EL-91
<br />REGULAR MEETING MARCH 14, 1977
<br />u
<br />COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING (CONTINUED)
<br />Council Member Parent made a motion to recess, seconded by Council Member Dombrowski. The meeti
<br />was recessed at 8:37 p.m., and reconvened at 8:58 p.m.
<br />Mr. Dan Manion, attorney representing Clay Concerned Citizens, read the following statement into
<br />the record: "As you are aware, I am the attorney for an association called the Clay Concerned
<br />Citizens. In the past few meetings of the Council, I have attended on behalf of the group mainly
<br />to monitor the proceedings with regard to the acquisition of Clay Utilities, Inc., by the City
<br />of South Bend. The purpose of this letter is simply to notify the Council of what our intentions
<br />are. We strongly object to the acquisition for many reasons, among those being, that the lease
<br />statutes are very possibly unconstitutional, that the price is much too high and will thus re-
<br />sult in an excessive burden on the present users and rate payers, that the present users and rate
<br />payers will have to pay twice since they have already paid a considerable sum for their water and
<br />sewer facilities, that the rate payers and users will be faced with extreme increases since all
<br />additions and extensions must be constructed only with revenues generated from the rates, and that
<br />the mandate in each lease that the acquisition include both the water and sewage facilities or non
<br />at all is contrary to the statute. Because of these and other objections, in the event the Counci
<br />does adopt the ordinance authorizing the execution of the leases between the City of South Bend
<br />and Clay Utilities, Inc., certain rate payers and users will file an injunction and /or a remonstra
<br />against the City's entering into these leases. If necessary, these individuals are willing to
<br />carry out their injunction to the Court of Appeals and even to the Supreme Court. Because of the
<br />many inequities that these leases will inflict upon the users and rate payers presently using the
<br />Clay Utilities system, those users and rate payers are willing to go to this extent in order to
<br />get a full legal hearing on the issues. This will, of course, take the time for execution of the
<br />lease well pastthe June lst "deadline "duto the fact that both leases provide that all appeals must
<br />be finally resolved before the lease can begin. My purpose for informing you of our intentions
<br />in this manner is to assure the Council that our motivations are in good faith, and that we in-
<br />tend no surprises or unusual tactics. Our actions are only secondarily prompted by the effect,
<br />the leases may have on annexation. We feel that this acquisition will have no effect on the an-
<br />nexation policies one way or the other, but instead will simply have a detrimental effect on the
<br />rate payers and users of the present Clay Utilities facilities. The city administration apparent]
<br />has been willing to sacrifice the excessive high cost of the facilities in exchange for what they
<br />think is a sure route to a successful annexation. Clay Utilities knows of that motivation and
<br />thus the high price tag. However, the city's motivation is based upon a very debatable legal
<br />analysis. In any event, it is our fear that the city will acquire the Clay Utilities and will
<br />operate it with something other than the best interests of the people using the facilities. It
<br />is our hope that the Council will not adopt the proposed ordinances to.execute the leases. But
<br />if it does, I have outlined what our intentions will be from that point forward. I genuinely ap-
<br />preciate the Council's cooperation and willingness to listen to all sides of this issue."
<br />Mr. Hank Waldren, 52610 Kenilworth, asked if the present sewer and water lines that have already
<br />been installed were being used at full capacity; what is the present size the trunk sewer lines;
<br />present size and capacity of water service; is the size of water and sewer capable of handling
<br />all the residents that are located on the lines that have been laid. Mr. John Stancati, Director
<br />of Utilities, indicated that the size of the sewer is sufficient and it is only used 1/5 of its
<br />capacity. He said the water lines that have already been laid can meet any capacity. He said
<br />for the most part where these lines are laid.most of the people are already tied -in. He said
<br />the existing facility is more than capable of handling what was in the area. Mr. Waldren asked if
<br />they would be willing to have a qualified engineer go over these plans with the City engineers.
<br />Mr. Stancati.indicated they would. Mr. John Horning, President of the Carriage Hills Home Owners
<br />Association, 52428 Tallyho Drive North, said there were four facts that the Council should con-
<br />sider: rate increase, payment fir the purchase agreement of Clay Utilities; pressure problems;
<br />maintenance upkeep and the retention basins. He said the residents and users of Clay Utilities
<br />are already paying excessive charges for their water and sewer, and are violently opposed to ad-
<br />ditional increases. He said they were certain that there.would be legal action taken up with the
<br />PSC by the residents and users. He said with respect to the purchase, it has been reported that
<br />the customers will windup paying for it and they have already paid for the facility. He said
<br />there were a number of complaints by residents about the water pressure, and there are pressure
<br />readings on record with the PSC. He said with regard to the rentention basins, he indicated
<br />they do have them, but they are not maintained and are unsafe. He said they were very much op-
<br />posed to the purchase by the City of Clay Utilities. Mr. Jim DeLuca, 52131 Carriage Hills Dr.,
<br />indicated he would like to know why the City would be interested in purchasing a utility that
<br />has not made a profit in ten years. Mr. Peter Nemeth, Fire Chief of Roseland, read a letter
<br />from Mr. Otis Romine, Clay Township Trustee, opposing the purchase of this facility and annexa-
<br />tion. Mr. Nemeth said he knew this water system and it was second rate. He said if the City
<br />buys it, they will be buying a "pig in a poke ". Mr. Richard Larrison, County Commissioner:, in-
<br />dicated that the County had to stop the utility from pumping raw sewage into a field next to a
<br />school. He said the County is now being asked.to help the City of Mishawaka correct the de-
<br />ficiencies in the system they purchased. Mr. Thomas Pierce, 17663 Hanson Ct., spoke about the
<br />low water pressure in Carriage Hills. Mr. Ted Jusczak, a developer in Clay Township, explained
<br />the method the eventual consumer goes about to bring service to his home or place of business,
<br />and the cost of tying -in to the service. He indicated Clay Utilities has very little invested
<br />in the whole system, and it was very small and completely inadequate. He said he was primarily
<br />interested in the people of South Bend and Clay Township getting a fair deal. Mr. Kevin Weinberg
<br />527 Summit, spoke in favor of the City purchasing this utility. Mrs. Louvenia Simmons (Cain)
<br />indicated she hoped the CouncilWould have an open mind on this purchase, and come up with a posi-
<br />tive answer. Mrs. Jane Swan, 2022 Swygart, spoke regarding the annexation of Clay Township and.
<br />the fact that no community would willingly come into the city if you tell them your dying. She
<br />said if the City intended to buy Clay Utilities, she would suggest the Council and Administration
<br />pay heed to the last two sentences of Roger Parent's press release "I believe that common sense
<br />and the public interest should prevail in any transaction in which the City participates." Dr.
<br />Lillian Stanton, 919 Oak Ridge, said she was a South Bend resident and intended to stay here. Sh(
<br />said that in the(past she has supported appropriations that have benefited the community. She
<br />indicated that cities should stay within their budget, and that it was about time something was
<br />done to reduce the deficit in South Bend. Mr. David Wells, 5104 Bloomfield Way, spoke regarding
<br />the sewage system in the county and its relationship to disease. He indicated he was in favor
<br />of the purchase of Clay Utilities.
<br />
|