06-12-00 Zoning & Annexation - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

iciong and Annexation Committee 11 3300 Jrce 3 being provided that in fact a legal transaction would be forthcoming. The Council Attorney noted that the Historic Preservation Commission could seek an extension of the interim protection without the Council being obligated to move forward on the ', ordinance this evening. In request to a question from Council Member King, it was noted that the lot is to be purchased but that the Remedy Building itself was to be donated. Council Member King inquired that if the "carrying costs"could be addressed whether an agreement between the parties could be reached. Mr. Lykowski stated that items could be discussed and agreed to however he continued to voice concern about the term of the proposal being outlined by Mr. Zeiger. In response to a question from Council Member Ujdak, Mr. Lykowski stated that the mowing of the property and the trash on the property are the biggest problems in addition to the continuing costs of liability insurance. Council Member Ujdak noted that Mr. Zeiger indicated that the finance meeting is scheduled to take place on June 13th and the executive meeting on June 20th. In light of these dates and the lack of firm agreements in place, he suggested that the proposed ordinance be continued until the June 26th Council meeting. Following discussion, Council Member Varner made a motion, seconded by Council Member Ujdak that Substitute Bill No. 27-00 be continued until the June 26th committee and Council meeting,and that Mr. Zeiger file with the Office of the City Clerk a written update no later than Friday,June 23, 2000. The motion passed. The Committee then reviewed Bill No. 45-00 which is a request to establish as an historic landmark the property located at 3020 Buckingham. Mr. Talley circulated pictures of the subject property. Dr. Varner noted that there has been no response from the property owners and this raises I concerns since the property is located in the 5th District which he represents. He quoted from the HPC letter of March 21,2000 sent to the property owners which did not elicit a response. Mr. Talley stated that the Historic Preservation Commission is reviewing five (5) possible landmark designations each moth and that often nothing is heard from the property owners. f Council Member Kelly voiced concern about this procedure and stated that he was not comfortable of voting on this bill tonight. The Council Attorney noted that the Common Council has voiced concern about the notice procedures in this area for well over a year. She suggested that proposed historic landmarks not be filed for Council consideration until after formal notification to the proposed affected property owners could be validated. Following discussion, Council Member Ujdak made a motion, seconded by Council Member Varner that Bill No. 45-00 be continued until July 24,2000. The motion passed. The next item on the agenda was Bill No. 6-00 which addresses the Royal Oaks Estates annexation. Council Member White noted that the Council had received a memorandum form Mr. Littrell dated June 8, 2000 (copy attached) which addressed the water, sanitary sewer lines, street