My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
IPC Board Meeting Minutes October 2022
sbend
>
Public
>
Inclusive Procurement and Contracting Board (MBE/WBE)
>
Agendas & Packets
>
2022
>
11-01-2022
>
IPC Board Meeting Minutes October 2022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/28/2022 3:52:12 PM
Creation date
10/28/2022 3:50:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council - City Clerk
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• Kara Boyles: States that goal waivers are utilized when contractors have met <br />good faith efforts, or when the scope of a project changes. <br />• Michael Schmidt: States that program administrators are notified of an <br />increase or decrease in the scope of a project. Further, administrators then <br />decide on what changes are to be made. Contractors are not able to eliminate <br />the goals of the original contract. <br />o Discussion Point <br />• Michael Schmidt: States that current projects are nearing the 75% threshold <br />of completion and team is running into issues because contractors have been <br />slow to update B2G Now and learning how the system functions. <br /> <br /> <br />V. Procurement - Michael Schmidt <br />o Report Updates <br />• Minority business numbers have improved. Jackson Services had a large <br />engagement for a demolition project with the City and that is what is driving <br />the increase in numbers. <br />• Also receiving a handful of vendors that we have updated as women or <br />minority-owned. <br />o Discussion Point <br />• Murray Miller: Asks if professional services count towards goals. <br />• Michael Schmidt: They are exempt from the ordinance due to being a <br />professional service. <br />• Murray Miller: Asks if that messes with the numbers. <br />• Michael Schmidt: States that he sees two competing numbers. He looks at <br />what the City spends with MWBEs each month and year-to-date citywide, <br />and then at Public Works, which functions through goal setting where there <br />are contractors, but states that he doesn’t have access to that tracking. <br />• Michael Patton: States that B2G Now tracks the logistics of Public Works. <br />Says he will share it with the Board. <br />o Discussion Point <br />• Michael Schmidt: States that there is a new issue. Says there was a minority <br />contractor that did not make an effort to contact women-owned sub- <br />contractors. Because of this, their quote was rejected. <br />1. Due to the program plan, there would not be a way to reward this <br />minority company (for example) if they did reach a good faith effort <br />in trying to fulfill the goals of the contract. <br />2. Schmidt encourages the Board to be proactive in thinking about a <br />solution, or pathway, that best resolves this problem, as the quote <br />would have been ideal for the budget of the set project if the <br />minority business owner had met good faith efforts in finding a <br />women-owned business. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.