My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Opening of Proposals - WWTP Solar Guaranteed Energy Savings Contract Proj. No. 124-015 - Ameresco
sbend
>
Public
>
Public Works
>
Board of Works Documents
>
2024
>
Opening of Quotations/Proposals
>
Opening of Proposals - WWTP Solar Guaranteed Energy Savings Contract Proj. No. 124-015 - Ameresco
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/17/2025 2:51:56 PM
Creation date
5/28/2024 3:12:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board of Public Works
Document Type
Projects
Document Date
5/28/2024
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
283
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Table of Contents <br />AMERESCO, INC. <br />NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS <br />(In thousands, except per share amounts) <br />Estimated amortization expense for existing debt discount and debt issuance costs for the next five succeeding fiscal years is as follows <br />Estimated Amortization <br />2024 <br />$ <br />5,801 <br />2025 <br />$ <br />3,158 <br />2026 <br />$ <br />2,363 <br />2027 <br />$ <br />1,378 <br />2028 <br />$ <br />1,245 <br />18. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT <br />We recognize certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value on a recurring basis (at least annually). Fair value is defined as the price that would be received for an asset or <br />paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the <br />measurement date. Three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value are as follows: <br />Level 1: Inputs are based on unadjusted quoted prices for identical instruments traded in active markets. <br />Level 2: Inputs are based on quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model - <br />based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of <br />the assets or liabilities. <br />Level 3: Inputs are generally unobservable and typically reflect management's estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. The <br />fair values are therefore determined using model -based techniques that include option pricing models, discounted cash flow models, and similar techniques. <br />The following table presents the input level used to determine the fair values of our financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis: <br />Assets <br />Interest rate swap instruments <br />Liabilities <br />Interest rate swap instruments <br />Make -whole provisions <br />Contingent consideration <br />Total liabilities <br />Fair Value as of December 31, <br />Level 2023 2022 <br />2 $ 3,970 $ 5,202 <br />2 $ 629 $ 9 <br />2 6,012 5,348 <br />3 1,465 4,158 <br />$ 8,106 $ 9,515 <br />The fair value of our interest rate swaps was determined using cash flow analysis on the expected cash flow of the contract in combination with observable market -based inputs, <br />including interest rate curves and implied volatility. As part of this valuation, we considered the credit ratings of the counterparties to the interest rate swaps to determine if a <br />credit risk adjustment was required. <br />The fair value of our make -whole provisions was determined by comparing them against the rates of similar debt instruments under similar terms without a make -whole <br />provision obtained from various highly rated third -party pricing sources. <br />The fair value of our contingent consideration liabilities was determined by evaluating the acquired asset's future financial forecasts and evaluating which, if any, of the <br />cumulative revenue targets, financial metrics and/or milestones are likely to be met. We classified contingent consideration related to certain acquisitions within level 3 of the <br />fair value hierarchy because the fair value is derived using significant unobservable inputs, which include discount rates, probability -weighted cash flows, and volatility. We <br />determined the fair value of our contingent consideration obligations based on a probability -weighted income approach derived from financial performance estimates and <br />probability assessments of the attainment of certain targets for some <br />98 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.