Laserfiche WebLink
^lam <br /> Comm Wu *sport: <br /> Parks and Recreation Committee <br /> t jt Common Council of t jt titi of §out j Otnti: <br /> The September 23, 1996 meeting of the Parks and Recreation Committee was called to <br /> order by its Chairperson, Council Member John Broden at 4:18 P.M. in the Council <br /> informal meeting room. <br /> Persons in attendance included Council Members: Luecke, Kelly, Varner, Coleman, <br /> Broden,Washington, and Pfeifer; Bill Carleton,Don Porter, Citizen Member Sue Ushella, <br /> Phil St. Clair,and Kathleen Cekanski-Farrand. <br /> Council Member Broden noted that the only item on the agenda was to review Resolution <br /> 96-94, which concerns the acquisition by lease of certain equipment for the Park <br /> Department. <br /> Mr. St. Clair noted that the lease with Norwest for the softball fields is in the amount of <br /> $700,000. The total project is$2.3 million with the Common Council having appropriated <br /> $500,000 earlier from cash reserves th i s year. The com p letion date for the project is May <br /> or June of 1997. <br /> Mr. Bill Carleton then handed a Summary dated July 22, 1996,from Norwest Bank which <br /> summarizes the provisions of the proposed lease. He noted that the lease would be paid <br /> over ten Y ears at a rate of 6.35% interest. Council Member Luecke noted that the lease <br /> payments levy ments would come from the lev and be handled through the budgetary process with <br /> the revenue being generated from the so f tball complex x being used for maintenance. <br /> Council Member Broden noted that he had played in the Indianapolis Softball Complex and <br /> in other fields throughout the State and believes that the fields in South Bend are <br /> comparable or better than those. <br /> Council Member Pfeifer noted that she has heard several individuals note that they have <br /> been unable schedule field time and that teams have been turned away. <br /> Council Member Coleman noted that the softball complex is the result of a number of years <br /> of discussion and planning in meetings and complimented the Park administration for <br /> moving forward with the project. <br /> Following discussion, Council Member Coleman made a motion seconded be Council <br /> Member Luecke that Resolution No. 96-95 be recommended favorably to Council. The <br /> motion passed. <br /> Mr. St. Clair noted that Bill No. 62-96 regarding the designation of Leeper Park as an <br /> historic landmark was to be continued. He noted that the walk through at the Park last <br /> Thursday was very informative and that much discussion with regard to proposed changes <br /> of the criterion standards is taking place. Council Member Coleman also noted that there <br /> • <br />