My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-12-96 Community & Economic Development
sbend
>
Public
>
Common Council
>
Minutes
>
Committee Meeting Minutes
>
1996
>
02-12-96 Community & Economic Development
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2013 2:06:00 PM
Creation date
2/4/2013 2:05:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council - City Clerk
City Council - Document Type
Committee Mtg Minutes
City Counci - Date
2/12/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Committee Report <br /> Community and Economic Development <br /> February 12, 1996 <br /> Page 3 <br /> Following favorable comments by Council Member Zakrzewski,Council Member Luecke <br /> made a motion, seconded by Council Member Zakrzewski that Resolution No. 96-12 be <br /> recommended favorably to Council.The motion passed. <br /> The Committee then returned to Resolution No 96-8 which is a 10 year Real Property Tax <br /> Abatement request for the property located at 5820 West F. Jay Nimtz Parkway.Mr.Mike <br /> Beitzinger reviewed the report dated February 5, 1996 and noted that the petitioner is <br /> requesting a special exception under Section 2-84 of the South Bend Municipal Code. <br /> Mr. William Hurst then made the presentation. He noted that currently large hotels are <br /> being over built and only larger cities are being looked at by developers and the banking <br /> industry. They see a busy Airport in South Bend and that Blackthorn will be busy in the <br /> future.They are working with the city and believe that this will be a choice location in the <br /> years to come.He noted that for every dollar that a hotel brings in that its is leveraged 7 to <br /> 9 times.He stated that the petitioner proposes to build a 4-story 150 room full service hotel <br /> on approximately 4.5 acres of land in the Blackthorn Corporate Office Park area.Total cost <br /> of the construction is estimated at approximately $10, 000,000.00. He noted that average <br /> room rate will be between$70.00 to$72.00 with$64.00 for a single room.There will be a <br /> free breakfast and it will be licensed by"Choice International"and it will be of the level of <br /> a Marriott Courtyard. <br /> In response to a question raised by Council Member Varner, it was noted that there is <br /> discussion with regard to a 5 year non-compete for property owned by the Airport <br /> Authority and Blackthorn only.Jon Hunt stated that this is a very quality project and spoke <br /> in favor of the overall development. He noted that all financing must be in place by <br /> February 27, 1997. Mr. Hurst noted that the developer has developed over 450 million <br /> dollars of real estate over the past several years. Mr. Beitzinger noted that if they cannot <br /> meet the financing deadline that they will have to come back to the Common Council with <br /> regard to the tax abatement. <br /> tax abatement. <br /> Ann Kolata also spoke in favor of the proposed 10 year real property <br /> Discussion then took place with regard to why tax abatement was necessary. Ann Kolota <br /> noted that the Corporate Park itself is not providing tax abatement incentives for office type <br /> structures. <br /> The Council Attorney noted that in the proposed Resolution that Section VI sets for the <br /> specific reasons why the Council,if they believe a special exception is necessary,believes <br /> that the project should go forward with the tax abatement. <br /> Council Member Hosinski stated that this is one of the most significant investments in <br /> Blackthorn and that the hotel will be cornerstone for continued growth. Council Member <br /> Kelly stated that the taxes of$2 1/2 million dollars which would be the amount of taxes <br /> paid after the abatement is indeed significant. <br /> Council Member Hosinski attempted to make a motion in favor of the proposed abatement <br /> however was unable to do so since he was not on the Committee. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.