REGULAR MEETING MAY 10, 1976
<br />Council Member Serge indicated he thought the resolution should be passed to meet:our obligation.
<br />Council Member Taylor said his only desire was to keep the garages as competitive as possible. H
<br />asked Mr. Mullen if it were true that to make the garages pay for themselves, we would have to
<br />think in terms of a monthly rate of $40 to $45 per month. Mr. Mullen indicated that was correct.
<br />He said that no one on the Council was going to be taking a vote to end subsidization, and we are
<br />going to be subsidizing the downtown parking situation for a while. He indicated he wanted to ke
<br />our parking rates as competitive as possible as long as possible.
<br />Council President Parent indicated that the Commission has discussed the possibility of providing
<br />some free parking. He said he thought the motivation behind the two resolutions on the agenda wa
<br />very good. He said he was concerned that even the goals of receiving more money at an increased
<br />rate may not be obtained. He said he would be in favor of subsidizing parking even further, be-
<br />cause it would make us more competitive in getting additional businesses downtown, and have an ex
<br />panded tax base, therefore, having more tax money. He said that those on the Commission were ver
<br />concerned that increasing the rates would not produce more money, especially on the flat lots be-
<br />cause there are other lots nearby that are competitively priced, so we are not sure if we increas
<br />the rates that some people will not go elsewhere. He said he was against the adoption of both
<br />resolutions on the agenda, and would prefer the Board of Works adopt a resolution reflecting the
<br />Commission's report.
<br />Council Member Szymkowiak, indicated it was the Council's idea to have a parking commission, now
<br />we have the advice of the parking Commission, and we should live by it.
<br />Council President Parent said there was a motion on the floor to defeat both resolutions, and I
<br />would like to ask Council Member Taylor to withdraw it and deal with both individually.
<br />Council Member Taylor said he moved on resolution A to reject the resolution and to write a lettez
<br />so stating to the Board of Public Works our reasons and that we state in the letter that we will
<br />support the recommendations of the Study Commission. Council President Parent said that the sense
<br />of the motion was to strike the resolution from the record and tell the reasons why. The motion
<br />was seconded by Council Member Horvath. Council President Parent said it had been moved and
<br />seconded that this resolution be struck from the record and a letter be sent to the Mayor giving
<br />the reasons why. A roll call vote was taken, and after a clarification, the roll call vote was
<br />five ayes (Council Members Szymkowiak, Taylor, Adams, Horvath and Parent) and three nays (Council
<br />Members Serge, Miller Kopczynski). The motion carried and the resolution will be struck from the
<br />record.
<br />Council Member Taylor made a motion on Resolution B
<br />so stating to the Board of Public Works our reasons
<br />support the recommendations of the Study Commission
<br />call vote was taken and the motion passed with five
<br />Horvath and Parent) and three nays (Council Members
<br />will be struck from the record.
<br />to reject the resolution and to write a lett
<br />and that we state in the letter that we will
<br />seconded by Council Member Horvath. A roll
<br />ayes (Council Member Szymkowiak, Taylor, Ada
<br />Serge, Miller, Kopczynski). The resolution
<br />Council Member Horvath made a motion to recess, seconded by Council Member Taylor. The motion
<br />carried. The regular meeting of the Common Council was recessed at 9:00 p.m., and reconvened
<br />at 9:15 p.m.
<br />Mr. John Stancati, Manager of the Water'Works, said a question had arisen in regard to the resolu-
<br />tions he submitted and he would like the Council to strike the word resolution and insert ordinanc
<br />on resolutions C through G. Council Member Kopczynski made a motion that resolutions C, D, E, F,
<br />G, be struck from the record, seconded by Council Member Taylor. The motion carried.
<br />ORDINANCES, FIRST READING
<br />ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND SUPPLEMENTING
<br />CHAPTER 40 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF SOUTH
<br />BEND, INDIANA (2201 E. Jefferson Blvd.).
<br />This ordinance had first reading. Council Member Horvath made a motion to refer the ordinance
<br />petition to Area Plan, seconded by Council Member Adams. The motion carried.
<br />ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND SUPPLEMENTING
<br />CHAPTER 40 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF SOUTH
<br />BEND, INDIANA (4104 S. MIAMI STREET).
<br />This ordinance had first reading. Council Member Horvath made a motion to refer the ordinance
<br />petition to Area Plan, seconded by Council Member Adams. The motion carried.
<br />ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND SUPPLEMENTING
<br />CHAPTER 40 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF SOUTH
<br />BEND, INDIANA (Northeast corner Miami St.
<br />and Jackson Road).
<br />This ordinance had first reading. Council Member Horvath made a motion to refer the ordinance
<br />petition to Area Plan, seconded by Council Member Adams. The motion carried.
<br />ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO.
<br />4990 -68, AS AMENDED, COMMONLY KNOWN
<br />AS THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY
<br />OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA (CHAPTER 21,
<br />MUNICIPAL CODE) (3029 Linden Road).
<br />This ordinance had first reading. Council Member Taylor made a motion to refer the ordinance and
<br />petition to Area Plan, seconded by Council Member Horvath. The motion carried.
<br />ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A CONTRACT
<br />BETWEEN THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND,
<br />INDIANA THROUGH ITS BOARD OF PUBLIC
<br />SAFETY AND THE SCOTTSDALE MALL FOR
<br />THE DESIGNATION AND REGULATION OF
<br />
|