|
someone who has transferred to a position involving the performance of covered functions)? §199.209(b)(1), Does the operator have
<br />a process to ensure it treats all covered employees the same with regards to pre -employment alcohol testing (Lemust not test some
<br />covered employees and not others)? §199.209(b)(2), Does the operator have a process to ensure it conducts the pre -employment
<br />test only after making a contingent offer of employment or transfer, subject to the employee passing the pre -employment alcohol test?
<br />§199.209(b)(3)
<br />Plan: VI. Alcohol Misuse Prevention Program— 1. DOT -Required Alcoho/ Tests, Pre-Erttploymenf Testing
<br />Does operator
<br />h Alcohol cess to
<br />Does the operator have a process to ensure it completes a DOT post -accident alcohol testes soon as practicable Following an accident
<br />of each surviving covered employee whose performance of a covered function either contributed to the accident or cannot be
<br />completely discounted as a contributing factor to the accident? §199.225(a)(1), If the operator did not administer a DOT alcohol test
<br />within 2 hours following an accident, does the operator have a process to ensure it prepares and maintains on file a record stating the
<br />reasons the lest was not promptly administered? §199.225(a)(2)(i), If the operator does not administer a DOT alcohol lest within 8
<br />hours following an accident, does the operator have a process to ensure It ceases attempts to administer the lest and prepares and
<br />malntains on file a record stating the reasons the lest was not administered? §199.225(a)(2)(1), If the operator decides not to conduct
<br />a post -accident alcohol test of a covered employee, does the operator have a process to ensure It makes that decision based on
<br />specific Information that the covered employee's performance had no role in the cause(s) or severity of the accident? §199.225(a)(1),
<br />If the operator decided not to conduct a post.accident alcohol lest of a covered employees, does the operator have a process to
<br />ensure it documents the decision and keeps that record for at least 3 years? §199.227(b)(4) -
<br />Plan: V1, Alcohol Mlsuse Prevention Program— 9. DOT -Required Alcohol Tests, Past -Accident Testing, VII. Program Elements
<br />Common to Drug and Alcohol — G. Recorchooping, Records and Retention Periods, XIIL Appendix F — Post -Accident or
<br />Reasonable Cause/Suspicion Supervisor Written Record
<br />C 9c' Reasonable Suspicion Alcohol Testing - ',
<br />Does the operator have a process to ensure that DO7 alcohol tests are performed when there is reasonable suspicion to believe the
<br />employee has violated the alcohol use prohibitions In Part 199, Subpart C? §199.225(b), Does the operator have a process to ensure
<br />the operator's determination that reasonable suspicion exists Is based on specific, contemporaneous, articulable observations
<br />concerning the appearance, behavior, speech, or body odors of the employee and that the observations must be made during, lust
<br />preceding, or just after the period of the work day the employee isrequiredto be in compliance with Part 199, Subpart C?
<br />§199.225(b)(2)&(3), Does the operator have a process to ensure that a covered employee Is directed by the operator to undergo
<br />reasonable suspicion testing for alcohol only while the employee is performing covered functions; Just before the employee Is to
<br />perform covered functions; orjust after the employee has ceased performing covered functions? §199.225(b)(3), If the operator does
<br />not administer a DOT alcohol teslwlthin 2 hours following the determination of reasonable suspicion, does the operator have a process
<br />to ensure that It prepares and maintains on file a record staling the reason the lest was not promptly administered? §199.225(b)(4)(i),
<br />If the operator does not administer a DOT alcohol lest within 8.hours following the determination of reasonable suspicion, does the
<br />operator have a process to ensure that it ceases attempts toadminister the test and prepares and maintains on file a record stating
<br />the reasons the test was not administered? §199.225(b)(4)(1), Regardless of whether or not a reasonable suspicion alcohol test is
<br />conducted, verify the operator does not permit a covered employee to report for duly or remain on duty performing covered functions
<br />while the employee is under the influence of, or impaired by alcohol, as shown by the behavioral, speech, or performance indicators
<br />of alcohol misuse, §199.226(b)(4)(01), Regardless of whether or not a reasonable suspicion alcohol test is conducted, verity the
<br />operator does not permit a covered einployee to perform or continue to perform a covered function while the employee Is under the
<br />influence of, or Impaired by alcohol, as shown by the behavioral, speech, or performance indicators of alcohol misuse until: An alcohol
<br />lest Is administered and the employee's alcohol concentration measures less than 0.02. §199.225(b)(4)(111)(A) OR The start of the
<br />employee's next regularly scheduled duty period, but not less than 8 hours following the determination that there is reasonable
<br />suspicion to believe the employee has violated the alcohol misuse prohibitions in Part 199, Subpart C. §199.225(b)(4)(iii)(B), Does
<br />the operator have a process to ensure It does not lake any action under Part 199, Subpart C, against a covered employee based
<br />solely on the employee's behavior and appearance In the absence of an alcohol lest? §199.225(b)(4)(N), Note: This does not prohibit
<br />an operator from taking any action under Its own authority and otherwise consistent with the law.
<br />Plan: Vt, Alcohol Misuse Prevention Program — 1. DOT -Required Alcohol Tests, Reasonable Suspicion/Cause Testing, IV,
<br />DOT Program Requirements- 6, DOT Alcohol Violations and Prohibited Conduct, 7, Violation Consequences and Company
<br />Actions, XIV Appendix G — Reasonable Cause/Suspicion Supervisor Written Record
<br />C-9d' Return-to-DuIY Process and Alcohol Tesiinn
<br />Does the operator have a process to ensure that a covered employee who engages In conduct prohibited by §199.215 through
<br />§199.223 may not return to duty to perform a covered function until the employee has complied with the SAP's evaluation, referral,
<br />and education/treatment process? §40.285(a), §40.305(a), Does the operator have a process to ensure that a covered employee who
<br />engages in conduct prohibited by §199.215 through §199,223 does not return to duty to perform a covered function until the employee
<br />undergoes a return -to -duly alcohol test with a result Indicating an alcohol concentration of less than 0.02? §40.305(a), §199.225(c),
<br />§199.243(c), Does the operator have a process to ensure that all return -to -duty testing Is performed under direct observation?
<br />§40.67(b).
<br />Plan: Vt. Alcohol Misuse Prevention Program— 1, DOT -Required Alcohol Tests, Return -to -Duly Testing, V Anti -Drug Program
<br />2. Drug Tests That Require Direct Observation Procedures, All alcohol testing Is direct observed.
<br />C-9e' Follow -Up Process &Alcohol Testing
<br />Does the operator have a process to ensure the SAP has established a written follow-up testing plan after the SAP determined that
<br />the employee successfully complied with the SAP's return-lo-duty recommendations for education andlor treatment and that a copy
<br />Premium Concrete Services, Inc.- PHMSA DRUGIALCOHOL PLAN
<br />:'-1 HATIONAL COMPLIANCE MANAGEMENT SERVICE. ING. (NCMS) 201 I (update 2021). Tho NCMS plan is
<br />rice sobard of a registered copyright and is projected by copyoghl lev,s in the US, and elsewhere. MI fights
<br />reserved. 48
<br />
|