My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CED Annexation Policy Plan 1992
sbend
>
Public
>
Archived Plan Documents
>
CED Annexation Policy Plan 1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/22/2025 10:03:16 AM
Creation date
4/22/2025 10:02:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Dept of Community Investment
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The growth on the City's fringe has produced a complex pattern of <br />government by multiple jurisdictions. In many areas, there is no discernible <br />difference between what is inside or outside the City. This urban mix of City <br />and County jurisdictions creates confusing service delivery areas promoting <br />administrative duplication and excessive costs among the various units of <br />government such as: <br />• Confusion for proper jurisdictional response by police and fire; <br />• increased County and Township budgets (rise in tax levies) to pay for <br />urban -type services, such as higher roadway maintenance, fire and service <br />delivery systems and administ-rative costs; <br />• generally incompatible land use regulations providing similar neigh- <br />boring properties with inconsistent development patterns; and, <br />• availability and use of City services and facilities paid for and maintained <br />by City residents, but used by County residents. <br />Greater pressure and responsibility is being applied and experienced at both <br />the County and Township level of government for the provision of <br />urban -type services, or what would commonly be viewed as services <br />traditionally provided by the City. Service levels are a reflection of tax rates <br />and both can vary depending upon one's location within the urban area. In <br />fact, a review of published tax rates shows that over the past five year period, <br />the rates in the unincorporated portions of the collar townships have <br />increased while the portion of these same townships located within the <br />corporate limits have actually decreased. Annexation offers a taxing structure <br />that can provide for a coordinated approach to infrastructure improvement <br />and maintenance. A unified growth plan for the City and the proposed <br />annexation areas will alleviate long-term development of redundant services <br />and prevent contradictory land use development. <br />4. The Need for Annexation <br />Annexation is a systematic process that traditionally has been the primary <br />ich cities regulate their physical expansion. But the need and means by wh <br />justification to annex is driven by far more than just a desire for additional <br />land. Areas beyond the City limits have often developed as a legitimate <br />response to the need for larger lot sizes or a more rural setting, or simply the <br />availability of land. But they can also represent attempts to participate in the <br />social, educational, cultural or commercial activities of South Bend without <br />paying the taxes which support them. The issues associated with the need to <br />consider annexation are discussed below. Whether the City annexes or not, <br />the present issues and problems created by growth on the urban fringe will <br />continue to affect the City in the future. <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.