My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-24-01 Community & Economic Development
sbend
>
Public
>
Common Council
>
Minutes
>
Committee Meeting Minutes
>
2001
>
10-24-01 Community & Economic Development
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2013 3:28:39 PM
Creation date
2/15/2013 3:28:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council - City Clerk
City Council - Document Type
Committee Mtg Minutes
City Counci - Date
10/24/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
totttutiUti *port: <br /> QCommunttt attb ee0114MiC ] tiopment ommitt Fez <br /> The October 24,2001 joint meeting of the Community and Economic Development Committee was <br /> called to order by its Chairperson Council Member Roland Kelly at 3:07 p.m. in the Council <br /> Informal Meeting Room. <br /> Persons in attendance included Council Members Varner, King, Coleman and Kelly; Michael <br /> Beitzinger, Kevin Hunter, Director of Community and Economic Development Jon Hunt, Tony <br /> Mroczkiewicz of the Indiana Regional Council of Carpenters and Millwrights, and Kathy <br /> Cekanski Farrand, Council Attorney. <br /> Council Member Kelly welcomed everyone to the meeting which is aimed at continuing the <br /> discussion of the review of the tax abatement ordinance and its proposed changes. He noted that <br /> the Council Attorney has prepared a memo(copy attached) which addresses an introductory section <br /> which would summarize the basic categories of abatement and addresses "safety net" language. It <br /> would supplement Mr. Beitzinger's draft ordinance if agreed upon by the Committee. <br /> Mr. Beitzinger noted that there has been discussion to consider having three (3) years as the base <br /> abatement with the different items being added together to add additional years of abatement. <br /> Council Member King voiced concern since he thought all proposed amendments would be kept in <br /> one document. He also noted that he thought that points would be awarded based on certain <br /> thresholds being met based on a point system. <br /> Council Member Kelly noted that the proposed system is becoming too voluminous. <br /> Council Member King stated that at the June 6th Committee meeting we discussed incorporating <br /> the requirement of a legally binding agreement concept. He noted that just because something <br /> becomes difficult should not mean that we do not do it. Better accountability is also one of the <br /> goals of revamping the current ordinance. He suggested that we focus on the definitions, then <br /> address the tentative point values,and then address the thresholds. <br /> Council Member Varner noted that we should be mindful that the overall goal of a tax abatement <br /> system is to create assessment. He further noted that both Mr. Inks and Mr. Beitzinger voiced <br /> concern about having a user-friendly ordinance which was understandable. <br /> Mr. Hunt noted that the Project Future website was receiving twenty (20) hits a month and now it <br /> is receiving one (1) hit a month;and that there is nothing in the pipe line for 2002. The City needs <br /> to have base abatements which are big enough to act as an incentive. <br /> Mr. Hunter stated that South Bend has given more tax abatements than anyone else in the State of <br /> Indiana. He further stated that he likes the 3-year base abatement and then develop the tiering <br /> system. <br /> Mr. Hunt suggested that we focus on the Chart on page 12 of the draft ordinance, and consider <br /> using 3,4,and 5 years as the base abatement periods. <br /> Council Member Coleman agreed with Mr. Hunt's suggestion that we should focus on the grid on <br /> page 12 and build upon that. For example considering the size of the overall project with more <br /> incentives for larger projects. Establishing proper thresholds will also be critical. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.