Laserfiche WebLink
CITY OF SOUTH BEND HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION <br />Commissioner Skaggs: I'm not detecting any hesitancy, so this may be beside <br />the point, but if you could just put it very bluntly for me, how does this get <br />around the properties owned by religious institutions? Sort of automatic <br />exclusion, but then, coming back in? <br />Adam Toering: That's a great question. So, a number of sites that are religiously <br />owned are added to the National Register of Historic places. I would say, like <br />the other paragraph there was the cemetery and I bring this up as a parallel, <br />city cemetery was added to the National Register of Historic Places in 2018, <br />that took some, I won't say finagling, but there was a number of back and forth <br />with that nomination. I always joking say there's a Vice President of the Unites <br />States buried in that cemetery and it was a big struggle to get that listed on the <br />National Register. So it can happen. I don't know if that answers your question <br />or not. <br />Todd Zeiger: So the exclusion is to carve out a property. You wouldn't be able to <br />nominate this property just because it's a Catholic church, but the importance <br />of being put on the National Register, which is what you were just talking <br />about, criteria A, B, C or D, sets out it's importance beside it being just a <br />Catholic Church. So it's an amazing architecture. You can't just nominate a <br />church cause it's Protestant or Catholic or whatever. The importance of <br />spending the extra time to knit that story together about the immigrants and the <br />art and the architecture and all of that helps set this church aside from just <br />another one that's just a Catholic church or a Protestant church. So that's that <br />hopefully helps you make the difference between just excluded because it's a <br />church versus not because this has deeper meaning to it. Just to try quick <br />criteria B, it's not any less or more on the National Register because it doesn't <br />have that other criteria. Two is good, call it good. Some only get one. <br />Adam Toering: I will say, I mean, for me when reviewing and writing the staff <br />recommendation, there's an amazing case for criteria C, which with the <br />Masters because of all the beautiful amazing artwork. Kudos again to Gavin for <br />doing the research, but showing who did what, when, and that narrative, which <br />I think, that in itself, I'm not saying that criteria A is not important, but like that's <br />a beautiful narrative that in and of itself is amazing. <br />After due consideration the following action was taken: <br />Upon a motion by Elizabeth Hertel, seconded by Joan Downs-Krostenko, and <br />UNANIMOUSLY carried by vote, the Historic Preservation Commission submits <br />their approval for the nomination of St. Adalbert Church Complex to the National <br />Register of Historic Places under criterion A and C and that all of the appropriate <br />paperwork be submitted to the Mayor for his concurrence, and that is then sent <br />onto state's representatives. <br />Vote: 6-0. Six in favor, none opposed. <br />Nomination of St. Adalbert Church Complex for addition to the National <br />Register of Historic Places is APPROVED <br />c. LOCAL LANDMARK NOMINATION <br />3016 Portage Avenue, "Portage Manor" (Audio Position: 44:24) <br />The staff update was presented by: Adam Toering <br />Todd Zeiger, with Indiana Landmarks, 801 W Washington, South Bend, IN also <br />gave an update on Portage Manor. <br />Page 17 <br />