REGULAR MEETING AUGUST 12, 1974
<br />REGULAR MEETING - RECONVENED (CONTINUED)
<br />RESOLUTION NO. 441 -74 (CONTINUED)
<br />WHEREAS, allegations of misconduct charges within the South Bend Police Department
<br />have been made by a group ot'officers; and
<br />WHEREAS, the allegations have been made to overlook enforcement of laws in certain
<br />areas of the city; and
<br />WHEREAS, the public in general, from time to time, has made complaints about the
<br />manner in which the Police Department responds to citizens' calls for police service.
<br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Common Council of the City of South Bend,
<br />Indiana:
<br />SECTION 1. That a public investigation be made of the South Bend Police Department
<br />by the Common Council and any other personnel deemed necessary for a thorough investigation
<br />of the above allegations and other matters to insure that the Police Department will serve
<br />the citizens in an impartial, efficient and courteous manner.
<br />SECTION 2. This Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its
<br />passage by the Common Council and approval by the Mayor.
<br />s/ Walter T. Kopczynski
<br />Member of the Common Council
<br />A public hearing was held on the resolution at this time. Councilman Kopczynski indicated that he
<br />felt the citizens had a right to know what was going on in the Police Department. He felt this
<br />investigation should be made public and the administration should not make the investigation of
<br />one of its own departments. He also felt that the Council should investigate the department
<br />because it was a duty entrusted to it by state law. He talked about the various complaints
<br />received in the past on the kind of police service the citizens were receiving. He felt the
<br />department operated under "a veil of secrecy ", and he wanted a public investigation to make the
<br />facts known to the citizens. He stated that it was the Council's duty to investigate the Police
<br />Department and restore the confidence the people should have in that department. He urged the
<br />Council to adopt the resolution and take the necessary steps to correct the problems within the
<br />Police Department.
<br />Mr. Maurice Cohen, 725 East Eckman Street, felt the Council should conduct an investigation. He
<br />felt it would not be feasible to have the Crime Commission conduct the investigation, and he also
<br />urged passage of the resolution. Mr. James Russell, 1517 North Fremont, again brought up the subji
<br />of police brutality. Council President Nemeth stated that the resolution re- states the responsibi:
<br />given the Council by law; however, the Crime Commission had been created in order to make recommen•
<br />dations concerning the department. He felt that the Crime Commission should go first and make its
<br />recommendations, if necessary. Then the Council could go ahead and make its recommendations. He
<br />urged that the Mayor propose a request for revenue sharing funds for the Crime Commission in order
<br />to get the commission off the ground. He felt the Council would not "shirk its responsibility ".
<br />Miss Virginia Guthrie, Consultant and member of the Board of Directors of the Civic Planning
<br />Association, stated that a series of meetings have been held and a report would be made shortly
<br />concerning the commission's findings and recommendations. She indicated that the commission was
<br />waiting for word on whether or not the state police would enter the picture. Mr. James Barcome,
<br />City Controller, indicated that an ordinance proposing $7,500 for the Crime Commission would be
<br />forthcoming at the next Council meeting: Mrs. Janet Allen, 125 West Marion Street, disagreed with
<br />the use of revenue sharing funds for the Crime Commission. She stated that she endorsed the con -
<br />cept of the proposed resolution. Councilman Taylor indicated that the original concept of the
<br />Crime Commission had been his idea and Council President Nemeth had written the ordinance. He
<br />talked about the lack of trust between the citizens and the city officials. He stated that he did
<br />not approve of all the "pre- judgment" that was being made. He stated that the Council placed no
<br />restrictions on the Crime Commission and had no control over the commission. He stated that the
<br />Mayor had no power over the commission either. He felt the commission was a citizens' commission
<br />as it was intended to be, and he stated that he agreed with the statements made by Council Presides
<br />Nemeth concerning the proposed resolution. Councilman Parent stated that, on one hand, people fee:
<br />the Council should look into the matter, and on the other hand, the Crime Commission would not be
<br />objective in making recommendations. He felt there was no logic in that. He felt the Crime
<br />Commission and the state police and prosecutor would be able to accomplish the job. If not, the
<br />Council could step in and take over., Councilman Szymkowiak felt that the money should be appro-
<br />priated for the Crime Commission in order that it could start the investigation. He agreed with
<br />the proposed resolution; however, he felt the Crime Commission should conduct the investigation.
<br />He felt the proposed resolution could be used "as the arm needed." to complete the investigation,
<br />if necessary. For that reason, Councilman Szymkowiak indicated that he would vote in favor of the
<br />resolution. Mr. Kenneth Fedder, Deputy County Prosecutor, spoke on behalf of the prosecutor's
<br />staff. He stated that he had caused a telegram to be sent to Governor Bowen to have the state
<br />police conduct the investigation. He stated that eventually the personnel assigned to the inves-
<br />tigation would come from other parts of Indiana, and the investigation would not be conducted by
<br />the prosecutor's office. He stated that a meeting would be held and it would be requested that the
<br />state police and the Crime Commission would investigate the issue. Councilman Kopczynski stated
<br />that, when the investigation was complete, the Council should thoroughly study the recommendations.
<br />Councilman Kopczynski made a motion that the resolution be adopted, seconded by Councilman Szymkow:
<br />Mr. Russell wondered about a public hearing so that the citizens would be aware of the issue. Mr.
<br />Fedder stated that this would have to be determined by the state police and the Crime Commission.
<br />He stated that the investigation was being culminated. There was a call for the question. The
<br />resolution was adopted by a roll call vote of nine ayes (Councilmen Serge, Szymkowiak, Miller,
<br />Parent, Taylor, Kopczynski, Horvath, Newburn and Nemeth).
<br />Councilman Taylor made a motion to recess, seconded by Councilman Szymkowiak. The motion carried,
<br />and the Council recessed at 12:15 p.m. Reconvened at 12:25 p.m.
<br />ORDINANCES, FIRST READING
<br />ct
<br />ity
<br />it
<br />Gak.
<br />
|