Laserfiche WebLink
proposed door system operates on a track, or if they will survive the deconstruction/salvage process. The existing <br />carriage doors are recessed in the openings, so there is some space for the installation of a new door system. <br /> <br />The Standards and Guidelines require that “Additions and improvements involving any new material in the <br />landmark should be of the same material as the original. It should be the same size and texture. An alternative <br />material may be allowed if it duplicates the original.” The proposed doors do not replicate the pattern/configuration <br />of the existing carriage doors and are indicative of a more contemporary/modern architectural style. <br /> <br />The Commission requested additional information related to the proposed door project at the September HPC <br />meeting. <br /> <br />Update, 10/5/2022: The applicant indicated that they would like to replace the “damaged garage door on the front <br />(far Westside)” with a “metal overhead insulated garage door” that would provide “safe functional use unlike <br />current door. Same measurements. Winter is coming and we need to park our 8 vehicles inside without the risk of <br />the garage door falling on them.” This new proposed replacement door is a commercially available metal overhead <br />door. <br /> <br />Update, 10/7/2022: Applicant furnished drawings that indicate how the doors would be installed in the openings, as <br />well as information related to the overhead commercial door being proposed for the western opening. <br /> <br />Update, 10/9/2022: Applicant indicated that the new overhead door would be white in color. <br /> <br />Summary: Applicant is proposing to install the ‘salvaged’ metal/accordion doors. Applicant also proposes replacing <br />the western garage door with a new metal commercial garage door (in white). <br /> <br />STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: “GROUP B” Standards <br />Preservation Standards for local historic landmarks are used by the Historic Preservation Commission whenever exterior changes are proposed <br />for officially designated structures. Review is required when proposed plans for building and development indicate the architectural character <br />of the landmark will be changed, i.e., review is required for any project that affects the exterior of the building, site, outbuildings, grounds and <br />landscaping. These standards are an extension of the present Ordinance #5567-73 and #54A-973 already adopted to implement a comprehensive <br />program of historic preservation. <br /> <br />The present historic preservation ordinances empower the Commission to issue or deny a Certificate of Appropriateness prior to the <br />construction, reconstruction, alteration, demolition, or moving of any landmark. The ordinance also gives the Commission the power to <br />establish reasonable and just standards for the preservation of historic landmarks, including architectural treatment, site development and <br />maintenance provisions, providing that the standards are in keeping with the intent of the ordinance and that the standards apply only to the <br />exterior features of the historic landmark. These standards guide the commission in their review of Certificates of Appropriateness. <br /> <br />The two major conditions under which change will occur are maintenance or improvement and the demolition of an existing landmark. <br /> <br />The Historic Preservation Commission has established two levels of preservation standards—Group A and Group B. Group A standards are the <br />more comprehensive of the two and require that the original character of the building be maintained or restored. Group B (your Standards) <br />require that the building be maintained as is and, if possible, returned to the original. One of these levels will be selected at the time of <br />designation. Both require a Certificate of Appropriateness before the construction, reconstruction, alteration, demolition, or moving of any <br />landmark structure or site. <br /> <br />The property owner is responsible for furnishing the Commission with a complete description of the proposed changes. This information may <br />be plans, elevations, specifications, photographs, or other means to accurately describe the project. When an application is being reviewed, it <br />will be the responsibility of the applicant to demonstrate that the new work is compatible. <br /> <br />DEFINITIONS <br />Shall—Defined as an expression of something that is mandatory or must be done. <br />Should—Defined as an expression of obligation, something that ought to be done but that is open to compromise. <br />Required—Defined as work which shall be done in a restoration or rehabilitation project in order to restore or maintain the original or existing <br />character of the structure or site. <br />Recommended—Defined as work which should be done to help restore or maintain the original or existing character of the structure or site. <br />Prohibited—Defined as work which shall not be permitted in a restoration or rehabilitation project because it may have a negative impact on the <br />original or existing character of the structure or site. <br /> <br />GROUP B STANDARDS <br />The Commission has the authority to determine the architectural merits and the extent of any proposed treatment, renovation, or addition to a <br />historic landmark. The commission will require drawings, plans, specifications, and/or samples where appropriate. <br />A. Maintenance