Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR MEETING <br />COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING (CONTINUED) <br />BILL A BILL AMENDING <br />COMMONLY KNOWN <br />OF SOUTH BEND, <br />(FILLMORE ROAD <br />LANE) . <br />ORDINANCE NO. '4990 -68, AS AMENDED, <br />AS THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY <br />INDIANA (CHAPTER 21, MUNICIPAL CODE) <br />(LINDEN AVENUE) NORTH OF WESTWOOD <br />MARCH 28, 1977 <br />Council Member Kopczynski made a motion that this bill be referred back to the Residential Neigh- <br />borhood Committee, seconded by Council Member Dombrowski. The motion carried on a roll call vote <br />of six ayes (Council Members Serge, Szymkowiak, Kopczynski, Adams, Dombrowski, and Horvath) and <br />three nays (Council Members Miller, Taylor and Parent). <br />BILL NO. 14 -77 <br />A BILL ANNEXING TO AND BRINGING WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS <br />OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA, CERTAIN LAND (LAUREL WOODS). <br />This being the time heretofore set for public hearing on the above bill, proponents and opponents <br />were given an opportunity to be heard. Mr. Alex Cholis, attorney for the petitioners, made the <br />presentation for the bill. He indicated this was a voluntary annexation. He said this tract was <br />at the corner of Auten and Laurel Road, and measured approximately 915' by 1716', along with a <br />strip of land which ties it to the edge of the City limits. He said the owners propose to develop <br />a housing project on this land. He said the project will cost a total of $6,200,000, which will <br />be a nice tax base for the City. He said the terrain would not take septic tanks, and the City <br />indicated it was feasible to give them City water and sewage. Council Members Serge indicated <br />his Council committee was favorable toward this annexation. Mr. Dan Manion, attorney representin4 <br />the remonstrators against Clay Township annexation, indicated he felt there were many legal pro- <br />blems with this proposed ordinance. He indicated that this annexation would be taken to court <br />if the Council passes it. He asked the Council not-pass what he considered an illegal ordinance. <br />He indicated the City was agreeing to provide services, but he thought that strip annexation was <br />illegal. He said the courts in Indiana have indicated that it is illegal. Mr. Thomas Brunner, <br />City Attorney, indicated that his department would not submit an illegal ordinance to the Council <br />He said they hoped to never mislead the Council. Council Member Kopczynski asked how many fam- <br />ilies would be in the proposed project. Mr. James Childs, the architect for the project, indicat( <br />there would be 148 units. Council Member Kopczynski asked if all the units would have individual <br />water meters. Mr. Childs indicated there will be 76 individual meters and 76 multi - family units <br />with one meter per building. Council Member Kopczynski indicated he thought bulk meters were un- <br />fair. He asked if the service lines running into the area were owned by the City. Mr. Patrick <br />McMahon indicated they will be serviced through River Commons. He said there were lines on <br />Laurel Road, but it was the intention to connect through the River Commons area. Council Member <br />Kopczynski asked who owned the lines running to River Commons. Mayor Nemeth indicated the City <br />owned the sewer lines, and River Commons owns the water line. Council Member Kopczynski asked <br />if the City paid for the sewer lines. Mr. McMahon indicated trunk lines are constructed using <br />City money. Council Member Taylor indicated he was in favor of the annexation. Council President <br />Parent made a motion to recommend this bill favorable to the Council, seconded by Council Member <br />Miller. Council Member Adams indicated that the action they were taking was on the annexation, <br />and this property would have to come before them again for rezoning. She asked Mr. Brunner his <br />opinion on strip annexation. Mr. Brunner indicated his office would like to have the opportunity <br />to litigate any question in regard to this annexation. The motion,carried. <br />BILL NO. 31 -77 A BILL APPROPRIATING $54,846.00 FROM THE ANTI - RECESSION <br />FUND, COMMONLY REFERRED TO AS COUNTER - CYCLICAL GRANT, FOR <br />VARIOUS ADMINISTRATIVE PROGRAMS, TO BE ADMINISTERED BY THE <br />CITY OF SOUTH BEND THROUGH ITS DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION <br />AND FINANCE. <br />This being the time heretofore set for public hearing on the above bill, proponents and opponents <br />were given an opportunity to be heard. Mr. Peter Mullen, City Controller, made the presentation <br />for the bill. He said they presently have four environmental protection officers, and it is felt <br />to continue the program there should be five. He said one of these would serve as a rover among <br />the four sectors of the city handled by the other four. He said two of the four presently em- <br />ployed were being paid through Community Development, and the Department of HUD has indicated <br />they will not continue to approve of this indefinitely. He said they do not have local funds to <br />provide the salary for the environmental coordinator and are consequently requesting funds for <br />this salary. He said the accounting clerk III position is for the person handling the River Bend <br />Plaza office responsibilities. He said the Personnel Department's duties have constantly been <br />increasing, and there is insufficient money available in the Civil City budget to fund the posi- <br />tion of assistant personnel director. Council Member Adams asked how many environmental protecti( <br />officers currently are employed by the City. Mr. Mullen indicated there were two on the City <br />payroll and two that were funded from Community Development. Council Member.Aaams' asked about the <br />need for a rover protection officer. Mr. Mullen indicated that the rover would be a part -time <br />employee and fill in where needed. Council Member Adams asked what problems they have had not <br />having any assistant personnel director. Mr. Mullen indicated it had been difficult. Council <br />Member Miller asked who was doing the coordinating for environmental. Mr. Mullen indicated they <br />have combined the job with the Mayor's Action Center and the man is doing both jobs. Council <br />Member Miller made a motion to cut the environmental coordinator's salary and one environmental 1. <br />protection officer for a total of $15,825, making the total 100 account $21,191, reduce $2,500 in <br />account 600, making the total AR -1, $24,969, seconded by Council President Parent. A discussion <br />ensued'; between the Mayor and Council Member Miller regarding the funding of this position. <br />Council Member Miller indicated.he would amend his motion and have the environmental coordinator', <br />salary set at $10,800. Council President Parent indicated he wished to withdraw his second. Mr. <br />Mullen indicated the coordinator's salary was $14,000 and they were asking for the same job at <br />$10,800. The Mayor said they did not feel they could continue using Community Development money. <br />Council President Parent made a motion to recess, seconded by Council Member Szymkowiak. The <br />motion failed on a roll call vote of four ayes (Council Members Szymkowiak, Taylor,_ Horvath and <br />Parent) and five nays (Council Members Serge, Miller, Kopc °zynski, Adams and Dombrowski). Council <br />Member Serge indicated that when this program started they were going to have a protection office2 <br />in each district. The Mayor said they decided to go to four quadrants similar to the Street De- <br />partment. Council Member Serge asked about the delay in getting these violations handled. Mayor <br />Nemeth indicated that the value of the environmental officers were that they were able to take <br />care of fifty percent of the problems by talking to the violators. He said in the past there has <br />been no clean up crews except in the summer. He said they now have established a clean up crew <br />within the Street Department. <br />