My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-28-75 Council Meeting Minutes
sbend
>
Public
>
Common Council
>
Minutes
>
Common Council Meeting Minutes
>
1975
>
07-28-75 Council Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/1/2013 10:05:56 AM
Creation date
7/1/2013 10:00:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council - City Clerk
City Council - Document Type
Council Mtg Minutes
City Counci - Date
7/28/1975
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING (CONTINUED) <br />Section 5 to read: The Common Council recommends that the contribution to dependent <br />hospitalization be increased by $84 per year. <br />Section 4 becomes Section 6. <br />Council President Parent seconded the motion to amend. <br />Councilman Miller then made a motion to amend the amendment as follows: <br />Strike Section 3 and replace with the following: No police officer shall be assigned <br />a service year for 1976 which would result in a lower salary than his base salary as <br />of December 31, 1975, except as may otherwise be ordered by the Board of Safety in <br />case of a reduction in rank. <br />Councilman Horvath seconded the motion to amend the amendment. <br />Council President Parent spoke in opposition to the amendment to the amendment. He felt that each <br />officer should be entitled to the $416 increase in salary, and with Councilman Miller's motion, <br />there was a chance that some of the officers might receive less than the $416 increase. <br />There was a call for the question, and a roll call vote was taken on the amendment to the amend- <br />ment. That motion carried by a vote of six ayes (Councilmen Szymkowiak, Miller, Kopczynski, <br />Horvath, Nemeth and Newburn) and three nays (Councilmen Serge, Taylor and Parent). Councilman <br />Miller then clarified his amendment to include in Section I the addition of $16 for each service <br />year from 1 through 12 for Corporal, Technician Detective, Specialist Det. Serg., Sergeant, <br />Lieutenant and Captain. Councilman Nemeth seconded the motion. The motion carried. There was a <br />call for the question on the entire amendment. Council President Parent requested a roll call <br />vote. The amendment passed by a vote of seven ayes (Councilmen Serge, Szymkowiak, Miller, Taylor, <br />Horvath, Nemeth and Newburn) and two nays (Councilmen Kopczynski and Parent). <br />Police Officer William Coar, representing the Wage Committee of the Fraternal Order of Police, <br />indicated that negotiations had opened with the Council in May, and it was the large feeling of <br />the Police Department that the officers were not receiving a moderate salary if compared to the <br />statistics of the Bureau of Labor. He indicated that the base pay was below the recommended <br />amount. He mentioned the fact that many officers work additional jobs in order to compensate <br />themselves. He stated that the F.O.P. wanted a starting patrolman to receive $5.00 an hour. The <br />F.O.P. asked that there be an adjustment between each rank of $1,000. Officer Coar indicated that <br />approval of this request was not met because of the frozen tax rate. He stated that the F.O.P. <br />understood that problem and had asked that a life insurance and dental insurance plan be picked up, <br />He stated that this had been denied by the Council. The F.O.P. had also requested an increase in <br />the clothing allowance and payment for the off -duty gun which each officer was required to carry. <br />He indicated that approximately 29 officers would be getting less than the $400 increase below the <br />rank of Corporal. He asked that the ordinance be amended again to insure that no officer receive <br />less than a $416 base wage increase. He stated that this was done last year, and he could not <br />understand why it could not be done again. Police Officer Charles Mahank, President of the F.O.P., <br />presented the following hourly rates: <br />Officer in Training <br />$4.10 <br />Compared to: Junior Clerk (clerical) <br />$6.45 <br />Patrolman <br />4.33 <br />Junior Key Punch Operator <br />5.95 <br />Patrolman First Class <br />4.62 <br />Clerk - Typist <br />5.60 <br />Corporal <br />4.96 <br />Drill Press Operator <br />5.46 <br />Technician Detective <br />5.19 <br />Grinder <br />5.62 <br />Lieutenant <br />5.71 <br />Welder (Torrington) <br />5.86 <br />Captain <br />5.83 <br />Painter <br />5.50 <br />Division Chief <br />7.04 <br />Journeyman <br />8.58 <br />Chief <br />7.96 <br />Apprentice <br />6.01 <br />Truck Repairman (A.M. General) <br />6.65 <br />Boiler Repairman <br />6.57 <br />Janitor <br />5.48 <br />Officer Mahank felt these comparisons pointed out the need of the officers within the department. <br />Police Officer Martin Gersey, member of the 1976 F.O.P. Wage Committee, read another comparison <br />of neighboring police rates: <br />Patrolman First Class in South Bend $4.62 <br />Michigan City <br />4.69 <br />Fort Wayne <br />5.19 <br />Hammond <br />5.51 <br />Evansville <br />4.84 <br />Warren, Ohio <br />5.28 <br />Canton, Ohio <br />5.06 <br />Toledo, Ohio <br />5.77 <br />Grand Rapids, Michigan <br />6.69 <br />Springfield, Illinois <br />5.71 <br />Oak Lawn, Illinois <br />7.12 <br />Evanston, Illinois <br />6.95 <br />Police Officer William Humphries, F.O.P. Wage Committee, indicated that a professional police <br />department was requested by the Council, and in return a professional pay was requested by the <br />officers. He indicated that the pay raises were below the average increase. Mr. Gene Evans, <br />Executive Secretary of the Civic Planning Association, read into the record the following statement <br />of the association: <br />Gentlemen: <br />The South Bend Civic Planning Association in reviewing the budgetary needs of the <br />City of South Bend for 1976 realizes the difficulty of meeting rising costs with the <br />limited additional revenue provided by increased property valuation. Approximately <br />$470,000 more revenue will be available in 1976 (assuming a $5.00 civil city tax rate). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.