REGULAR MEETING FEBRUARY 10, 1975
<br />REGULAR MEETING - RECONVENED (CONTINUED)
<br />the city could "go alone" on the project, and Mr. Byers indicated that, as MACOG interpreted the
<br />guidelines, the program was areawide. Councilman Taylor indicated that he would support the
<br />resolution; however, he was bothered about funds coming from Washington, D.C., and he felt this
<br />should be done in a flexible way. He felt that, in the past, block grants have lacked flexibility
<br />Mr. Byers indicated that he agreed with Councilman Taylor's remark.
<br />Councilman Miller made a motion to reluctantly adopt the resolution, seconded by Councilman Taylor
<br />The resolution was adopted by a roll call vote of six ayes (Councilmen Serge, Miller, Taylor,
<br />Nemeth, Newburn and Parent), one nay (Councilman Szymkowiak) and one abstention (Councilman
<br />Kopczynski). Councilman Horvath was absent. Councilmen Szymkowiak and Kopczynski were of the
<br />opinion that additional information was needed concerning the matter.
<br />RESOLUTION
<br />A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMON COUNCIL OF
<br />THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA,
<br />ESTABLISHING THE AUTHORITY OF THE
<br />MAYOR TO DESIGNATE INDIVIDUALS
<br />AUTHORIZED TO DRAW ON A LETTER OF
<br />CREDIT EXECUTED FOR GRANTS UNDER
<br />TITLE I OF THE HOUSING AND COMMUNITY
<br />DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 1974.
<br />A public hearing was held on the resolution at this time. Mr. Walter Lantz, Chief Deputy Controlli
<br />explained that the resolution would meet the terms of the Community Development Act in providing
<br />the means of the receipt of money distributed to the city. This requirements was not needed in th,
<br />past; however, now two individuals must sign in order to draw on a letter of credit, and the
<br />resolution was required. He stated that this would apply to any funds received under the Communit:
<br />Development Act. Councilman Miller asked for an explanation regarding the letter of credit. Mr.
<br />Lantz indicated that a bank must be designated as a depository for the city. A letter of credit
<br />was used rather than a check. When this was sent to the bank, the city would sign as a receiver
<br />and could then draw on that amount. Councilman Miller asked about the regulations required for
<br />drawing out of the account. Mr. Lantz indicated that this would be the same procedure as a checki:
<br />account. He stated that the resolution, however, did not deal with the disbursement of the funds.
<br />Councilman Serge asked about the signatories, and Mr. Lantz indicated that Mr. Barcome, himself or
<br />Mr. Hojnacki could be designated. He stated that all expenditures would be handled through the
<br />normal process of approving claims. Councilman Nemeth asked about the normal claim procedure. Mr
<br />Lantz indicated that the claims are docketed by the City Clerk and then signed and approved by
<br />the Board of Public Works. He stated that the Council also reviews the claims and the State Board
<br />of Accounts audits. Councilman Nemeth stated that, in effect, the administration would not be
<br />coming back to the Council for expenditures of the money. He wondered which bank was to be
<br />designated, and Mr. Lantz indicated that the American National Bank would probably be the
<br />depository; however, if a large amount of money was given, it could be distributed among the banks
<br />Councilman Nemeth wondered who designated the banks, and Mr. Lantz indicated that the Mayor did.
<br />Councilman Nemeth wondered about a budget for the program and the appropriations. He wondered if
<br />a resolution could be adopted for expending the funds. Mr. Lantz indicated that he was not talkin,
<br />about spending the funds, merely receipt of the funds. Councilman Nemeth stated that he wanted to
<br />know about the procedure for expenditure. Council President Parent asked that Mr. Lantz outline
<br />for the Council in writing the procedure utilized so that it could be made aware of the situation.
<br />Councilman Nemeth made a motion to refer the resolution to the Human Resources Committee until the
<br />information requested was received, seconded by Councilman Kopczynski. Mr. William Hojnacki,
<br />Director of the Department of Human Resources and Economic Development, indicated that he would
<br />provide a circular to the Council explaining the procedure. Councilman Miller wondered if the
<br />Council had adopted a similar resolution concerning the Manpower Program. Mr. Lantz indicated tha-
<br />a resolution of this sort had never been required in the past and two signatures also were not
<br />required before. He explained that the Manpower funds were received by check and a fund was
<br />established, with a fund number being assigned. Councilman Miller indicated that the Council was
<br />concerned about maintaining its integrity on the supervision of the funds of the city. He stated
<br />that, in the manpower area, this was done outside the Council's jurisdiction. He did not want the
<br />Community Development funds to escape the Council's jurisdiction. Council President Parent felt
<br />the matter was clear in that the resolution dealt with the receipt of money - -not the expenditure
<br />of it:. He wondered if there was a problem in delaying the issue temporarily. Mr. Hojnacki
<br />indicated that the city was anticipating advance funding within the next two weeks and it could
<br />not be received until the resolution was passed. He indicated that a one -year plan would be
<br />approved by the Council on the expenditure of funds for the program before it was submitted to the
<br />federal government. Council President Parent asked that the public hearing be continued to
<br />February 24 rather than just referring the issue to committee. Councilman Nemeth indicated that
<br />he would withdraw his original motion. He then made a motion to continue the public hearing on
<br />the resolution to the February 24th meeting of the Council and also refer the matter to the Human
<br />Resources Committee. Councilman Kopczynski seconded the motion. The motion carried.
<br />RESOLUTION NO. 473 -75
<br />A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMON COUNCIL OF
<br />THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA,
<br />APPROVING THE AWARDING OF THIRTEEN
<br />CONTRACTS IN EXCESS OF $5,000 FOR
<br />REHABILITATION WORK IN THE SOUTHEAST
<br />NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM.
<br />WHEREAS, under provisions of Ordinance No. 5689 -74, passed by the South Bend
<br />Common Council on June 24, 1974, all contracts in the Neighborhood Development Program
<br />in excess of $5,000 must be approved by the Common Council; and
<br />WHEREAS, low bids for thirteen properties to be rehabilitated under the
<br />Neighborhood Development Program have exceeded $5,000.
<br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Common Council of the City of South Bend,
<br />Indiana:
<br />1. That approval be granted to the Redevelopment Commission of the City of South
<br />Bend, Indiana, to enter into a contract with Area Services, Inc. for the rehabilitation
<br />of the following properties:
<br />
|