Laserfiche WebLink
Criteria for Decision Making <br /> Variance(s) - if applicable <br /> State statutes and the Zoning Ordinance require that certain standards must be met before a <br /> variance can be approved. Please address how the project meets the following criteria: <br /> (1) The approval will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general <br /> welfare of the community, because: <br /> The proposed variances will not be injurious to the public health, safety, and <br /> general welfare of the community. The variances requested are along a common <br /> lot line, interior to the project. <br /> (2) The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance will <br /> not be affected in a substantially adverse manner, because: <br /> The use and value of adjacent properties should not be impacted by the <br /> variances requested because they are interior to the development. <br /> (3) The strict application of the terms of this Chapter would result in practical <br /> difficulties in the use of the property, because: <br /> The strict application of the Ordinance would require setbacks on the interior of <br /> the project, which would result in the development being constructed in a <br /> manner that is not cohesive. The Ordinance recognizes the development of <br /> multiple parcels as a singular zoning lot, but only if under common ownership. <br /> The Ordinance does not recognize a common development under a <br /> public-private partnership. <br /> (4) The variance granted is the minimum necessary, because: <br /> The variances proposed relate only to the interior lot lines. The development <br /> meets the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance on all exterior lot lines, <br /> providing the appropriate buffering and setbacks impacting surrounding <br /> properties. <br /> (5) The variance does not correct a hardship caused by a former or current owner of <br /> the property, because: <br /> The variance requested does not correct a hardship caused by the current or <br /> former owner. The Ordinance does not anticipate a public-private partnership <br /> such as the one proposed. <br />