Laserfiche WebLink
r <br /> A psi `� RECEIVED <br /> a <br /> ° t'�'''�;�'"�4� \±`` CITY of SOUTH BEND k A' <br /> 0,Avi� � . ' D .IUN 18 1985 <br /> 0„.. �` ' !s, COMMON COUNCIL <br /> 't vI AREA PLAN COMM. <br /> �∎744,V...%:- .a jr° ; <br /> J d. <br /> �\ �«' � '�' 441 COUNTY-CITY BUILDING SOUTH BEND,INDIANA 46601 <br /> Area 219 284-9321 <br /> BEVERLIE J.BECK <br /> President <br /> EUGENIA BRABOY June 17, 1985 <br /> Vice President <br /> JOSEPH T.SERGE <br /> Chairman, <br /> Committee of the Whole The Area Plan Commission <br /> of St. Joseph County, Indiana <br /> ___ 11th Floor, County-City Building <br /> South Bend, Indiana 46601 <br /> JOSEPH T.SERGE <br /> FrrstDistrrct RE: Rezoning Petition for Property Located <br /> EUGENIABRASOY At 3308 East Jefferson <br /> Second District <br /> BEVERLIE J.BECK <br /> Third District Dear Commission Members: <br /> ANN B.PUZZELLO <br /> Fourth District Since I will not be in the City when you have the <br /> ROBERT G.TAYLOR public hearing on the above-described rezoning, I am writing <br /> FifthOistrict <br /> to you and ask that this letter be made an official part <br /> TH SMASDZstrict SKI of your records at your meeting of June 18th. <br /> BEVERLY D.CRONE <br /> At Large I have several serious concerns regarding the proposed <br /> ALBPASZEK rezoning from "A" Residential, "A" Height and Area, to <br /> At Large "B" Residential, "D" Height and Area. These concerns <br /> JOHN VOORDE <br /> At large include the following: <br /> K.CEKANSKI-FARRAND (1) The fact that there is a petition containing <br /> Council Attorney at least 92 remonstrators against the rezoning. <br /> (2) That the proposed use is so intensive for property <br /> so close to railroad tracks . <br /> (3) That the proposed setbacks of fifteen feet (15 ' ) <br /> are not enough and that at least thirty feet (30' ) <br /> should be considered as being an appropriate <br /> setback from adjoining properties. <br /> (4) That the wooded area should remain intact and a <br /> privacy fence should be a condition. <br /> (5) That Sunnymede has not been extended, and <br /> increased traffic should not be placed on 35th <br /> Street since that would adversely affect that <br /> neighborhood. <br /> (6) That the proposed ingress and egress to the proposed <br /> rezoned land is unacceptable based on the high <br /> volume traffic in the area. <br />