My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-27-00 Zoning & Annexation
sbend
>
Public
>
Common Council
>
Minutes
>
Committee Meeting Minutes
>
2000
>
03-27-00 Zoning & Annexation
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/13/2013 3:26:51 PM
Creation date
2/13/2013 3:26:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council - City Clerk
City Council - Document Type
Committee Mtg Minutes
City Counci - Date
3/27/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
QCommUt* ort: <br /> Zoning and Annexation Committee <br /> to tbt Common Court' of ifit QCtt3 of font") Otatc <br /> The March 27, 2000 meeting of the Zoning and Annexation Committee was called to order <br /> by Council Member Karen L. White at 4:30 p.m. in the Council informal meeting room. <br /> Persons in attendance included Council Members: Coleman, Ujdak, Varner, Aranowski, <br /> Kelly, White, Kirsits, and Pfeifer, Kevin Butler, Ed Talley, Mr. and Mrs. Sexton, Leon <br /> Stein, Todd Zeiger, Timothy Lykowski, John Oxian, Terry Bland of the 'outb 1t� <br /> Zributtn and Kathleen Cekanski-Farrand, Council Attorney. <br /> Council Member White introduced the Committee members and then noted that the first <br /> item on the agenda was to review Substitute Bill No. 27-00 which is a request to designate <br /> the Remedy Building located at 501 West Colfax as an historic landmark. <br /> Mr. J. Edward Talley, Director of the Historic Preservation Commission made the <br /> presentation. He noted that the building in question was built in 1895 by the owners of the <br /> South Bend Remedy Company and was used for the manufacturing of medicines, <br /> chemicals and drugs. It is a two and a half story Queen Anne style late 19th century <br /> commercial building. Mr. Talley further noted that the building meets the criteria as a local <br /> landmark in light of the fact that it embodies the elements of architectural design, detail and <br /> craftsmanship and its rated a "Significant 12"; that it is suitable for preservation since it is <br /> the only commercial structure of its style and architectural elegance remaining in the city; <br /> and because it is identified with the lives of persons of historical significance, namely <br /> Albert and Richard Kelley. He revied the October 20, 1999 minutes from the West <br /> Washington-Chapin Design Review Committee meeting and the March 27, 2000 letter from <br /> Michael R. Elbode, President of the Colfax Group(copies attached). <br /> Mr. Talley stated that "interim protection" took effect with notice being given to the <br /> owners, Timothy J. and Kathy Lynn Lykowski by a letter dated September 27, 1999 (copy <br /> attached). Interim protection provides that a building cannot be moved or demolished for a <br /> period of six (6) months or until the Local Historic Landmark Designation has been <br /> established. The governing authority is set forth in § 21-117.2 of the outs) tt� <br /> AfittnitiPai 14 . . He further noted that he sent a letter dated March 3, 2000 (copy <br /> attached) which provides further detailed information and notes that the structure is under <br /> interim protection until March 27, 2000. Mr. Talley stressed that the historic landmark <br /> designation would be for the structure only, with discussion taking place on the relocation <br /> of the building. <br /> Mr. Timothy Lykowski, the owner of the building, noted that he has owned it since 1988. <br /> The Lykowski Construction Company has incurred substantial cost totaling approximately <br /> $5,200 each year in taxes and insurance. He would be in favor of moving the building if it <br /> can be done on a timely basis. The overall cost of the project is estimated to be $250,000 <br /> to$350,000. To date he has been unsuccessful in finding a buyer. He would be open to a <br /> continuance on the matter for up to three (3) months, however voiced concern that he is <br /> unaware of any studies addressing the costs to renovate the building. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.