Laserfiche WebLink
Staff Report -PC#0151-23 <br />12/18/2023 <br />Plan Implementation/Other Plans: <br />The petition is consistent with the South Bend City Plan (2006) H 1.1 Encourage residential <br />developments to contain a mix of housing types, densities, price ranges, and amenities. <br />2. Current Conditions and Character: <br />The parcels are currently vacant at this site and the sites directly to the south. Residential <br />properties line the parcels to the east and north. South and west, Lincoln Way West is a mix of <br />residential structures and a wide variety of nonresidential uses. <br />3. Most Desirable Use: <br />The most desirable use is one that supports the neighborhood through infill to increase housing <br />stock and promote a mixed use and pedestrian scale outcome. <br />4. Conservation of Property Values: <br />The use and value of the adjacent properties should not be negatively impacted. Development at <br />this site will increase housing stock and create a denser, safer neighborhood. <br />5. Responsible Development and Growth: <br />It is responsible development and growth to allow for the infill development in this neighborhood <br />along a major city corridor. <br />Variance(s) <br />The petitioner is seeking the following variance(s): <br />1) from the maximum 1.5 stories in a cottage court to 2 stories <br />2) from the maximum 9 units in a cottage court to 10 units <br />3) from the maximum 2 units per cottage in a cottage court to 4 units <br />State statutes and the Zoning Ordinance require that certain standards must be met before a <br />variance can be approved. The standards and their justifications are as follows: <br />(1) The approval will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general <br />welfare of the community. <br />The approval of variances 1, 2, and 3 should not be injurious to the general welfare of the <br />community. These variances allow for higher density development that is consistent with the <br />character of the neighborhood. <br />(2) The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance will not <br />be affected in a substantially adverse manner. <br />The use and value of the area adjacent to the property should not be affected in a substantially <br />adverse manner. The development will be consistent with the character of the neighborhood and <br />will not have a greater impact than a use that would have been permitted in an NC zoned district. <br />(3) The strict application of the terms of this Chapter would result in practical difficulties <br />in the use of the property. <br />A higher density cottage court on this irregularly shaped parcel would more closely reflect the <br />character of the surrounding neighborhood and support more housing stock in a parcel along a <br />major city corridor and proximate to the downtown area. <br />(4) The variance granted is the minimum necessary. <br />The intent in NC zoned districts is to develop higher intensity urban neighborhood centers. <br />Rezoning to U3 with variances to allow for a higher density cottage court is the minimum <br />necessary because the higher density cottage court preserves the character of the neighborhood <br />and supports greater housing stock in a parcel that was previously zoned NC. <br />(5) The variance granted does not correct a hardship caused by a former or current owner <br />of the property. <br />SOUTH BEND PLAN COMMISSION Page 4 of 5 <br />