My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Rejection of Quotes - Walker Field House Restoration – Project No. 120-010R
sbend
>
Public
>
Public Works
>
Board of Works Documents
>
2022
>
Reject Bids/Quotes/Proposals
>
Rejection of Quotes - Walker Field House Restoration – Project No. 120-010R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/20/2022 2:16:15 PM
Creation date
12/20/2022 2:16:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board of Public Works
Document Type
Projects
Document Date
12/20/2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM <br /> DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS <br /> DIVISION OF ENGINEERING <br />TO: Theresa Heffner, Clerk <br />Board of Public Works <br />FROM: Becca Plantz, Project Engineer <br />SUBJECT: Reject Project No. 120-010R <br />Walker Field House Restoration Project <br />DATE: December 14, 2022 <br />On December 13, 2022, the Board of Public Works opened quotes for the above project. I have <br />reviewed them and found that both quotes are missing essential/required documentation, <br />therefore both quotes are unresponsive. <br />The quoters ranked as follows: <br />Quoter Base Quote <br />Amount Alternate 1 Alternate 2 Base + <br />Alternate 1 <br />1. Acculevel $28,764.00 $45,276.00 $25/LF $74,040.00 <br />2. Kent Companies, Inc.$46,820.00 $71,807.00 $235/5 LF $118,627.00 <br />I recommend rejection of the two contracts for Walker Field House Restoration Project due to <br />unresponsive quotes. Both quotes included attached proposals on company letterheads that <br />included exclusions, clarifications, additional notes, terms, and conditions which deviate from <br />the original quote documents. In addition to contractor specifications that can’t be accepted after <br />the public open, neither quoter attempted to participate in the MWBE Inclusion Program. The <br />grant requires a statements on experience, three references, and quote bonds in order to be <br />eligible for funding award. Kent Companies included a quote bond but missed other DHPA <br />Quote requirements. Acculevel did not include a quote bond, DHPA requirements, or an <br />executed non-collusion, non-debarment affidavit. In summary, the deficiencies listed make both <br />quote unresponsive. <br />Please call with your questions (5998). <br />December 20, 2022
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.