My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-26-87 Council Meeting Minutes
sbend
>
Public
>
Common Council
>
Minutes
>
Common Council Meeting Minutes
>
1987
>
10-26-87 Council Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/16/2013 12:09:41 PM
Creation date
5/16/2013 12:01:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council - City Clerk
City Council - Document Type
Council Mtg Minutes
City Counci - Date
10/26/1987
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
u <br />and a member of the Human Rights Commission, spoke in favor of this bill. Carl <br />Ellison, interim president of the Urban League, read the following into the record: <br />"Members of the Council. My name is Carl Ellison, I live at 1740 Hass Drive. I am <br />pleased to rise in support of the Affirmative Action Ordinance before you in my <br />capacity as the interim president of the Urban League of South Bend and Saint Joseph <br />County. The Affirmative Action Ordinance has been skillfully crafted to accomplish <br />appropriate public purposes without imposing an undue burden on City departments and <br />agencies. Essentially, the ordinance merely requires the components of City <br />government to know where they stand with respect to the employment of covered <br />individuals and with respect to contracting results relative to these interest <br />groups. Logically, the ordinance then provides a reasonably methodology to allow <br />departments and agencies to take incremental steps to mitigate, overtime, deficient <br />conditions in work force representation and contracting results. Accordingly, the <br />Urban League requests that the Common Council unanimously adopt the affirmative <br />action ordinance for these reasons and the following additional ones: 1) The <br />ordinance further affirms City commitment to include disadvantaged groups in <br />municipal administration. 2) The ordinance recognizes the inherent value to the <br />City as a whole of encouraging minority business enterprise formation, development <br />and growth through assuring equal opportunity to compete for and perform contracts <br />for goods and services. 3) The ordinance evidences City desire to continue to play <br />a leadership role in reflecting and demonstrating that the door of opportunity shall <br />remain firmly open for all of our citizens. 4) The ordinance is timely as <br />examination of work force profile and contracting results confirm that minorities <br />remain under represented in many categories of work and contracting. Thus, existing <br />performance in these areas provides sufficient evidence of need for the ordinance to <br />stimulate further progress. Finally, 5) The ordinance takes nothing away from the <br />majority sector of the population. Indeed, the ordinance merely calls for a little <br />additional rational effort to insure that historic barriers to minority penetration <br />of the work force at all levels, and to minority receipt of City contracts, are <br />removed so that minorities have a full and fair chance to experience that portion of <br />the Anerican dream we all cherish - -the ability to compete for a fair share of the <br />pie. Members of the Common Council, I invested several years of life in City <br />government service. I can think of no single piece of legislation that has come <br />before you that is more significant than this one. I request your unanimous <br />adoption of this ordinance as it is the right thing to do. Rhoda Bradshaw, <br />co- chairman of NOW, indicated this bill was long overdue, but she wanted to know who <br />was going to implement and enforce this if it is passed. Roger Volker, 1242 <br />Woodward, spoke in favor of this bill. Ralph Mullins, president of the local <br />chapter of the NAACP, said the bill benefits women and other minorities as well as <br />blacks. Ginny Burns, 54125 Maple Lane, representing the Women's International <br />League for Peace and Freedom, spoke in favor of this bill. Council Member Barcome <br />made a motion to recess, seconded by Council Member Zakrzewski. The motion carried <br />and the meeting was recessed at 7:55 p.m., and reconvened at 8:05 p.m. Council <br />Member Voorde indicated he felt there were two many unanswered questions regarding <br />implementation. He made a motion to continue public hearing on this bill until the <br />next meeting, seconded by Council Member Zakrzewski. The motion failed on a roll <br />call vote of two ayes (Council Members Zakrzewski and Voorde) and seven nays. <br />Council Member Taylor made a motion to recommend this bill to the Council favorable, <br />as amended, seconded by Council Member Beck. The motion carried on a roll call vote <br />of eight ayes and one nay (Council Member Voorde.) <br />BILL NO. 104 -87 A BILL OF THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA, <br />AMENDING CHAPTER 18, ARTICLE 5, COMMONLY REFERRED TO AS <br />"PROCEDURES FOR VACATION OF PUBLIC WAY AND PUBLIC PLACES" <br />This being the time heretofore set for public hearing on the above bill, proponents <br />and opponents were given an opportunity to be heard. Council Attorney, Kathleen <br />Cekanski - Farrand, indicated the bill should be amended in Section 18 -53.8 by making <br />the last paragraph (5) and adding a new paragraph (c) to read: "If the petitioner <br />is the City of South Bend or a Department or Bureau thereof, and if the appraised <br />value is one hundred dollars ($100.00) or more, the requirement to pay the amount of <br />the fair market value of the real estate in question shall be waived." Council <br />Member Voorde made a motion to accept the amendment, seconded by Council Member <br />Beck. The motion carried. Council Members Barcome and Serge made the presentation <br />for the bill. Council Member Barcome indicated over the past several months many <br />taxpayers questioned why the City does not receive a neutral appraisal on such <br />properties as well as the fair market value when approving such vacations. He <br />indicated this bill would require that the petitioner present at the time of filing <br />a written appraisal report showing the fair market value of the property. He <br />indicated this approved the ordinance would require that those properties appraised <br />to be one hundred dollars or more, the petitioner would pay the City the fair market <br />value, as well as the cost for legal advertising and recording, in addition to the <br />appraisal. He indicated that if the property is appraised less than one hundred <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.