REGULAR MEETING
<br />REGULAR MEETING RECONVENED (CONTINUED)
<br />MARCH 22, 1976
<br />Council Member Taylor indicated that the problem was that one smoker was not touched, so how can
<br />you interpret the law, there seems to be a double standard.
<br />Council Member Dombrowski asked Mr. Carrington if Chief Borkowski was out of town. Mr. Carringtc
<br />indicated he was not there because he did not know this would be on the agenda. Council Member
<br />Dombrowski said he thought when an issue like this comes up, the chief should be there to answer.
<br />Council Member Horvath indicated the Little League smoker would probably be patronized by the
<br />parents and they would be donating to the cause. He said even the FOP Lodge has gambling, and
<br />if they are picking on certain organizations it was wrong. Mr. Brunner, City Attorney, said
<br />the police was as clear as they could make it. He said in regard to the specific question as
<br />to whether this type of activity will be sanctioned by the City, the City will endeavor to enfor
<br />the law wherever possible.
<br />Council Member Taylor asked if church bingo was legal. Mr. Brunner indicated it was illegal,
<br />ever, there was a distinct difference between bingo and professional gambling.
<br />Council President Parent indicated that if bingo was not considered legitimate, it must be con-
<br />sidered illegal, and the administration was implying they would not enforce the law against bin
<br />Mr. Brunner indicated the only distinction he was trying to draw was that of analysis. He said
<br />if they had to devote their research to a certain area, it will be professional gambling.
<br />Council Member Szymkowiak indicated that bingo was the only entertainment for a lot of our seni
<br />citizens. Mr. Brunner said bingo is still technically a crime but we are trying to apply our r
<br />sources to a more pressing problem, professional gambling.
<br />Council President Parent asked the Clerk's office to write a letter to the mayor with a copy to
<br />the city attorney and chief of police, asking for a statement of policy in regard to the enforc
<br />ment of gambling laws.
<br />Mr. Gene Evans, Executive Secretary of the Civic Planning Association questioned parliamentary
<br />procedure in regard to the motion to amend and adopt the resolution pertaining to the parking
<br />fees, since this was one in the same motion. He urged some Council Member who voted nay to make
<br />a motion to reconsider the adoption of the resolution.
<br />Council Member Dombrowski made a motion to recess to consider this request, seconded by Council
<br />Member Szymkowiak. The meeting was recessed at 9:12 p.m.
<br />REGULAR MEETING - RECONVENED
<br />Be it remembered that the regular meeting of the Common Council of the City of South Bend recon-
<br />vened in the Council Chambers at 9:31 p.m., Council President Parent presiding, and nine members
<br />present.
<br />Council President Parent_ asked the council attorney to give an opinion. Ms. Kathleen Cekanski,
<br />Council Attorney, said she and the city attorney had consulted Robert's Rules and the motion
<br />to amend and adopt was proper. However, if you would like to take action, it would be possible
<br />for the prevailing side on the resolution to do so.
<br />Council President Parent indicated they would finish the privilege of the floor first.
<br />Mrs. Jane Swan, 2022 Swygart, said there was an article in the newspaper concerning the Supreme
<br />Court's rules the city does not violate constitutional rights when it requires an employee to
<br />live in the city limits.
<br />Council President Parent said he read the same thing and rejoiced. He said he was going to ask
<br />the council attorney to prepare a resolution to state the Council's intention on this. The
<br />entire Council appeared to agree this was a very good ruling. Council Member Taylor said the
<br />Council should go on record as being in support of this.
<br />Mrs. Irene Mutzl, 320 Parkovash, said she felt the new administration should be given a chance.
<br />She said she hoped when they took up the parking resolution again it would be passed. She said
<br />if the administration wants to change and test the parking fees, she felt the Council should go
<br />along with them. She said the Council wanted to study the parking question, and there has been
<br />plenty of time over the years to study, and they should pass the resolution and keep right on
<br />studying..
<br />Council Member Adams made a motion to again take up resolution 9C, seconded by Council Member
<br />Taylor. Council President Parent asked why she was asking the Council to reconsider. Council
<br />Member Adams said it seems the Council is not ready to decide on this issue and "I would like
<br />to leave it alive and well." She said she would like after this has been passed, for this to go
<br />to the Commission, and perhaps they will have a decision for us by our April 5 meeting. The
<br />motion passed with a roll call vote of nine ayes (Council Members Serge, Szymkowiak, Miller,
<br />Taylor, Kopczynski, Adams, Dombrowski, Horvath and Parent).
<br />Council Member Taylor made a motion to send this resolution to the South Bend Parking Facility
<br />Study Commission, seconded by Council Member Adams.
<br />Council President Parent said they were reconsidering the motion and the motion at that time was
<br />to amend by changing the date of May 1 and to adopt. There were many questions as to parliament
<br />procedure on reconsidering the resoltuion.
<br />Council Member Adams said when she initiated this she asked they reconsider the resolution, not
<br />reconsider the motion. She said if they reconsider the resolution, if that is in order, then
<br />Council Member Taylor's motion is in order.
<br />Council Member Taylor made a motion for a short recess, seconded by Council Member Miller, the
<br />motion carried, the meeting recessed at 8:50 p.m.
<br />
|