Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR MEETING JUNE go 1975 <br />COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING (CONTINUED) <br />for a grocery store. He stated that there would be ample parking, and 32 dry wells would service <br />the drainage. A storm sewer was shown in the maps. A combination screen fence and live vegeta- <br />tion would border the west and south sides of the project. He indicated that there was only one <br />remonstrator at the Area Plan Commission hearing, and he was concerned about water runoff onto his <br />property. He felt there would be no problem with drainage because the topography was relatively <br />flat. There were no comments or questions from the audience. <br />Councilman Serge felt there was a drainage problem in the area at the present time. Mr. Carpenter <br />felt that the 32 dry wells, if properly designed, would handle the problem. Councilman Nemeth <br />wondered if Mr. Carpenter considered the proposed rezoning as spot zoning, and Mr. Carpenter <br />indicated that he did not because originally this was designed as a part of the pattern. <br />Councilman Nemeth made a motion that the ordinance be recommended favorably to the Common Council, <br />seconded by Councilman Serge. The motion carried. <br />ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 4990 -68, <br />AS AMENDED, COMMONLY KNOWN AS THE ZONING <br />ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA <br />(1010 Notre Dame Avenue). <br />This being the time heretofore set for public hearing on the above ordinance, proponents and <br />opponents were given an opportunity to be heard. In view of the fact that the petitioners had <br />withdrawn their petition, Councilman Kopczynski made a motion that the ordinance be stricken, <br />seconded by Council President Parent. The motion carried. <br />ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE APPROPRIATING $9,000 FROM THE <br />LOCAL ROAD AND STREET FUND TO PROJECT R & S <br />71 -1975, LOGAN STREET FROM GRAND TRUNK AND <br />WESTERN RAILROAD TRACKS NORTH TO BULLA STREET. <br />This being the time heretofore set for public hearing on the above ordinance, proponents and <br />opponents were given an opportunity to be heard. Mr. Rollin Farrand, Director of the Department o <br />Public Works, made the presentation for the ordinance. He indicated that the next five items on t <br />agenda, including the appropriation for $9,000 for Project R & S 71 -1975, dealt with street pro- <br />grams for the current year. He explained that, with the current availability of Federal -Aid Urban <br />Funds and the probability that these or similar funds would continue to be available, it was <br />necessary that efforts be made to provide increased design time for proposed construction projects <br />He stated that three to five years must be allowed for the design stage in order to provide <br />adequate time to process environmental impact data, conduct public hearings and conduct design <br />in a more rigid pattern. The present Federal -Aid Funds were available on a 70 % -30% matching basis <br />which would allow the city to buy $10 worth of improvements for $3. He stated that five projects <br />were being proposed. Three of these were specifically being developed for conformance with federa <br />guidelines. A fourth, the Ironwood Road Project, would be combined with other Ironwood Road pro- <br />jects at a later date and considered on a route basis for federal review procedures. The fifth <br />project was a sewer project for an unserved portion of South Miami Street and would be conducted <br />as a Barrett Law project. He explained that staff considerations in the Department of Public <br />Works would not enable the department to perform the design tasks. He indicated that only <br />partial funding was being requested for the Miami Street project, and additional funds to complete <br />the design would be requested at a later date. He stated that the funds not included in the Logan <br />Street project reflected anticipated participation by the City of Mishawaka, and the 30% would be <br />split with Mishawaka. <br />Councilman Miller wondered if the engineering firms had been determined for each contract, and Mr. <br />Farrand indicated that Cole and Associates would be contracted to perform the work on the Logan <br />Street Project and the Ironwood Project; Murphy Consultants would be contracted for the Chapin <br />Street Project; Clyde E. Williams for the Miami Road Project; and Kent Kaser and Associates for the <br />Miami Sanitary Sewer Project. Councilman Miller wondered about the basis for the estimated costs, <br />and Mr. Farrand indicated that these were lump sum fees based on the estimated costs of the fee <br />curve. Councilman Miller wondered if the projects were broken down as far as amount of work com- <br />pleted, etc. Mr. Farrand indicated that the consultant could receive intermediate payments because <br />of the various stages. He stated that the projects would be "start to finish" and federal approval) <br />would have to be had after completion of each stage. He indicated that the city would participate' <br />in these decisions. He stated that the city was not proposing complete funding for the Miami Stree' <br />Project and the consultant would not be authorized to proceed beyond that funding. Councilman <br />Miller wondered if the contracts would be let within 60 days, and Mr. Farrand indicated that the <br />design contracts would be let within 60 days subject to Council approval. Councilman Miller <br />wondered about the completion dates, and Mr. Farrand indicated that the Ironwood Project would be <br />completed in 90 days and also the Miami Sewer Project. He stated that the other projects could <br />take up to two years. He talked about the projects currently underway by the city. Councilman <br />Kopczynski wondered why he had not been receiving a progress report on the various street projects. <br />He felt the councilmen should be given progress reports. He felt a timetable should be set up as <br />well as the method of financing and the availability of funds. He asked for a total of all <br />projects "in the works" at the present time. Mr. Farrand apologized if some of the reports had not <br />been distributed. He stated that, at the last caucus meeting, he had submitted a lengthly report <br />(concerning the financing, etc. Councilman Nemeth asked that Councilman Kopczynski be furnished a <br />copy of that report as he had not been present at the caucus meeting. Mr. Farrand indicated that <br />he would do that. Councilman Taylor wondered if the necessary right -of -way on Miami Street had <br />been obtained for the project. Mr. Farrand indicated that, wherever there was 40 feet, there was <br />sufficient right -of -way; however, he felt some right -of -way would have to be acquired. Council <br />President Parent stated that all the projects had been discussed at a recent caucus meeting. He <br />felt there was no major objection on the part of the Council to the proposed projects. He made <br />a motion that the ordinance be recommended favorably to the Common Council, seconded by Councilman <br />Horvath. The motion carried. <br />ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE TO APPROPRIATE $18,000 FROM THE <br />LOCAL ROAD AND STREET FUND, AND $2,000 FROM <br />THE CUMULATIVE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND TO <br />PROJECT R & S 68, RECONSTRUCTION OF IRONWOOD <br />ROAD FROM EDISON ROAD TO SOUTH BEND AVENUE (SR 23). <br />This being the time heretofore set for public hearing on the above ordinance, proponents and <br />