Laserfiche WebLink
SOUTH BEND (INDIANA) REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION <br />STATEMENT DISCLOSING THE IMPACT OF AMENDING THE RIVER EAST <br />DEVELOPMENT AREA AND RIVER EAST ALLOCATION AREA NO. 1 <br />4 <br />ESTIMATED IMPACT OF AMENDING THE AREA, THE ALLOCATION AREA NO. 1, AND THE PLAN <br />Scenario I: Present Situation (Prior to Amending the Area, the Allocation Area No. 1, and the Plan) <br />(Cont’d) <br />Allocation Area No. 1 is $280,863,535, is multiplied by the certified 2024 tax rate for the South Bend – Portage <br />Township taxing district, less the combined South Bend Community School Corporation referendum rates of <br />$0.3840, for a net tax rate of $4.9708 (the “Net South Bend – Portage Township Tax Rate”) (per $100 of <br />assessed value), to generate an estimated annual real property Tax Increment of $8,015,510, after the application <br />of the Circuit Breaker Tax Credits. The incremental assessed value of the South Bend – Clay Township taxing <br />district portion of the Allocation Area No. 1 is $3,063,528, multiplied by the certified 2024 tax rate for the South <br />Bend – Clay Township taxing district, less the combined South Bend Community School Corporation Referendum <br />Rates of $0.3840, for a net tax rate of $4.9544 (the “Net South Bend – Clay Township Tax Rate”) (per $100 of <br />assessed value), to generate an estimated annual real property Tax Increment of $101,290, after the application <br />of the Circuit Breaker Tax Credits. <br />Scenario II: Assumes the Area, Allocation Area No. 1, and the Plan are Amended <br />Scenario II depicts the impact on the overlapping taxing units (holding all other factors constant) if the Area, <br />Allocation Area No. 1, and Plan are amended, and assumes that the incremental assessed value from the Future <br />Development is captured, and the net assessed value of the Future Development is added to the assessed value <br />of the overlapping taxing units. <br />The Commission intends to capture an illustrative $10,000,000 of incremental assessed value from the Future <br />Development in the Expansion Allocation Area located within the South Bend – Portage Township taxing district. <br />Multiplied by the Net South Bend – Portage Township Tax Rate, net of the application of the Circuit Breaker Tax <br />Credit, and LIT PTRC, the incremental assessed value is estimated to generate $361,480 of annual net Tax <br />Increment in the South Bend – Portage Township taxing district. The Commission intends to capture an illustrative <br />$10,000,000 of incremental assessed value from the Future Development in the Expansion Allocation Area <br />located within the South Bend – Clay Township taxing district. Multiplied by the Net South Bend – Clay Township <br />Tax Rate, net of the application of the Circuit Breaker Tax Credit, and LIT PTRC, the incremental assessed value <br />is estimated to generate $361,280 of annual net Tax Increment in the South Bend – Clay Township taxing district. <br />Scenario II also depicts the impact on the School Corporation’s Referendum tax rates, which may not be included <br />in the Tax Increment calculation. It is estimated that the Future Development would reduce the School <br />Corporation’s Debt Referendum tax rate by $0.0001 and increases the School Corporation's Operating <br />Referendum levy by $66,680. This Scenario does not show any other impacts on the taxing units within the South <br />Bend - Portage Township taxing district and South Bend - Clay Township taxing district as a result of the <br />Expansion Allocation Area. <br />Scenario III: Assumes the Area, Allocation Area No. 1, and the Plan are NOT Amended <br />Scenario III represents the impact on the overlapping taxing units if the Area, Allocation Area No. 1, and the Plan <br />are not amended, assumes the Expansion Areas and Expansion Allocation Area are not established, and <br />therefore, assumes the Future Development does not occur as a result of the Projects not being funded. <br />Impact Summary <br />In the 2024 Amending Resolution, the Commission finds that the amendment of the Area and Allocation Area No. <br />1 will result in new property taxes that would not have been generated without this new allocation provision. The <br />Commission cannot finance the Projects without the Tax Increment from the Future Development. Therefore, the <br />Commission has determined that the capture of increase in assessed value from the Future Development will not <br />have a negative impact on anticipated revenues or the tax rates of the taxing units that are wholly or partially <br />located in the Expansion Allocation Area. Without the Tax Increment, the Projects would not be funded, and <br />therefore, the Future Development would not occur, the property would remain undeveloped, and the tax base <br />would remain unchanged. During the period of the Tax Increment capture, the tax base of the overlapping taxing