Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR MEETING APRIL 15, 1996 <br />that tax abatement for the needy was important, but abatement for <br />the wealthy is ridiculous. Jim.Cierziniak, 1156 E. Victoria, <br />spoke against the abatement. Council Member Coleman indicated <br />the City is vying against Penn and Granger for homes, and if we <br />do not grow our taxes will never go down. Council Member Kelly <br />made a motion to recommend this bill to the Council favorable, <br />seconded by Council Member Luecke. The motion carried. <br />BILL NO. 19 -96 A BILL OF THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH <br />BEND, INDIANA, APPROVING THE SALE OF PARK PROPERTY <br />This being the time heretofore set for public hearing on the <br />above bill, proponents and opponents were given an opportunity to <br />be heard. Council Member Broden reported that the Parks and <br />Recreation Committee had met on this bill and recommended it to <br />the Council favorable. Betsy Harriman, administrative director <br />of Parks, made the presentation for the bill. She indicated this <br />bill transfer real estate to South Bend Heritage Foundation for <br />use in its West LaSalle Street revitalization project. She <br />indicated the park playground equipment will be relocated to the <br />Charles Martin Center. Gene Oakly, 2614 York, spoke in favor of <br />this bill. Jeff Gibney, Director of the South Bend Heritage <br />Foundation, indicated they were currently working on the second <br />phase of their revitalization program, and they will be building <br />a home on this property. Council Member Pfeifer made a motion to <br />recommend this bill to the Council favorable, seconded by Council <br />Member Zakrzewski. Council Member Luecke reported that he is an <br />employee of South Bend Heritage, but will receive no personal <br />gain from this project, so he will be voting on the bill. The <br />motion carried. <br />BILL NO. 2 -96 A BILL OF THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH <br />BEND, INDIANA, AMENDING CHAPTER 5 OF THE MUNICIPAL <br />CODE TO REVISE REQUIREMENTS AS TO IDENTIFICATION <br />OF ANIMALS, TO REVISE PROVISIONS FOR ANIMAL <br />CONTROL AND PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS <br />Public hearing on this bill was continued from March 25. Kathy <br />Dempsey, Director of Code Enforcement, indicated this substitute <br />bill has been discussed and refined at several meetings, however, <br />more amendments will be offered this evening. Council Member <br />Coleman suggested the six month waiting period of micro chipping <br />should be deleted from the ordinance. He made a motion to amend <br />Section 5 -30, second paragraph, to remove the last sentence, the <br />paragraph would then read JAll impounded dogs or cats which will <br />become adopted shall be permanently identified with a microchip, <br />at the expense of the new owner .1, seconded by Council Member <br />Luecke. The motion carried on a roll call vote of eight ayes and <br />one abstention (Council Member Hosinski.) Council Member Pfeifer <br />made a motion to amend Section 5 -5, on page 9, by altering the <br />members of the Commission to include a lay person who has no <br />vested interest, but is an animal lover, seconded by Council <br />Member Washington. The motion failed. Council Member Varner <br />made a motion to amend Section 5 -5, to read: IThe members of the <br />Commission shall serve at the pleasure of the appointing <br />authority and each member shall serve until a qualified successor <br />is duly appointed. All appointments shall be made for three year <br />terms, however, the initial appointments shall serve as follows: <br />The member appointed pursuant to Section 5 -4(a) shall serve for <br />one year; the member appointed pursuant to Section 5 -4(b) shall <br />serve for two years; and the member and alternate member <br />appointed pursuant to Section 5 -4 shall serve for three years., <br />seconded by Council Member Luecke. The motion carried. Council <br />Member Luecke made a motion to delete Section 5 -1 (r), sub- <br />section (7) (b). In Section 5 -33 (h) the fine would change for <br />dogs that have been impounded more than once in a twenty -four <br />(24) month period to $50 for each impoundment. Section 5 -4, <br />subparagraph 8 would be renumbered to subparagraph would be <br />renumbered to paragraph 7, seconded by Council Member Pfeifer. <br />The motion failed on a roll call vote of four ayes, four nays <br />