My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Opening of Proposals - Safe Roads to School Kennedy School - DLZ Inc.
sbend
>
Public
>
Public Works
>
Board of Works Documents
>
2023
>
Opening of Quotations/Proposals
>
Opening of Proposals - Safe Roads to School Kennedy School - DLZ Inc.
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/14/2023 1:15:46 PM
Creation date
2/14/2023 1:15:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board of Public Works
Document Type
Projects
Document Date
2/14/2023
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Safe Routes to School | 7 <br />Utility Coordination <br />Utility Coordination is an important <br />aspect of all projects, and we believe <br />it is a critical component of design <br />to maintain schedule, even on <br />curb ramp and sidewalk projects. <br />Our experience and preliminary <br />observation of the project area <br />indicates that utility conflicts will <br />likely be present. It is anticipated <br />that a majority of these conflicts can <br />be avoided through detailed and <br />creative design. We are prepared to <br />take a proactive approach to avoid <br />delays and issues during construction. <br />Utility coordination activities will <br />include: <br />• Initial notice to utilities and <br />verification of facilities <br />• Periodic status and plan updates <br />of the project to keep utilities <br />informed <br />• Correspondence and meetings <br />with utilities to discuss potential <br />conflicts and resolutions, if <br />necessary. <br />• Obtaining utility work plans, <br />including relocation plans, when <br />necessary. <br />Missing sidewalk <br />Environmental Documentation <br />The use of federal funding triggers compliance with National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) documentation <br />requirements. DLZ has conducted a field visit and preliminary reviews of GIS data available on the IndianaMap website, <br />the IDEM Virtual File Cabinet, IDNR’s Indiana Buildings, Bridges, and Cemeteries Map website and other information <br />to identify potential “red flag” resources or issues that may need to be considered during design. Resources/issues <br />noted in and near the project area include public parks, schools, an active railroad, an abandoned railroad, a planned <br />trail and hazardous materials sites. Designs that minimize impacts to such resources and issues will be developed. The <br />identified features are not anticipated to impede project development. <br />The project will also require compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, which sets forth <br />a review process for identifying historic properties (including archaeological sites) and assessing potential effects. <br />The project proposes work types which receive Section 106 approval under the MPPA. The services of Qualified <br />Professional cultural subconsultants would be required if the project were to impact historic character-defining features <br />or impact previously undisturbed soils. <br />If less than 0.5 acre of new right of way is to be acquired, a Level 1 Categorical Exclusion (CE) would be required. A <br />Level 2 CE would be required if more than 0.5 acre of new right of way is to be acquired. Section 4(f) involvement with <br />a public park would require preparation of a Level 4 CE. <br />ENVIRONMENTAL <br />CHALLENGES SOLUTIONS <br />Section 106 <br />The project proposes work types which receive Section 106 approval under the Minor <br />Projects Programmatic Agreement (MPPA). MPPA applicability will expedite completion <br />of the NEPA documentation. <br />Section 4(f) <br />Section 4(f) properties, including public parks and historic properties, were noted in the <br />project area. No impacts are anticipated at this time. If it is determined that right of way <br />is required, the project intent will be to limit any impacts such that De minimis impact/ <br />Section 4(f) MOU criteria are met. A De Minimis finding(s)/Section 4(f) MOU applicability <br />will expedite completion of the NEPA documentation. <br />Stream and Water <br />Quality Impacts <br />Implementation of INDOT Standard Specifications is anticipated to adequately address <br />water quality concerns. No streams were noted near the project area. Impacts are not <br />anticipated. <br />Wetlands No NWI-mapped wetlands were noted near the project area. Impacts are not anticipated. <br />Floodplains/ <br />Floodways No floodplain areas were noted within the project area. No impacts are anticipated. <br />Threatened and <br />Endangered <br />Species <br />DLZ will conduct programmatic consultation for bat species of concern using the on- <br />line USFWS IPaC system, which streamlines the consultation process. “No Effect” <br />determinations, or “May Affect, Not Likely to Adversely Affect” determinations are <br />anticipated. If trees are removed/trimmed, a seasonal tree clearing restriction is expected <br />(trees may not be removed from April 1 through September 30). <br />Hazardous <br />Materials Sites <br />Hazardous materials sites were noted within the project area. Given the minor nature of <br />sidewalk construction activities, no impacts are anticipated.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.