Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR MEETING NOVEMBER 11, 2002 <br />The following person spoke in opposition to the Resolution. <br />Ms. Rita Kopala, 66559 Ivy Road, Lakeville, Indiana, informed the Council that she owns one <br />hundred fifty (150) acres of land. She noted that at the last County Council meeting the twenty (20) <br />acre rule was passed. She further noted that the South Bend Tribune never gave notice of the twenty <br />(20) acre rule until after it was approved at the County Council meeting. In February of this year <br />the Council Chambers was full of people who objected to the twenty (20) acre rule and it was put <br />off until the future. Again the South Bend Tribune never notified the public of this meeting and no <br />one spoke against this discussion in October when it was passed. No one knew it was happening. <br />Ms. Kopala stated that there are only two (2) counties in Indiana that have the twenty (20) acre rule <br />and that is because most people do not want their rights and their land taken away from them. She <br />talked at length about notification concerning laws that are being enacted and stated that there are <br />no radio programs or newspapers to inform the public about what is really taking place. <br />There was no one else present wishing to speak in opposition to this Resolution. <br />In rebuttal, Mr. Sante stated that at the meeting that was held in October when the County Council <br />adopted the Comprehensive Plan there was a discussion of the twenty (20) acre rule. He noted that <br />the twenty (20) acre rule has been in effect since 1979. The Comprehensive Plan proposes not to <br />change the twenty (20) acre rule but to leave it in effect and therefore in effect no new legislation <br />is being proposed regarding the twenty (20) acre rule. Mr. Sante further stated that in 1998 an <br />eighteen (18) member committee made up primarily of farmers was established to study whether or <br />not the twenty (20) acre rule was working as intended in order to preserve farm land. This was being <br />done even before the Comprehensive Plan process began. They studied the twenty (20) acre rule for <br />about one and one -half years (11/2) years and the consensus was that the twenty (20) acre rule was <br />working as intended to preserve farmland and to prevent sprawl. It was recommended that it be left <br />in and that it be revisited in another five (5) years to see whether or not it was still working at that <br />point. There was convincing evidence that farmland was being preserved and sprawl was being <br />avoided. He noted that far less farmland is being taken out of production than most people believe <br />and they did have facts to show that only around fifteen per cent (15 %) to twenty per cent (20 %) <br />of that land is actually be converted from farm land to something else with the vast majority either <br />still being used as farmland or not being farmed. <br />Councilmember King made a motion to adopt this Resolution. Councilmember Coleman seconded <br />the motion which carried and the Resolution was adopted by a roll call vote of eight (8) ayes. <br />BILLS - FIRST READING <br />BILL NO. 89 -02 FIRST READING ON A BILL AMENDING THE ZONING <br />ORDINANCE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE CITY <br />OF SOUTH BEND AND HAVING A STREET ADDRESS <br />OF 809 N. MICHIGAN STREET <br />This bill had first reading. Councilmember Coleman made a motion to refer this bill to the Area <br />Plan Commission. Councilmember Varner seconded the motion which carried by a voice vote of <br />eight (8) ayes. <br />BILL NO. 90 -02 FIRST READING ON A BILL AMENDING THE ZONING <br />ORDINANCE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 615 <br />NORTH MICHIGAN STREET IN THE CITY OF SOUTH <br />BEND, INDIANA <br />This bill had first reading. Councilmember Varner made a motion to refer this bill to the Area Plan <br />-20- <br />1 <br />1 <br />