My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
62-24 Alley Vacation - South Chestnut Street and South Walnut Street (Substitute)
sbend
>
Public
>
Common Council
>
Legislation
>
Upcoming Bills
>
2024
>
10-28-2024
>
62-24 Alley Vacation - South Chestnut Street and South Walnut Street (Substitute)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/28/2024 6:10:23 PM
Creation date
10/23/2024 9:23:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council - City Clerk
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Filed in Clerk's Office <br />O C T 0 9 2024 <br />Bianca Tirado <br />City Clerk, South Bend, IN <br />INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM <br />BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS <br />DATE: February 23, 2024 <br />TO: Kyle Ludlow, Public Works <br />Kara Boyles. Engineering <br />Zach Hurst, Engineering <br />Chris Dressel, Community Investment <br />Derek Erquhart, Fire Department <br />Brad Rohrscheib, Police Department <br />FROM: Theresa Heffner, Clerk (theffner@southbendin.gov) <br />SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR RECOMMENDATIONS — ALLEY VACATION <br />APPLICANT: Ariel Stanley/Masterbilt Precision Machining <br />LOCATION: 325 S. Walnut St. <br />PLEASE INSERT YOUR RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE APPROPRIATE FIELD BELOW, BASED <br />ON THE FOLLOWING I.C. 36-7-3-13 CRITERIA: <br />1. The vacation would/would not hinder the growth or orderly development of the unit or neighborhood <br />in which it is located or to which it is contiguous. <br />2. The vacation would/would not make access to the lands of the aggrieved person by means of public <br />way difficult or inconvenient. <br />3. The vacation would/would not hinder the public's access to a church, school or other public building <br />or place. <br />4. The vacation would/would not hinder the use of a public right-of-way by the neighborhood in which <br />it is located or to which it is contiguous. <br />PUBLIC WORKS/ENGINEERING: Favorable <br />COMMUNITY INVESTMENT: Favorable <br />• The vacation would not hinder the growth or orderly development of the unit or neighborhood in <br />which it is located or to which it is contiguous. <br />• The vacation would not make access to the lands of the aggrieved person by means of public way <br />difficult or inconvenient. <br />• The vacation would not hinder the public's access to a church, school or other public building or <br />place. <br />• The vacation would not hinder the use of a public right-of-way by the neighborhood in which it is <br />located or to which it is contiguous. <br />FIRE: Favorable Recommendation <br />POLICE: Favorable recommendation <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.