My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
626 Portage Avenue_COA 2025-1230
sbend
>
Public
>
Historic Preservation
>
2026
>
January
>
Commission Approved Projects
>
626 Portage Avenue_COA 2025-1230
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2026 10:23:26 AM
Creation date
1/21/2026 10:23:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
South Bend HPC
HPC Street Address
626 Portage Avenue
HPC Document Type
Certification
HPC Local Historic District
ix. Chapin Park
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY <br />Phone: 574/235.9371 Fax: 574/235.9021 Email: hpcsbsjc@southbendin.gov <br />STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The existing storefront is not original to the building, though it was with his- <br />toric sensitivity in mind. Both proposed designs meet the Standards and Guidelines’ recommendations for replac- <br />ing an existing non-historic storefront, which recommend the use of traditional design elements and a high degree <br />of transparency (p. 58). The National Park Service’s Preservation Brief on historic storefronts further advises that <br />replacement storefronts should respect historic scale and proportion, maintain the traditional storefront design <br />framework, and maximize transparency (p. 8). While the proposed designs may result in a slight reduction in trans- <br />parency compared to the existing storefront, Staff have worked with the property owners to develop an appropriate <br />and sympathetic solution that best balances the requirements of the building’s historic designation and current use. <br />Furthermore, the differences between Design 1 and Design 2 do not meaningfully affect either design’s adherence <br />to the Standards and Guidelines or to national preservation guidance; rather, the distinction falls within the realm <br />of design preference. As such, the Commission should refrain from “designing the project” for the applicant by <br />approving only one design of the two. Instead issue a blanket approval or denial for both designs. Based on the <br />information provided prior to this public hearing, Staff make a FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION for <br />both designs, with the final design to be chosen by the owner and communicated to Staff in the event of <br />Commission approval. <br />Prepared by <br />Kate Himick, Historic Preservation Specialist
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.