office of the notice of proof of publication. Council Member Adams made a motio
<br />to this effect, seconded by Council Member Kopczynski. The motion carried. The Mayor indicated
<br />he would request an amendment to the lease on page 11, section 13, line 11 and 14, where it says
<br />water furnished, strike and substitute the words "sewage treated." Council Member Miller made a
<br />motion to accept this amendment, seconded by Council Member Dombrowski. The motion carried.
<br />Council Member Adams made a motion to refer this to the Utilities Committee and continue public
<br />hearing and second reading until October 24, 1977, seconded by Council Member Kopczynski. Mr.
<br />Phillip Barkley, 50690 Portage Road, asked if a public hearing was going to be held on this bill.
<br />A lengthly discussion was held regarding having a public hearing on the bill. Council President
<br />Parent made a motion to continue public hearing until October 24. The motion failed for lack of
<br />a second. Chairman Horvath indicated he was going to let Mr. Barkley speak on this bill. Mr.
<br />Barkley indicated the City would not make any profit on the utility. Council Member Taylor made
<br />a motion to recess, seconded by Council President Parent. The motion carried and the meeting was
<br />recessed at 9:15 p.m., and reconvened at 9:30 p.m. Mr. Kevin Weinberg, 527 Summit Dr.', questione
<br />the parliamentary procedure regarding a motion on the floor. A lengthly discussion was held as
<br />to whether there should be public hearing on the bill. Council President Parent made a motion
<br />to rule Mr. Weinberg out of order. He said they were speaking to the motion to delay, and anyone
<br />could speak on that issue. There was no section to the motion. Chairman Horvath asked the Counc
<br />attorney for her opinion. Miss Cekanski, Council attorney, indicated that Mr. Weinberg could
<br />speak beyond the question of delay. Mr. Brunner, CityAttorney, indicated he concurred with Miss
<br />Cekanski. He said it was essential that there be a public hearing on this matter at this meeting
<br />Miss Cekanski said _ e would recommend that this meeting be opened to publichearing. Council
<br />Member Adams withdrew her motion, and Council Member Kopczynski withdrew his second. Mr. Dan
<br />Manion, local attorney, spoke against the bill and asked that it be delayed. Council Member
<br />Serge gave his reasons for changing his vote of purchase Clay. Council President Parent indicate
<br />that 1.2 million was still a realistic figure for this utility. Council Member Miller indicated
<br />he felt the purchase of Clay Utilities was good for "the City. Council Member Adams indicated tha
<br />there would be a Utilities Committee meeting on Tuesday, October 18, at 7:00 p.m. She asked the
<br />Administration to prepare a legal opinion regarding the legality of the companion leases, as well
<br />as the legal affect of paragraph 13. She made a motion to continue this bill until October 24,
<br />seconded by Council Member Kopczynski. The motion carried on a roll call vote of six ayes (Counc
<br />Members Serge, Taylor, Kopczynski, Adams, Horvath and Parent) and three nays (Council Members
<br />Szymkowiak, Miller and Dombrowski).
<br />BILL NO. 59 -77
<br />A BILL AMENDING CHAPTER 5, ANIMALS, OF THE MUNICIPAL
<br />CODE OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA.
<br />This being the time heretofore set for public hearing on the above bill, proponents and opponents
<br />were given an opportunity to be heard. Miss Kathy Cekanski, Council attorney, made the presenta-
<br />tion for the bill. She indicated she had been working with the Administration on the following
<br />amendments: Section 5 -1 (c) At Large: change to Not Within the Real Property Limits of the owner
<br />or .custodian of the animal. (.1) (2) remove "repeatedly "; (5) add "or domesticated animals "; (6)
<br />remove "unnecessarily "; (m) remove "or within the real property limits of its owner. "; Section S-
<br />in title remove "exception" and add "and Forbidding Cruelty to Animals "; add (c) "It shall be
<br />unlawful for any owner to fail to provide animals with sufficient good and wholesome food and wat
<br />proper shelter and protection from weather, needed veterinary care and humane treatment. It shal
<br />be unlawful -: for any person to inhumanely beat, torment, overload, overwork underfeed, abandon, o
<br />otherwise .abuse any animal."
<br />
|