My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Fixing the Maxium Salary for the City Attorney
sbend
>
Public
>
Common Council
>
Legislation
>
Ordinances
>
1982
>
Fixing the Maxium Salary for the City Attorney
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/10/2013 8:59:18 AM
Creation date
5/9/2013 3:07:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council - City Clerk
City Council - Document Type
Ordinances
City Counci - Date
9/13/1982
Ord-Res Number
7099-82
Bill Number
97-82
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR <br />SOUTH BEND, INDIANA <br />Members of the Common Council -2- August 18, 1982 <br />of sources. It has been only within the last two years that we have <br />moved toward a clearer identification of those costs; yet for many <br />years the total salary of a number of City employees was not reflected <br />in the salary ordinance due to multiple funding of their positions. <br />I am pleased that we are moving toward a clearer identification <br />of the overall funding and payment picture of both personnel and other <br />City costs. In fact, I plan to initiate a study of alternatives to <br />the fragmented funding by which we now budget. <br />To place the increases received by the two individuals concerned <br />in these ordinances in the above context of the traditional handling <br />of such situations clarifies why I failed to approach the Council <br />earlier to authorize the increases they deserve. The current approach <br />is, of course, the correct one and the one I shall follow in the future. <br />As you are aware, these increased amounts have been paid to these <br />persons for several months, the City Attorney since January, 1982, and <br />the City Engineer since April, 1982. I believe at the time I authorized <br />these increases, as I still believe, that the additional responsibilities <br />assumed by these persons, whether due to change in state law, as in the <br />case of the City Attorney, or by specific additional project duties, as <br />in the case of the City Engineer, clearly warranted additional compensa- <br />tion be paid to them from the particular funds of those functions. Upon <br />considering the circumstances within which I acted earlier and within <br />which I now bring the ordinances before you, I request your favorable <br />consideration of these ordinances. <br />Sincer.1-y, <br />i <br />j <br />Rog 0. arent <br />ROP:pdc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.