My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-09-98 Council Meeting Minutes
sbend
>
Public
>
Common Council
>
Minutes
>
Common Council Meeting Minutes
>
1998
>
02-09-98 Council Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2013 12:05:17 PM
Creation date
4/23/2013 11:15:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council - City Clerk
City Council - Document Type
Council Mtg Minutes
City Counci - Date
2/9/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
REGULAR MEETING FEBRUARY 9, 1998 <br />B. That the estimate of the value of the redevelopment or <br />rehabilitation is reasonable for projects of this nature; <br />C. That the estimate of the number of individuals who will <br />be employed or whose employment will be retained by the <br />Petitioner can reasonably be expected to result from the <br />proposed described redevelopment or rehabilitation; <br />D. That the estimate of the annual salaries of those <br />individuals who will be employed or whose employment <br />will be retained by the Petitioner can be reasonably <br />expected to result from the proposed redevelopment or <br />rehabilitation: <br />E. That the other benefits about which information was <br />requested are benefits that can be reasonably expected to <br />result from the proposed described redevelopment or <br />rehabilitation; and <br />F. That the totality of benefits is sufficient to justify <br />the requested deduction, all of which satisfy the <br />requirements of Indiana Code 6- 1.1- 12.1 -3. <br />SECTION III. The Common Council hereby determines and finds that <br />the proposed described redevelopment or rehabilitation can be <br />reasonably expected to yield benefits identified in the Statement <br />of Benefits set forth as Sections I through II of the Petition <br />for Real Property Tax Abatement Consideration and that the <br />Statement of Benefits form prescribed by the State Board of <br />Accounts are sufficient to justify the deduction granted under <br />Indiana Code 6 -1.1- 12.1 -3. <br />SECTION IV. The Common Council hereby accepts the report and <br />recommendation of the Human Resources and Economic Development <br />Committee that the area herein described be designated an <br />Economic Revitalization Area and hereby adopts a Resolution <br />designating this area as an Economic Revitalization Area for <br />purposes of real property tax abatement. <br />SECTION V. The designation as an Economic Revitalization Area <br />shall be limited to two (2) calendar years from the date of the <br />adoption of this Resolution by the Common Council. <br />SECTION VI. The Common Council hereby determines that the <br />property owner is qualified for and is granted property tax <br />deduction for a period of ten (10) years. <br />SECTION VII. The Common Council directs the City Clerk to cause <br />notice of the adoption of this Declaratory Resolution for Real <br />Property Tax Abatement to be published pursuant to Indiana Code <br />5 -3 -1 and Indiana Code 6 -1.1- 12.1 -2.5, said publication providing <br />notice of the public hearing before the Common Council on the <br />proposed confirming of said declaration. <br />SECTION VIII. This Resolution shall be in full force and effect <br />from and after its adoption by the Common Council and approval by <br />the Mayor. <br />/s/ Roland Kelly <br />Member of the Common Council <br />A public hearing was held on the resolution at this time. <br />Council Member Kelly reported that the Community and Economic <br />Development Committee had met on this bill and recommends it to <br />the Council favorable. Mark Tarner, president of South Bend <br />Chocolate, made the presentation for the resolution. He advised <br />they were requesting abatement for the Center City Associates <br />building. Council Member Kelly made a motion to adopt the <br />resolution, seconded by Council Member Pfeifer. The resolution <br />was adopted by a roll call vote of seven ayes (Council Member <br />Hosinski was not in the Chambers.) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.