Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR MEETING OCTOBER 20, 1975 <br />COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING (CONTINUED) <br />Councilman Miller indicated that $170,000 had been budgeted for 1975 with an additional $36,000 <br />from the utility budgets. He stated that $206,000 would be the total. He stated that, with a <br />43G average price times the 530 gallons, the amount would be $230,000. He felt there might be a <br />need for an additional $24,000 before the end of the year. Mr. Farrand indicated that Councilman <br />Miller had not figured diesel fuel in his computation. He stated that, in 1975, the price for <br />diesel fuel was 34� plus 8� tax. This involved a tax payment to the state. Councilman <br />Kopczynski wondered about the administration's policy in the purchase of automobiles to reduce the <br />consumption of gasoline. Mr. Farrand indicated that the administration had tried to purchase <br />smaller vehicles. Councilman Kopczynski wondered about the last few vehicles purchased, and Mr. <br />Farrand indicated that the only major purchase of vehicles had been police vehicles. Mr. Michael <br />Vance, Chief Deputy Controller, indicated that the police vehicles were four -door sedans with V -8 <br />automatic engines with no air - conditioning. Councilman Kopczynski wondered about the purchase of <br />automobiles for department heads. Mr. Vance indicated that a Chevrolet Nova, six - cylinder, <br />automatic had been purchased for the Human Rights Commission. Councilman Kopczynski wondered if <br />any larger vehicles had been purchased recently. Mr. Vance indicated that the Substandard <br />Department had purchased a Chevrolet Nova with a small V -8 engine. Councilman Kopczynski wondered <br />if any Vegas or Pintos had been purchased, and Mr. Vance indicated that a couple of these vehicles <br />were leased through the Manpower Program but had not been purchased. Councilman Kopczynski felt <br />there was no policy on the purchase of smaller cars, and Mr. Farrand disagreed, indicating that <br />he felt economy vehicles had been purchased and a policy was followed. <br />Councilman Serge made a motion that the ordinance be recommended favorably to the Common Council, <br />seconded by Councilman Szymkowiak. The motion carried. <br />ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE APPROPRIATING $25,000.00 FROM <br />THE FEDERAL ASSISTANCE GRANT COMMONLY <br />REFERRED TO AS GENERAL REVENUE SHARING, <br />FOR VARIOUS PUBLIC SAFETY PROGRAMS, TO BE <br />ADMINISTERED BY THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND <br />THROUGH ITS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY. <br />This being the time heretofore set for public hearing on the above ordinance, proponents and <br />opponents were given an opportunity to be heard. Mr. Michael Carrington, Director of the <br />Department of Public Safety, made the presentation for the ordinance. He indicated that this <br />request would continue to fund the overtime foot patrol program for 1975, for a total of $90,000. <br />He indicated that the amount of $90,000 had been allocated in the 1976 budget so revenue sharing <br />funds would no longer be used. <br />Councilman Miller indicated that the Council had requested that quarterly reports be made on the <br />statistics of the program. He asked that this information be furnished to the Council. Mr. <br />Carrington indicated that the value of the program could not be proven in a statistical manner. <br />He stated that the program would not show a large number of arrests because the program was being <br />utilized to deter crime. Councilman Miller indicated that, in the past, quarterly reports had <br />been furnished the Council for the areas in which the patrol had been utilized. He felt it was <br />beneficial for the Council to monitor the program. He wondered if the money was totally being <br />used for the program, and Mr. Carrington indicated that it was. Councilman Miller felt there was <br />no question that the overtime foot patrol program had been valuable. He wondered if perhaps more <br />of the policemen should be used in the future. Mr. Carrington talked about the value of the pro- <br />gram to the city and its flexibility. Councilman Serge indicated that he was pleased with the <br />program and the men were moved from one area to another area when it was warranted. He felt con- <br />tact with the officers walking the beat and the residents in an area was important. Mr. Carringt <br />indicated that the men were encouraged to do that. Council President Parent felt the way the pro <br />gram was being utilized was the correct way. <br />Council President Parent made a motion that the ordinance be recommended favorably to the Common <br />Council, seconded by Councilman Serge. Councilman Szymkowiak indicated that he agreed with <br />Councilman Serge that the officers should make contact with the residents. He felt officers <br />familiar with a certain area should be put into that area on the foot patrol. Mr. Carrington <br />indicated that, whenever possible, officers familiar with a certain area were assigned to that <br />area. He personally knew of some officers living and working in the same area. Councilman <br />Kopczynski referred to an incident where a burglary was in process and had been reported. Some <br />officers familiar with the area but not called responded within three minutes, yet the beat car <br />took twenty minutes. He did not feel the city was using its men to the fullest extent. He felt <br />it was unfortunate that revenue sharing funds were still used because he felt there was no progres <br />in that direction. Councilman Horvath felt the foot patrol program was a definite deterrent to <br />crime. He talked about the problem of some officers riding in cars during inclement weather. He <br />hoped this would not occur again and that the foot patrol program would be just that - -foot patrol. <br />The motion carried, with Councilman Kopczynski opposing. <br />ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE APPROPRIATING $5,000.00 FROM <br />THE FEDERAL ASSISTANCE GRANT COMMONLY <br />REFERRED TO AS GENERAL REVENUE SHARING, <br />FOR VARIOUS PUBLIC SAFETY PROGRAMS, TO BE <br />ADMINISTERED BY THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND <br />THROUGH ITS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY. <br />This being the time heretofore set for public hearing on the above ordinance, proponents and <br />opponents were given an opportunity to be heard. Mr. Cappy Gagnon, 2901 Miami, Director of the <br />Youth Services Bureau, made the presentation for the ordinance. He stated that, at the beginning <br />of 1975, $26,000 had been requested to supplement the federal money received. Additional federal <br />money had been anticipated during 1975; however, he felt the department would;'be short approxi- <br />mately $5,000. He indicated that, in the 1976 budget, $46,000 was allocated. He indicated that <br />he had hoped to avoid coming back to the Council; however, the department was about $5,000 short <br />for 1975. He felt the bureau had done a good job in maintaining its services and he felt this <br />would be the last request for appropriations from the Council. <br />Councilman Serge wondered if any thought had been given to make the Youth Services Bureau self - <br />supporting. Mr. Gagnon indicated that the only way to do this would be to charge a fee, and he <br />felt this would not be feasible in rendering services. Councilman Serge asked about the age limit <br />involved in the program. Mr. Gagnon indicated that 90% of those involved were between the ages o: <br />