REGULAR MEETING JULY 28 1975
<br />COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING (CONTINUED)
<br />call vote on Councilman Miller's motion to delete the increase in the Firefighter First Class
<br />position. The motion lost by a vote of five nays (Councilmen Serge, Szymkowiak, Taylor, Newburn
<br />and Parent) and four ayes (Councilmen Miller, Kopczynski, Horvath and Nemeth).
<br />There was a call for the question on the original motion to amend the ordinance made by
<br />Councilman Taylor. A roll call vote was again requested. The motion carried by a roll call vote
<br />of nine ayes (Councilmen Serge, Szymkowiak, Miller, Taylor, Kopczynski, Horvath, Nemeth, Newburn
<br />and Parent).
<br />Firefighter Tim Brassell of the Wage Committee wondered if the pension plan for the policemen
<br />would be increased and not that of the firefighters. He did not feel this should be so.
<br />Councilman Miller felt there was a difference because of the change in the date to December 31,
<br />1975. He felt a legal interpretation was required. Council President Parent felt there was a
<br />difference of six months; however, the concept was the same. He stated that the attorney for the
<br />policemen had felt there would not be a conflict. Firefighter Brassell indicated that the police
<br />pension had increased $240 last year over the firefighters. Councilman Taylor stated that the
<br />Council had cut in half the disparity that existed. Firefighter Brassell stated that there was a
<br />surplus within the salary account in the Fire Department of approximately $40,000. He wondered
<br />why this surplus could not be used for increased salaries and clothing allowance. He talked about
<br />the transfers of funds which occur within the salary account during the year, and he wondered why
<br />a transfer could not be made for the $40,000 surplus in order that it could be used for salaries i
<br />1976. He stated that he wondered where the city's priorities were at times. He talked about the
<br />possibility of collective bargaining in the future. Firefighter Randy Magdalinski, Chairman of th
<br />Wage Committee, thanked the Council for appropriating additional funds for the paramedics. He
<br />indicated that, prior to the amendment concerning the $300 for the policemen, there would have bee
<br />some officers who would not have received the $416 increase. He stated that now, at least they
<br />would receive no less than $300. He indicated that 23 firefighters would be eliminated from the
<br />pay raise for next year unless such a provision was included in the salary ordinance. Firefighter
<br />Don Luckett felt the three lowest ranked salaries should be increased the same amount as the other
<br />ranks. Mr. Evans indicated that there was a difference in the clothing allowance for policemen
<br />and firemen. He stated that the association hoped the allowance would be the same for both
<br />departments. Councilman Miller indicated that it was difficult to negotiate wages. He felt it wa
<br />understandable that each side would present positions which would favor one side. He felt this
<br />was a disadvantage to the Council because it had to look at the total picture. He also felt that
<br />the policemen and firefighters have conducted themselves in a professional manner throughout the
<br />negotiations, and he commended the officers for this. He stated that the Council's efforts showed
<br />that it wished to improve some of the inequities that existed. He indicated that the police and
<br />fire pensions were a "hang -up" and would continue to be. He stated that the city did not know how
<br />this pension would increase in future years and this presented a problem. Council President
<br />Parent felt that, in view of the financial condition of the city, the ordinance, as amended, was
<br />fair although not exactly what he would have proposed.
<br />Council President Parent made a motion that the ordinance be recommended favorably, as amended,
<br />to the Common Council, seconded by Councilman Taylor. Chairman Newburn requested a roll call vote
<br />The motion carried by a vote of nine ayes (Councilmen Serge, Szymkowiak, Miller, Taylor, Kopczynsk
<br />Horvath, Nemeth, Newburn and Parent).
<br />Councilman Taylor made a motion to recess, seconded by Council President Parent. The motion
<br />carried, and the Committee of the Whole recessed at 8:40 p.m. Reconvened at 9:00 p.m.
<br />ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE FIXING MAXIMUM SALARIES AND
<br />WAGES OF APPOINTED OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES
<br />OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA, FOR
<br />THE YEAR 1976.
<br />This being the time heretofore set for public hearing on the abc
<br />opponents were given an opportunity to be heard. Mr. James Roer
<br />sentation for the ordinance. He stated that the ordinance inch
<br />policemen and firefighters. He stated that what was recommender
<br />across - the -board of $500 or 24 � an hour for the hourly personn(
<br />last several months, there had been many items requested by the
<br />counteroffered. Only one of the issues had come to the Council;
<br />He referred to his letter dated July 10th which had been sent tc
<br />the entire negotiations. He stated that the union ratification
<br />the proposed ordinance had been filed in the Clerk's Office. HE
<br />change in the ratification in that, rather than the 244 an hour
<br />be made with $84 towards dependent hospitalization by the city.
<br />the Teamsters Local 364. which consisted of approximately 350 c:
<br />ve ordinance, proponents and
<br />er, City Attorney, made the pre -
<br />ded basically all employees except
<br />in the ordinance was an increase
<br />1. He explained that, over the
<br />union and all the requests had bee
<br />that being the 25G per hour rate.
<br />the Council, in which he summariz
<br />had occurred on the evening that
<br />stated that there was a slight
<br />increase, a 20� an hour increase
<br />Mr. Michael Lawrence, representin
<br />tv emplovees, indicated that the
<br />committee had met with the Council and had hoped for a greater increase. The total package;
<br />however, was ratified on July 9th with the 20fi an hour increase and the $84 contribution by the
<br />city toward dependent hospitalization. Mr. Gene Evans, Executive Secretary of the Civic Planning
<br />Association, questioned the salary of the Greenskeeper in the Park Department. He indicated that
<br />the salary had been raised from $10,000 to $13,000. Mr. James Seitz, Director of the Department
<br />of Public Parks, explained that a $3,000 increase had been proposed because of the qualifications
<br />and training of the greenskeepers. He talked about the amount of money put into the city's golf
<br />courses and the need to maintain the courses in the best way possible. He felt sure the revenue
<br />from the gold courses would be increased. He indicated that the average greenskeeper salary
<br />ranged from $17,000 to $20,000. Mr. Evans wondered about the $618 increase for the Director of
<br />the Newman Center, and Mr. Seitz explained that the department was trying to equalize the salaries
<br />of the directors for the centers. Mr. Evans indicated that there was a large increase made in the
<br />position of Director of the Communications Bureau, and also the addition of three new positions.
<br />He questioned this, and Mr. Michael Carrington, Public Safety Director, stated that the department
<br />was in desperate need of additional personnel and an increased salary for the director because of
<br />the qualifications and responsibilities. He indicated that the department was trying to make that
<br />position more in line with comparable positions. He indicated that, with the three additional
<br />positions, a wage differential would be realized.
<br />Councilman Serge wondered if the $3,000 raise for the greenskeeper would keep the men in South Be
<br />and Mr. Seitz indicated that he could not guarantee that; however, he felt the increases would
<br />definitely help the city keep the professional greenskeepers it presently had. Councilman
<br />
|