Laserfiche WebLink
MR. WALTON: We're going to make it a lot more esthetically pleasing, that's our number one goal right <br /> now. There's going to be some minor structural changes in the first phase, we've got to install some floor <br /> drains, some things of that nature but nothing significant in the plan so far. <br /> MR. VELLEMAN: Because that will have to become ADA compliant if you change the use, is that correct? <br /> MR. WALTON: Yeah we plan to make it ADA compliant. <br /> MR. MATTHYS: Didn't we approve something similar to that for the old State Theatre not so long ago? <br /> MR.VELLEMAN: Yeah the State Theatre is also putting in a small micro-brewery as well. <br /> IN FAVOR <br /> There was no one present to speak in favor of this petition. <br /> REMONSTRANCE <br /> There was no one present to speak in remonstrance of this petition. <br /> MR. CRUMLISH: Mr. Lyons, what is the off street loading requirement for a brewery? <br /> MR. LYONS: It's actually based on the restaurant portion and the manufacturing portion separately. We did <br /> discuss with them the need that in the future they may need a parking calc but until they've worked out exactly <br /> their layout for the restaurant portion, because that would be their largest loading for the parking calc. That <br /> they may in future have to come back for a parking variance,they don't know at this time. <br /> MR. CRUMLISH: I used the term loading in terms of trucks. <br /> MR. LYONS: Oh,for loading? <br /> MR. CRUMLISH: Yeah. Don't they need a dock? <br /> MR. LYONS: No a building under 10,000 square feet would not need a loading dock. <br /> MR. CRUMLISH: I didn't know the area of the building. <br /> A motion to send the Special Exception to the Common Council with a Favorable Recommendation was <br /> made by Mr. Matthys and seconded by Mr. Urbanski. The motion carried unanimously. <br /> After hearing the evidence on the petition, the Area Board of Zoning Appeals find that you did satisfy <br /> the Standards as set forth in I.C. 36-7-4-918.5; therefore, the petition for Special Exception was sent to <br /> the Common Council with a Favorable Recommendation. <br /> Based on the testimony presented,the Area Board of Zoning Appeals, after careful consideration, finds this <br /> Special Exception sent to the Common Council with a Favorable Recommendation and will issue written <br /> Finding of Facts. <br /> PETITION SENT TO THE COMMON COUNCIL WITH A FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION <br />