Laserfiche WebLink
2 <br />REGULAR MEETING APRIL 7, 1975 <br />COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING (CONTINUED) <br />hoped the proposal as filed would not be amended to change membership in the merit board. He <br />indicated that 14 months had been spent preparing the merit plan and many proposals were <br />incorporated into the plan. He felt any changes at this time might bring out a negative vote <br />from the members on the force. Councilman Horvath called for the question on the amendment, and <br />Council President Parent seconded the motion to close debate. The motion carried with Councilmen <br />Szymkowiak and Kopczynski opposing. Chairman Newburn requested a roll call vote on the motion to <br />amend the composition of the merit board. The motion lost by a roll call vote of two in favor <br />(Councilmen Szymkowiak and Kopczynski) and six against (Councilmen Serge, Miller, Taylor, Horvath, <br />Newburn and Parent) with Councilman Nemeth absent. <br />Council President Parent felt the ordinances contained a great deal of compromise and the proposa <br />were acceptable to most all concerned. He made a motion that the ordinances be recommended <br />favorably to the Common Council, seconded by Councilman Serge. Councilman Miller felt the merit <br />plan was an important step taken on the part of the Council in that it took hold of the issue and <br />was showing that it was trying to be independent and progressive. He complimented Councilman <br />Taylor and all those involved in the proposals. Chairman Newburn requested a roll call vote on <br />the motion to recommend the ordinances favorably to the Council. The motion carried by a roll <br />call vote of eight ayes (Councilmen Serge, Szymkowiak, Miller, Taylor, Kopczynski, Horvath, <br />Newburn and Parent) with Councilman Nemeth absent. <br />ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND SUPPLEMENTING <br />CHAPTER 40 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF SOUTH <br />BEND, INDIANA (property located south of <br />Dunham Street and north of the New Jersey, <br />Indiana and Illinois Railroad tracks). <br />This being the time heretofore set for public hearing on the above ordinance, proponents and <br />opponents were given an opportunity to be heard. Councilman Kopczynski made the presentation for <br />the ordinance. He indicated that he had initiated the rezoning for the property between Dunham <br />and the railroad tracks. He referred to an overlay of the property, pointing out that there was <br />residential property in the vicinity. He felt the neighborhood could be saved if the rezoning wa <br />changed to light industrial. <br />Mr. Jack Klein, 123 River Avenue, Mishawaka, wondered about any problems that might be caused by <br />the rezoning, and Councilman Kopczynski indicated that there would be no major problems as there <br />was no heavy industrial facilities in the area at this time. Councilman Horvath wondered if the <br />recycling operation was still in existence in the area, and Councilman Kopczynski indicated that <br />the business was not in operation because the proper permission had not been given. Councilman <br />Horvath wondered about the operation of a junk yard in the area, and Councilman Kopczynski stated <br />that, at one time, there was such a business; however, it had not been in operation for quite som <br />time. He stated that there were problems with the junk yard concerning the old cars and numerous <br />rats. Council President Parent indicated that the main intent of the ordinance was to prohibit <br />the operation of a junk yard in the area because of the residential properties in the area. <br />Councilman Serge made a motion that the ordinance be recommended favorably to the Common Council, <br />seconded by Councilman Szymkowiak. The motion carried. <br />ORDINANCE <br />AN ORDINANCE ANNEXING TO AND BRINGING <br />WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS OF SOUTH BEND, <br />INDIANA, CERTAIN LANDS (Place and Company). <br />This being the time heretofore set for public hearing on the above ordinance, proponents and <br />opponents were given an opportunity to be heard. Mr. Joseph Roper, 414 North Taylor, the attorne <br />representing Place and Company, made the presentation for the ordinance. He explained that his <br />client was requesting the Council to annex approximately seven acres of land to the south of the <br />city off Kern Road. He referred to a sketch outlining the property proposed to be annexed. He <br />stated that the land was unplatted and unimproved at this time, and homes would be constructed on <br />the property and the land would be more sellable if brought into the city. There were no comment <br />or questions. <br />Councilman Taylor made a motion that the ordinance be recommended favorably to the Common Council, <br />seconded by Councilman Kopczynski. The motion carried. <br />ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND SUPPLEMENTING <br />ORDINANCE NO. 4990 -68, CHAPTER 40 OF THE <br />MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND, <br />INDIANA, FORMERLY REFERRED TO AS ZONING <br />ORDINANCE NO. 3702, AS AMENDED (3500 and <br />3600 blocks of East Jefferson). <br />This being the time heretofore set for public hearing on the above ordinances, proponents and <br />opponents were given an opportunity to be heard. Mr. James Groves, Attorney at Law practicing at <br />2210 American National Bank Building, made the presentation for the ordinance. He explained that <br />he was representing the petitioner in the rezoning, being the Whitmore Corporation. He requested <br />that an amendment be made to the ordinance and petition to change the request for zoning from "C" <br />Commercial to "B" Residential. He indicated that professional offices would be utilized and this <br />could be accomplished in the "B" Residential classification. He stated that a portion of Sunnyme <br />had been vacated because it would fall within the general plan of the proposed offices. He refer <br />to an overlay of the property. On February 21st, a meeting was held with the local residents, <br />and approximately 20 residents attended and appeared to have no objection to the rezoning. The <br />project would consist of professional offices. He stated that presently the property was being p <br />to no specific use. He presented photographs to the Council members, and he talked about the oth <br />businesses and professional offices located on East Jefferson Boulevard. <br />Mrs. Irene K. Gammon, City Clerk, wondered about the southeast corner of Jefferson and 35th Stree <br />She also wondered what would be done about the lot on East Jefferson which was included in the <br />rezoning. Mr. Groves stated that it was his understanding that nothing west of 35th Street would <br />be rezoned. He stated that the meeting with the area residents was held because of the proposal <br />to rezone those parcels, and that all lots would be used for professional offices. He stated tha <br />e <br />