My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2 Minutes 03-14-13 Meeting
sbend
>
Public
>
Redevelopment Commission
>
Agendas & Packets
>
2013
>
03-28-13
>
2 Minutes 03-14-13 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/13/2014 12:31:56 PM
Creation date
3/25/2013 1:53:27 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
South Bend Redevelopment Commission <br />Regular Meeting —March 14, 2013 <br />requirements, etc. It can be pretty flexible, but not too flexible. We would like to make it <br />more flexible, more development friendly. <br />Mr. Meteiver noted that when an area is being developed there are constraints by the <br />city's zoning ordinance. The PUD provides a clean slate for that area and you can <br />develop whatever plan there is for development and use that you want. It's not <br />completely free form, in that the Commission needs to establish some parameters. What <br />Mr. Kain has stated is when we established those parameters, they were fairly rigid; now <br />we want to amend those parameters. <br />Mr. Varner noted he would have expected that the planning from the PUD originally <br />would have been flexible enough to allow staff to make the decisions without Data Realty <br />having to come to the Redevelopment Commission for these things. Mr. Kain responded <br />that Data Realty's experience is the reason for this request. <br />Ms. Jones asked that 16:00 how do you address the issues with all five. Mr. Kain <br />responded that one of the issues was where their building is placed, they were asking for <br />a variance of landscaping on the south side of the building because trees already exist <br />there. <br />Ms. Jones also asked whether the $3,500 of filing fees needed that with the additional <br />request for the $3,500 for filing fees; is that after the amending to file it, or will it be filed <br />before the process of amending. Mr. Kam responded that it gets filed after the amending. <br />Upon a motion by Mr. Downes, seconded by Mr. Alford and unanimously carried, the <br />Commission authorized staff to proceed to with revisions to the Ignition Park Planned <br />Used Development. <br />C. West Washington- Chapin Development Area <br />(1) Resolution No. 3123 approving and authorizing the execution of an Addendum to the <br />Master Agency Agreement with the Board of Public Works (William Streetscape <br />Project) <br />Mr. Relos noted that Resolution No. 3123 approves an Addendum to the Master Agency <br />Agreement for the William Streetscape Project. This project will remove and replace <br />cross walks, curbing, sidewalks, and tree lawns along the west side of William Street <br />between LaSalle and Washington. <br />The Commission currently owns the old Basic Machine property at the southwest corner <br />of LaSalle and William. The sidewalk along that half block has been slowly sinking for <br />several years. The project will repair that problem and add new tree lawns to match the <br />east side of William Street. <br />As part of the project, new ADA compliant cross walks will be installed at the <br />intersections of LaSalle, Colfax, and Washington, complimenting the recently announced <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.