My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1. 626 Portage Avenue_COA 2025-1230 PACKET
sbend
>
Public
>
Historic Preservation
>
2026
>
January
>
1. 626 Portage Avenue_COA 2025-1230 PACKET
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/13/2026 4:00:14 PM
Creation date
1/13/2026 3:58:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
South Bend HPC
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY <br />Phone: 574/235.9371 Fax: 574/235.9021 Email: hpcsbsjc@southbendin.gov <br />STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The existing storefront is not original to the building, though it was with his- <br />toric sensitivity in mind. Both proposed designs meet the Standards and Guidelines’ recommendations for replac- <br />ing an existing non-historic storefront, which recommend the use of traditional design elements and a high degree <br />of transparency (p. 58). The National Park Service’s Preservation Brief on historic storefronts further advises that <br />replacement storefronts should respect historic scale and proportion, maintain the traditional storefront design <br />framework, and maximize transparency (p. 8). While the proposed designs may result in a slight reduction in trans- <br />parency compared to the existing storefront, Staff have worked with the property owners to develop an appropriate <br />and sympathetic solution that best balances the requirements of the building’s historic designation and current use. <br />Furthermore, the differences between Design 1 and Design 2 do not meaningfully affect either design’s adherence <br />to the Standards and Guidelines or to national preservation guidance; rather, the distinction falls within the realm <br />of design preference. As such, the Commission should refrain from “designing the project” for the applicant by <br />approving only one design of the two. Instead issue a blanket approval or denial for both designs. Based on the <br />information provided prior to this public hearing, Staff make a FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION for <br />both designs, with the final design to be chosen by the owner and communicated to Staff in the event of <br />Commission approval. <br />Prepared by <br />Kate Himick, Historic Preservation Specialist
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.