Laserfiche WebLink
Committee Report <br /> Health and Public Safety Committee <br /> January 6, 1995 <br />• Page 2 <br /> Council Member Slavinskas stated that the argument is not over$700.00 but rather <br /> one of fairness. He stated that he would prefer that the Chief's have an option with regard <br /> to giving of obsolete equipment and that he hoped that through the process that something <br /> appropriate would be given upon retirement. <br /> In response to a question raised by Council Member Zakrzewski, Chief Marciniak <br /> noted that the cost of the guns which are currently being used by the Police Department <br /> were $658.00 with a trade-in. Chief Marciniak noted that the Common Council has been <br /> pro-public safety and pro-police for a long period of time. He noted that this is an <br /> emotional issue and that in some respects it is also a sentimental issue since officers depend <br /> upon their equipment as a matter of life and death and that it is not a matter of money. He <br /> stated that he understands Council Member Coleman's position however believes that since <br /> the State of Indiana sees no problem in giving their officers their service weapons upon <br /> retirement that the City of South Bend should continue giving their service weapons also <br /> upon retirement. He stated that the men and women that work for the South Bend Police <br /> Department are constantly trained with the handling care and discharge of the weapons and <br /> therefore safety should not be an issue.He stated that the Common Council made the right <br /> discussion in 1988 and that it should be continued. He stated that he believes that the large <br /> majority of the Police Department would prefer the weapon which they have used in the <br /> line of duty. <br /> Council Member Luecke noted that there is a difference between registration and a <br /> permit to carry a gun. Chief Marciniak noted that the State issues a a lifetime permit to <br /> officers upon 20 years of service after retirement. <br /> Sgt. Dave Hecklinski stated that part of his duties include the issuance of gun <br /> permits. He stated that typically approximately 500 to 600 gun permits are issued but in <br /> 1994,797 gun permits were issued with many if not most of the individuals receiving such <br /> permits not being trained at all into how to use such weapons. <br /> Chief Marciniak noted that in his discussions with the City Controller that between <br /> 16 to 20 city employees retire each year. <br /> Chief Taylor stated that he does not want fire helmets stacking up in the fire stations <br /> each year. Since the City purchased the new helmets as a result of OSHA regulations he <br /> believes that this is a fitting and appropriate retirement gift to Fire fighters upon 20 or more <br /> years of service to the City. <br /> Council Member Kelly appreciated the thoughts and ideas set forth by Council <br /> Member Coleman. He stated that officers are well trained and that he would prefer status <br /> quo by permitting officers to retain their service weapons upon retirement.He believes that <br /> an overall gift policy for retiring members of the Police and Fire Departments is proper and <br /> appropriate. He also noted that the Gun Control Ordinance which he authored required <br /> training and that he shares the same concern that Sgt. Hecklinski noted earlier in this area. <br /> Council Member Zakrzewski stated that he was that sponsor of the 1988 Ordinance and his <br /> position has not changed.In discussions with then Corporal Richard Redwine it was noted <br /> that police moral in 1988 was low and that it was not a matter of dollars and cents. <br />