Laserfiche WebLink
petitioner further sheweth that part of Section I"10e 11, Township <br />No. 2 East, mentioned in above schedule, is a large <br />I`o. 37, Range <br />tract of lancl containing upwards of 600 acres and part of which lies <br />immediately adjoining to and includes a portion of the town plat of <br />South Bend, and other portions of �rhich lie at a distance of one mile <br />V <br />thereabouts from said town. That a part of said Section No. 11 s <br />,r <br />or <br />state, and other p onions are in a highly cultivated <br />' <br />in a uncultivated <br />and valuable improvements thereon. That aisfere7at <br />kJ <br />state, and have large <br />in their respective value, <br />much <br />portions oesaid Section No. 11 vary m <br />appraisers without distinguishing the difference in value of <br />yet said <br />different portions of said section, appraised the same at the <br />the <br />of �30,004; that said appraisement had been delivered to <br />ai <br />gross sum <br />for returning same had expired. Then petition-- <br />Commissioner before time <br />er applied to saicl Lot Day and John Newell and requested them to aplg' wise <br />F <br />to distinguish between the relative value <br />' <br />Section 11 in such manner as <br />r <br />' <br />different portions of said Section, but they utterly refused <br />�. <br />of the <br />that said appraisement is grossly exorbitant, ancl said apprais- <br />4ft . <br />so to do; <br />-not governed by its Present value, but by its prospective value• <br />ers were <br />That said appraisers werltguilty of gross fraud and partiality. '.dherefOre <br />.c <br />that said appraisement bdset aside. (petition duly <br />ti <br />petitioner prays <br />verified by the affidavit of petitioner.) <br />On September 29th, 1843, cause continued. <br />On April 4th, 1844, cause continued; and onthe second day of <br />oa�7' :. <br />y;!t,r�#f,., y year and complainant proves to the <br />,�`D,"� �OA°�IX`�� �� v� September Term, 1844, parties aP1 <br />a <br />satisfaction of the Court that a over of Attorney %i dul executed b� <br />Alexis Cogajllard and John D. Defrees and that they are still livillg; <br />by �rh3ch 1'o�vcx o-E At-tornc�y sa3.dL t=3ogLL:La_1fa.rd and De-OrOEs, 4exig=eOct tkaa't e <br />cic3 eroo be oat t�roa a�r�.iran't= i�heym SOT 't ]2� sz�r�t off' �jP38 91.4� A�xd n.o "t rrlL T .�.nei "tl'Z 't <br />Lc,crc�c.roracl.or�c1 1'�43rch Torm, 1t33 aha1Z 'tea gus-L-�.�.nod and not vscs.'L6ct .end <br />ararv�l�oc�, :�xxc� 'vn�'L Lh� aes.id aPi�rai ae mc, r�L- ms�c3o by 'thQ sa 3. c1 Low Dny and <br />�oY�iz '�?¢+tivo"17_ 3]na17_ bc- Nc L- r��iAo ua-id GYz.a C S2/3 or -61710 -EEL 1r zrL-1-7- <br />-Dr oYi or-C.y tlo ncr 3ba8 I-W, ESa:td :. el :11;38 0 91-1 , Sand no-L' more; and <br />