M
<br />REGULAR MEETING MARCH 14, 1977
<br />u
<br />COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING (CONTINUED
<br />BILL NO. 32 -77
<br />A BILL FOR ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATION FROM THE GENERAL
<br />PARK FUND IN THE AMOUNT OF $75,000.00 TO ACCOUNT
<br />NUMBER 722.0 PROPERTIES, MOTOR EQUIPMENT.
<br />This being the time heretofore s
<br />were given an opportunity to be
<br />the presentation for the bill.
<br />Park Fund, due to receiving more
<br />since the entire motor equipment
<br />now in need of purchasing motor
<br />ranger is a 1967 model with over
<br />dollars for complete overhaul.
<br />chase a new aerial tower which c
<br />Member Dombrowski made a motion
<br />Council Member Szymkowiak. The
<br />BILL NO. 24 -77 A BILL OF THE
<br />BEND, INDIANA,
<br />FACILITIES OF
<br />et for public hearing on the above bill, proponents and opponent
<br />heard. Mr. James Seitz, Superintendent of Public Parks, made
<br />He indicated there was a surplus of about $150,000 in the Genera
<br />money from various tax funds than was anticipated. He said tha
<br />account was deleted from the 1977 budget, the Park Department w
<br />equipment and a new high ranger. He said their present high -
<br />60,000 miles. He said it would require four or five thousand
<br />He said in their opinion, the City would be better off to pur-
<br />osts between thirty -five and forty thousand dollars. Council
<br />to recommend this bill to the Council favorable, seconded by
<br />motion carried.
<br />COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH
<br />APPROVING THE LEASING OF WATERWORKS
<br />CLAY UTILITIES.
<br />Council President Parent made a motion that public hearing be hE
<br />the lease for sewage at this time, but the Council vote separatE
<br />Council Member Adams. The motion carried. Council Member HorvZ
<br />Before the presentation and public hearings on the next two bill
<br />be made. It has been determined that for presentation purposes
<br />testimony: on the Lease - Purchase Agreement for the Waterworks FE
<br />Agreement for the Sewage Disposal Facilities of Clay Utilities,
<br />However, the Chair would like to remind all persons present that
<br />on each of these bills is: (1) to determine whether there is a
<br />each lease, and (2) to determine whether the rental payments of
<br />to Clay Utilities, Inc., are fair and reasonable. When giving
<br />which lease agreement you are addressing. Next, the Chair woul�
<br />c.7i ch +n ar,cak nn i-hPGa i-wn hi 1 1 S _ that in liaht of the fact that
<br />ld on this bill, as well as
<br />ly for each bill, seconded by
<br />th read the following statement:
<br />s, two announcements must first
<br />only, the Council will allow
<br />cilities, and the Lease - Purchase
<br />Inc., to be presented together.
<br />the purpose of public hearings
<br />necessity for the execution of
<br />each lease which are to be paid
<br />our remarks please indicate
<br />like to remind all persons who
<br />there is an annexation lawsuit
<br />pending on Clay Township, that no remarks should be given which in any way speak to the merits
<br />of that case. Any remarks which are offered on the issue of annexation will be ruled out of
<br />order unless they are to prove that each of the facilities is with,,in the distance conditions
<br />of the State law which govern these leases. Mr. Thomas Brunner, City Attorney, questioned the
<br />time the hearing was advertised, he indicated this hearing should be heard at 7:00 p.m. The ad-
<br />vertising was brought to the Chambers, and it indicated that the hearing was scheduled for 6:00
<br />p.m. A .discussion- _en"sued.as to whether the first or last advertising would take precedent.
<br />Council President Parent made a motion that the Council hear this matter as scheduled in the
<br />last advertising, seconded.by Council Member Kopczynski. The motion carried.
<br />This being the time heretofore set for public hearing on the above bill, proponents and opponent!
<br />were given an opportunity to be heard. Mr. John Stancati, Director of Utilities, introduced Mr.
<br />Stravinski, of Murphy Consultants, who gave an explanation of their study. He said their firm
<br />made a valuation of the cost of Clay Utilities. He said they were given information by Clay
<br />Utilities which provided them with information on the actual costs of the facility. He said the,
<br />utilized the data given to them by Clay Utilities to determine the total cost of the water and
<br />sewer system.. He said there were no attempts made to varify the size of sewer or water mains.
<br />He said they opened several manholes to check sewer size and dlove the entire system to determine
<br />the location of the fire hydrants. He said they took all data and updated the cost from the
<br />date of installation. He -said they depreciated the cost of the facility of 12% per year. He
<br />said they also depreciated the cost of their private evaluation of the cost of the facility and
<br />depreciated it by 1z% per year. He said the cost they arrived at is the original cost accord-
<br />ing to the information supplied by Clay Utilities, without an engineering service. He said the
<br />sewer system cost was $918,636 and the water system $611,389, for a total of 1.53 million. He
<br />said the depreciated original cost was 2.13 million and the replacement cost, according to their
<br />evaluation as of December 31, 1976, was 2.38 million. He said there was also another item,
<br />which was the Aqua facility, and they determined its present valuation was $92,985. Mr. Patrick
<br />McMahon, Director of Public - Works, indicated that the City Engineering Department was requested
<br />to review the work done by Murphy Consultants and they found it to be an outstanding job. Mr.
<br />Dave Wells, Manager of the Bureau of Design and Administration indicated that over the years
<br />they had become familiar with this system. He said they had T.V.'d portions of the system, and
<br />in his opinion the system was brand new. Mr. William Dillon, Waterworks Engineer, indicated
<br />he had been investigating this water system for two years, and it was all in good working condi-
<br />tion. He said it was adequate size and an adequate water system. He said the fire hydrants
<br />required nozzle adapters and special wrenches to open. He said the system was acceptable in
<br />engineering aspects. Mr. Peter Mullen, City Controller, indicated his office had been working
<br />closely with Mr. Stancati during the course of negotiations, and assisted him in compiling the
<br />cost figures. He said they feel it is in the best interest of the citizens of South Bend that
<br />Clay Utilities be purchased. Mr. Walter.Lantz, Chief Deputy Controller, indicated that revenues
<br />for 1976 to Clay Utilities was $236,164, and of this amount $43,640 came from residential custom
<br />$113,011 from motels, $54,904 from apartments and $24,612 from commercial establishments. He
<br />said the revenue growth had increased 120% in the last four years. He said that most of the
<br />operating costs being born by Clay Utilities will not be required for the City. He said that
<br />Clay Utilities has 333 customers, which is only an increase to the City of .8 %, therefore,
<br />there is no reason the City's present staff can not handle this small of an increase. He said
<br />that in effect, the majority of Clay Utilities' expenses would not be cost to the City. Mr.
<br />Robert Parker, Chief Deputy Attorney, indicated that the State had developed statutm for water -
<br />works . and sewage facilities that were enacted in 1975. He indicated that only revenue from the
<br />users could be used to pay the lease purchase. He said if condemnation were to take place, it
<br />is the feeling of the Administration that the approach that would be used would be the cost
<br />approach, replacement value less deprecation. He said the contract has been negotiated with no
<br />regard to goodwill and going value, or the value of natural resources.
<br />S,
<br />
|