Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR MEETING JULY 26, 1976 <br />COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING (CONTINUED) <br />Mr. Chester Zakrocki, 3620 Brentwood, spoke in favor of the rezoning. He indicated many doctor'; <br />offices are in residential areas. <br />Mr. Robert Dehaan, 4030 Miami spoke in favor of the rezoning. He said he has never seen any con• <br />gestion problem around the office, or a traffic problem. <br />Mr. Greg Swick, 1132 Byron, spoke regarding the traffic congestion. He said he did not think 20 <br />parking spaces would alleviate the problem. <br />Council Member Dombrowski made a motion to continue this hearing until August 9, seconded by <br />Council Member Kopczynski. <br />Council Member Taylor said he did not think the hearing should be continued. Council Member <br />Miller said he would like to discuss the ordinance further. Council Member Adams indicated she <br />would like this continued until August 9. She said this was an existing situation, and she <br />would like to look into this further. <br />The motion failed on a roll call vote of three ayes (Council Members Kopczynski, Adams and Dom- <br />browski) and five nays (Council Members Serge, Miller, Taylor, Horvath and Parent). <br />Council Member Serge indicated that the doctor had purchased more property in that area and he <br />wanted to know what he intended to do with it. <br />Mr. Hardig indicated that the doctor owned a rental property one door away from the building in <br />question. He said the doctor was just renting the property, and he had no plans to change the <br />exterior of his present building. Council Member Serge said the Council was not known to approv <br />"spot" zoning. Council Member Serge wanted to know if the doctor planned to expand his business <br />by bringing another doctor in with him. Mr. Hardig indica t--d that he did not believe "B" re- <br />sidential was "spot" zoning and the doctor had no such plans to bring in another doctor. <br />Council Member Taylor said he would like to know how long the doctor resided in the home in <br />question. Dr. Kotoske said he purchased the home in 1968 while he was an intern, and he and his <br />family remodeled it. He said they lived there less than one year. Council Member Taylor asked <br />why he did not take his practice when he moved. Dr. Kotoske indicated he thought it was a <br />good location and the office was an asset to the neighborhood. Council Member Taylor indicated <br />that the doctor has had so much success that he has simply outgrown an "A" residential area. <br />He said this was putting the Council in a position of granting a special favor. He said the <br />law has to be equally applied to all citizens. <br />Council President Parent asked the reason they were requesting the Council to continue hearing <br />on this matter. Mr. Hardig indicated that this rezoning was very important to the petitioner, <br />a lot of things were made known to them recently. He said there have been many rumors and they <br />wanted to trace them down. <br />Council President Parent indicated the City had tremendous difficulty in enforcing zoning laws. <br />He said he thought the Council has a right to preserve, protect and strengthen the neighborhoods.', <br />He said if the Council was not going to enforce or obey the zoning laws they should be taken off <br />the books. He indicated the law states that the doctor has to live in the house, in order to <br />have his office in that location. <br />Council Member Kopczynski said he thought this was a very important issue, and he thought the <br />petition against rezoning should be looked at very carefully. He said for these reasons he <br />would like to see this continued until August 9. Council Member Adams said it was her under- <br />standing that a cease and desist order came about after you sought to change the zoning. Dr. <br />Kotoske indicated that was correct. Council Member Adams indicated that since the doctor was <br />not going to increase his staff, the increase of eight parking spaces would help the traffic <br />problem. Dr. Kotoske said he would like to mention that he practices internal medicine and <br />does not treat a lot of people a day. He said he rarely sees more than 35 people a day. He <br />said he only practices four days a week, and the real traffic problem is with the golfers on <br />Friday through Sunday. Council Member Adams said with thirteen spaces, you would have nine <br />available for patients. She wanted to know if the doctor would ever have that many. Dr. Kotosk <br />said he books four patients an hour. <br />Council Member Miller questioned the sentence in the zoning ordinance which states "All prior <br />ordinances affecting the above described tracts of land in conflict herewith are repealed ". He <br />said it would seem to him that this would repeal all of Broadmoor. <br />Mr. Thomas Brunner, City Attorney, said he had not had an opportunity to look at this language, <br />but he would suggest that it was form language. Mr. Hardig indicated this was form and perhaps <br />it could be made clearer. Council Member Miller said it would seem to him this would have to <br />be changed. Mr. Hardig indicated that since the ordinance describes only the land owned by Dr. <br />Kotoske, this was all that was effected. Mr. Brunner said he did not pretend to be an expert <br />on zoning, but he believed Mr. Hardig's interpretation was the correct one. Council Member Mill <br />said he would feel more confortable if this would be cleared up. Mr. Brunner indicated his <br />staff would look into this situation. <br />Council Member Serge indicated that the neighbors have been living with this condition for eight <br />or nine years and now that the doctor is attempting to better the location, they are disturbed. <br />Council Member Dombrowski indicated that when he made the motion to continue the public hearing, <br />he did so in order that both sides could correctly present their case. He said now, he would <br />possibly like to go out and look at the location himself. He said he would again like to make <br />a motion that this hearing be continued until August 9, seconded by Council Member Kopczynski. <br />Council President Parent said he would like to speak in favor of that motion. He said this was <br />a complex issue and time should be taken to look at what impact it may have. The motion carried <br />