Laserfiche WebLink
Appraisal Group, Inc. <br />LAND APPRAISAL REPO File No. 1234567 <br />RT <br />Borrower SOUTH BEND BD. OF PUB. WK <br />..Z.Properly <br />Census Tract Map Reference 8 13 % <br />Address 206 BROADWAY <br />City SOUTH BEND CountyST. JOSEPH state IN. ZIPCade 46601 <br />Description LOT 75 EX 20' X 50' SW COR HANEYS ADDITION <br />;'.tiLegal <br />p' Sale Price S N[A Data of Sale N A Loan Term N/A yrs. Property Rights Appraised 0 Fee ❑ Leasehold ❑ De Minimis PUD <br />I—: <br />Actual Real Estate Taxes s N/A (yrl Loan charges to be paid by seller s N/A Other sales concessions N A <br />_. LendedClient BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS Address 13TH FLOOR CO. —CITY BLDG <br />;�;,,�..,• <br />Occupant VACANT LAND A ppraiser CARPENTER Instructions to Appraiser MARKET VALUE <br />�i Location X Urban LJ Suburban Li Rural Good Avg. Fair Poor <br />Built-up ❑ Over 75% X❑ 25% to 75% ❑ Under 25% Employment Stability ❑ ® ❑ ❑ <br />Growth Rate ❑ Fully Dev. ❑ Rapid ❑Steady Slow Convenience to Employment ❑ X❑ ❑ ❑ <br />Property Values ❑ Increasing ❑ Stable X❑ Declining Convenience to Shopping ❑ R ❑ ❑ <br />Demand/Supply ❑ Shortage ❑ In Balance FRI Oversupply Convenience to Schools ❑ R1 ❑ ❑ <br />Marketing Time ❑ Under 3 Mos. ❑ 4-6 Mos. ® Over 6 Mos. Adequacy of Public Transportation ❑ ® ❑ ❑ <br />0 Present Land Use 10 %1 Fmly 10 % 2-4 Family _% Apts. , % Condo _ % Commercial Recreational Facilities ❑ <br />a _% indusirlal 80 % Vacant % Adequacy of Utilities ❑ ® ❑ ❑ <br />Change in Prasent Lend Use ONot Likely ❑ Likely 1'1 Taking Place(') Property Compatibility ❑ ® ❑ ❑ <br />�+~ f'I From VACANT TOPUBLIC USE Protection from Detrimental Conditions ❑ X❑ ❑ ❑ <br />a> Predominant Occupancy Owner Tenant % Vacant Police and Fire Protection <br />❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ <br />Single Family Price Range s to $ Predominant Value S General Appearance of Properties ❑ R1 ❑ ❑ <br />,. Single Family Age yrs. to yrs. Predominant Age yrs Appeal to Market ❑ X❑ ❑ ❑ <br />Comments including those factors, favorable or unfavorable, affecting marketability (e,g, public parks, Schools, view: noise): SUBJECT NEIGHBORHOOD IS LOCATED <br />SOUTH OF A PREVIOUS MODEL CITIES PROJECT WHICH DEMOLISHED MANY STRUCTURES AND REPLACED NONE. <br />SEVERAL OF THE REMAINING HOME OWNERS WERE GIVEN LOANS TO IMPROVE THEIR STRUCTURES HOWEVER MOST <br />OF THE REMAINING STRUCTURES ARE DETERIORATING. RECENT PUBLIC PROGRAM HAS INITIATED APT CONST. <br />Dimensions 40 X 103 X 20 X 50 X 20 X 153 = 5.120 , Sq. Ft. or AXE( Corner Lot <br />Zoning classification B—BUSINESS Present improvements FX1 do ❑ do not conform to zoning regulations <br />Highest and best use ❑ Present use 5?] Other (specify) PUBLIC SERVICE <br />Public Other (Describe) OFF SITE IMPROVEMENTS Topography FLAT <br />Electricity � Street Access X❑ Public ❑Private size FAIR <br />Gas X❑ Surface IMPROVED Shape IRREGULAR <br />75 <br />water 7 Maintenance ® Public ❑ Private View URBAN t <br />San. Sewer © X❑ Storm Sewer ® CurblGutter Drainage AVERAGE <br />❑ Underground Elec. & Tel, X❑ Sidewalk a Street Lights Is the Property located in a HUD Identified Special Flood Hazard Area? ® No ❑ Yes <br />Comments (favorable or unfavorable including any apparent adverse easements, encroachments or other adverse conditions): THERE APPEARS TO BE NO UNFAVORABLE <br />OR ADVERSE EASEMENTS WHICH AFFECT SUBJECT PROPERTY. AS CAN NOTED IN THE ABOVE DIMENSIONS <br />SUBJECT HAS HAD A PORTION OF THE REAR YARD ELIMINATED WHICH LESSENS THE DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL <br />OF THE PROPERTY. <br />The undersigned has recited three recent sales of properties most similar and proximate to subject and has considered these In the market analysis. The description Includes a dollar adjustment <br />reflecting market reaction to those Items of significant variation between the subject and comparable properties. If a significant item in the comparable property Is superior to or more favorable <br />than the subject property, a minus J.) adjustment Is made thus reducing the Indicated value of subject; If a significant Item in the comparable is intartor to or iass lavorable than the sublect <br />property,.! plus f+1 adjustment is made thus increasing the indicated voiva or rna s,Jbiact. <br />ITEM <br />SUBJECT PROPERTY <br />COMPARABLE NO. 1 <br />COMPARABLE NO. 2 <br />COMPARABLE NO. 3 <br />Address <br />210 BROADWAY <br />606 WENGER <br />829 W CALVERT <br />KALEY ST BTWN LWW <br />SOUTH BEND <br />SOUTH BEND <br />SOUTH BEND <br />& HUMBOLT SO. BEND <br />Proximity toSubect <br />NEIGHBORHOOD <br />SIMILAR NEIGH'HOOD <br />BETTER NETGH'HOOD <br />Sales Price <br />sN A <br />s 400.00 <br />- <br />sl 000.40 <br />-:-: <br />$1 000.00 <br />Price <br />sN A <br />s .076 SF <br />s 189 SF <br />$19 SF <br />Q <br />Data Source <br />ASMT INSPECT . <br />MLS DATA <br />MLS DATA <br />MLS DATA <br />Date of sale and <br />DESCRIPTION <br />DESCRIPTION <br />Adjustment <br />DESCRIPTION <br />Adjustment <br />DESCRIPTION <br />Adjustment <br />Time Adjustment <br />1980 <br />+300 <br />1990 <br />-0- <br />1985 <br />+250 <br />Li,t <br />Location <br />FAIR <br />FAIR <br />FAIR <br />AVERAGE <br />-250 <br />X.. <br />SiteNiew <br />40 X 103 ETC <br />40 X 132 <br />-300 <br />50 X 132 <br />-500 <br />40 X 132 <br />-300 <br />Q <br />UTILS <br />WATER SEWER <br />WATER SEWER <br />WATER SEWER <br />WATER SEWER <br />12' <br />ZONING <br />B-BUS <br />B-BUS <br />A-RES <br />A-RES <br />BETTER <br />NEIGH'HOOD <br />-300 <br />Sales or Financing <br />Concessions <br />Not Adm. Total) <br />Plus Elmi nu <br />s. <br />S 500 <br />inus. <br />usKMinus <br />S —600 <br />Value <br />Y, <br />t3CEPklu..so .-,X,5M- dinu, <br />>Indicated <br />. <br />. <br />PiuCP'al <br />of Subject <br />Grp;ISO. <br />400 <br />500 <br />400 <br />Comments on Market Data: NO 1 IS MORE COMPARABLE TO SUBJECT BECAUSE IT IS IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND HAS THE <br />SAME INFLUENCES CONTROLING IT. <br />Comments <br />and Conditions of Appraisal: SUBJECT IS AVAILABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT, HOWEVER, THE CONFIGURATION OF THE 'LOT <br />CREATES A POTENTIAL. LESSENING TO DEVELOPMENT <br />D; <br />2- Final <br />Reconciliation: THE SUBJECT MATTER OF THIS APPRAISAL RELATES MORE DIRECTLY TO NO 1 COMP BECAUSE IT IS <br />J_ <br />CLOSER IN LOCATION THAN THE OTHERS. <br />3' <br />I ESTIMATE THE MARKET VALUE, AS DEFINED, OF SUBJECT PAOPERTY AS OF APRIL 11 , 19 95 to be s 450.00 <br />Appraiser(sl .�.— Review Appraiser (if applicable) <br />DOUGLAS L . C ENT R XD Did ❑ Did Not Physically Inspect Property <br />5187.1 MCS, Richardson, TX 75081 {2141 699-77B3 MCS Form LA2 <br />