r,_ a_ ,
<br />0
<br />REGULAR MEETING JULY 25, 1983
<br />BILL NO. 72 -83 A BILL APPROVING THE FORM AND TERMS OF THE LOAN AGREEMENT,
<br />INDENTURE OF TRUST, AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT REVENUE BONDS,
<br />AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION THEREOF, AND APPROVING THE
<br />RESOLUTION OF THE SOUTH BEND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
<br />RELATING TO THE PARK CENTER ASSOCIATES PROJECT.
<br />This being the time heretofore set for public hearing on the above bill, proponents
<br />and opponents were given an opportunity to be heard. Kevin Butler, attorney representing
<br />Park Center Associates, made the presentation for the bill. He indicated the facility
<br />would be located in the Monroe Park Urban Renewal Area at Marietta and Sample. He
<br />indicated the project would cost $820,000 and they were asking for a $650,000 bond
<br />issue. He indicated they would hire approximately 22 new employees. Council Member
<br />Szymkowiak made a motion to recommend this bill to the Council favorable, seconded by
<br />Council Member Harris. The motion carried.
<br />Council Member McGann indicated that due to the fact that the Council had prior documenta
<br />on Bill No. 71 -83 he felt there should be public hearing and second reading on the
<br />bill at this meeting. He made a motion to reconsider Bill No. 71 -83 for public hearing
<br />and second reading, seconded by Council Member Serge. The motion carried. Kenneth
<br />Feddef,- attorney for the Economic Development Commission, described the changes made
<br />in th.e- ,substitute bill on file with the City Clerk. He indicated the bond issue was
<br />for St. Paul's Retirement Center, in order to refinance the construction indebtedness
<br />to fund a debt service reserve fund to pay certain principal and interest on the
<br />original bonds. He indicated the original bonds were in default and in order to
<br />alleviate the financial deficiencies it was necessary to refinance. Kevin Butler,
<br />attorney representing Brethren Care, spoke in favor of this bill. Council Member
<br />McGann made a motion to recommend this bill to the Council favorable, as amended,
<br />seconded by Council Member Taylor. The motion carried.
<br />BILL NO. 70 -83
<br />A BILL OF THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND,
<br />INDIANA, AMENDING CHAPTER 2, ARTICLE 6 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE
<br />OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA, ENTITLED TAX ABATEMENT
<br />PROCEDURES.
<br />This being the time heretofore set for public hearing on the above bill, proponents
<br />and opponents were given an opportunity to be heard. Council Member Taylor made the
<br />presentation for the bill. He indicated a substitute bill had been filed with the
<br />City Clerk. Council Member Beck made a motion to accept the substitute bill, seconded
<br />by Council Member Harris. The motion carried. Council Member Taylor indicated that
<br />due to a change in State law, the Council was mandated to change our tax abatement
<br />procedure. He indicated that through a series of Committee meetings the original
<br />bill has been streamlined; such as, eliminating Area Plan and the Redevelopment Commissi
<br />however, the Redevlopment staff has been retained to handle the process. Council
<br />Member Voorde indicated that the bill should be amended on page 4, paragraph (g) in
<br />order to grandfather personal property abatements. Kathy Cekanski- Farrand, Council
<br />attorney, indicated after the word "expire" the following should be added: "so that
<br />new improvements in the urban economic revitalization area are eligible for tax abatment
<br />only if said new improvements are substantially completed and certified within a
<br />three - -(3) year period commencing with the effective date of the declaratory resolution."
<br />Council Member Voorde made a motion to amend the bill, seconded by Council Member
<br />Beck. The motion carried. Council Member Voorde indicated he would like to further
<br />amend the bill. He made a motion to continue this bill until August 8, seconded by
<br />Council Member Harris. The motion failed. - Council Member Taylor made a motion to
<br />recommend this bill to the Council favorable, seconded by Council Member Beck. The
<br />motion carried.
<br />Council Member Beck made a motion to recess, seconded by Council Member McGann. The
<br />motion carried and the meeting was recessed at 8 :02 p.m., and reconvened at 8:30 p.m.
<br />BILL NO. 73 -83 A BILL FIXING MAXIMUM SALARIES AND WAGES OF APPOINTED OFFICERS
<br />AND EMPLOYEES OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA, FOR THE
<br />YEAR 1984.
<br />This being the time heretofore set for public hearing on the above bill, proponents
<br />and opponents were given an opportunity to be heard. Joseph Kernan, City Controller,
<br />made the presentation for the bill. He indicated that 1984 salaries for union employees
<br />were established last year. He indicated that non -union employees were proposed at a
<br />4% increase over the 1983 level. He indicated the positions of City Attorney, City
<br />Engineer, Superintendent of Parks, Redevelopment Director and City Controller will
<br />receive no increase. He indicated that several other positions are proposed to have
<br />additional adjustments for 1984 in order to correct disparities, these positions
<br />include: chief inspector and inspection II in Neighborhood Code Enforcement; director
<br />of museums, senior curator, theatre director, assistant City attorney; personnel
<br />coordinator; front -line supervisors of union personnel, manager of the Bureau of
<br />Waste - Water, Manager of the Bureau of Sanitation and several positions in Community
<br />Devlopment. He indicated that because Community Development is on the same fiscal
<br />year their salary ordinance has been incorporated into this bill. He indicated that
<br />total salaries are now shown for each position eliminating the confusion of footnotes
<br />on multi- funded positions. Joseph Simeri, attorney for the School Crossing Guards,
<br />indicated this bill was going to provide a four percent increase for all non -union
<br />employees. He indicated the grossing guards were not getting the four percent increase.
<br />He indicated the Crossing
<br />Guards had enter into an agreement with the City two years ago, and the City was not
<br />honoring this contract. He asked the Council to vote no on this bill. Terry Miller,
<br />.on
<br />1
<br />1
<br />I
<br />�J
<br />
|